Here is a summary of your page denying the deity of Jesus Christ.

The web page in question challenges the notion of the deity of Jesus and questions the accuracy and authenticity of the Bible. It argues against the idea that God preserved the Bible infallibly, suggesting that the text has been altered and edited throughout history. The page emphasizes that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and the belief in Jesus as God have been introduced from pagan influences and are not consistent with the original teachings of Jesus and his early followers.

The author contends that the doctrine of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and other elements attributed to Jesus were added to the scriptures later on and were influenced by pagan concepts. The page highlights the concept of a more spiritual Christianity, emphasizing individual learning from God rather than adhering to institutionalized dogma.

Throughout the text, there is an effort to demonstrate that the early followers of Jesus, particularly the Messianic Jewish Christians, did not view Jesus as God, but rather as a divine pattern to be emulated. The author disputes the virgin birth, arguing that it was a later addition to the texts and a product of Pagan influences.

The page also discusses the alterations and revisions made to the scriptures, asserting that these changes were done to conform to the doctrines of the Roman Church and to make Christianity compatible with the secular environment of Rome. The text suggests that early Christian writings were edited to align with the evolving institutionalized church, and that the pure spiritual teachings of Jesus were obscured over time.

In summary, the web page questions the deity of Jesus, asserts that core Christian doctrines were influenced by Pagan beliefs, challenges the authenticity of the Bible due to alterations and revisions, and advocates for a return to the original spiritual teachings of Jesus and the rejection of institutionalized dogma.

I believe in the Oneness of God versus the Trinity but your Nazirene-linked page is outright blasphemous. Here is a summary of it.

The web page in question challenges the notion of the deity of Jesus and questions the accuracy and authenticity of the Bible. It argues against the idea that God preserved the Bible infallibly, suggesting that the text has been altered and edited throughout history. The page emphasizes that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and the belief in Jesus as God have been introduced from pagan influences and are not consistent with the original teachings of Jesus and his early followers.

The author contends that the doctrine of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and other elements attributed to Jesus were added to the scriptures later on and were influenced by pagan concepts. The page highlights the concept of a more spiritual Christianity, emphasizing individual learning from God rather than adhering to institutionalized dogma.

Throughout the text, there is an effort to demonstrate that the early followers of Jesus, particularly the Messianic Jewish Christians, did not view Jesus as God, but rather as a divine pattern to be emulated. The author disputes the virgin birth, arguing that it was a later addition to the texts and a product of Pagan influences.

The page also discusses the alterations and revisions made to the scriptures, asserting that these changes were done to conform to the doctrines of the Roman Church and to make Christianity compatible with the secular environment of Rome. The text suggests that early Christian writings were edited to align with the evolving institutionalized church, and that the pure spiritual teachings of Jesus were obscured over time.

In summary, the web page questions the deity of Jesus, asserts that core Christian doctrines were influenced by Pagan beliefs, challenges the authenticity of the Bible due to alterations and revisions, and advocates for a return to the original spiritual teachings of Jesus and the rejection of institutionalized dogma.

I believe in the Onessnes of God versus the Trinity but your Nazirene-linked page is outright blasphemous. Here is a summary of it.

The web page in question challenges the notion of the deity of Jesus and questions the accuracy and authenticity of the Bible. It argues against the idea that God preserved the Bible infallibly, suggesting that the text has been altered and edited throughout history. The page emphasizes that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and the belief in Jesus as God have been introduced from pagan influences and are not consistent with the original teachings of Jesus and his early followers.

The author contends that the doctrine of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and other elements attributed to Jesus were added to the scriptures later on and were influenced by pagan concepts. The page highlights the concept of a more spiritual Christianity, emphasizing individual learning from God rather than adhering to institutionalized dogma.

Throughout the text, there is an effort to demonstrate that the early followers of Jesus, particularly the Messianic Jewish Christians, did not view Jesus as God, but rather as a divine pattern to be emulated. The author disputes the virgin birth, arguing that it was a later addition to the texts and a product of Pagan influences.

The page also discusses the alterations and revisions made to the scriptures, asserting that these changes were done to conform to the doctrines of the Roman Church and to make Christianity compatible with the secular environment of Rome. The text suggests that early Christian writings were edited to align with the evolving institutionalized church, and that the pure spiritual teachings of Jesus were obscured over time.

In summary, the web page questions the deity of Jesus, asserts that core Christian doctrines were influenced by Pagan beliefs, challenges the authenticity of the Bible due to alterations and revisions, and advocates for a return to the original spiritual teachings of Jesus and the rejection of institutionalized dogma.

I believe in more of the Onessnes of God versus the Trinity but your Nazirene-linked page is blasphemous. Here is a summary of it.

The web page in question challenges the notion of the deity of Jesus and questions the accuracy and authenticity of the Bible. It argues against the idea that God preserved the Bible infallibly, suggesting that the text has been altered and edited throughout history. The page emphasizes that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and the belief in Jesus as God have been introduced from pagan influences and are not consistent with the original teachings of Jesus and his early followers.

The author contends that the doctrine of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and other elements attributed to Jesus were added to the scriptures later on and were influenced by pagan concepts. The page highlights the concept of a more spiritual Christianity, emphasizing individual learning from God rather than adhering to institutionalized dogma.

Throughout the text, there is an effort to demonstrate that the early followers of Jesus, particularly the Messianic Jewish Christians, did not view Jesus as God, but rather as a divine pattern to be emulated. The author disputes the virgin birth, arguing that it was a later addition to the texts and a product of Pagan influences.

The page also discusses the alterations and revisions made to the scriptures, asserting that these changes were done to conform to the doctrines of the Roman Church and to make Christianity compatible with the secular environment of Rome. The text suggests that early Christian writings were edited to align with the evolving institutionalized church, and that the pure spiritual teachings of Jesus were obscured over time.

In summary, the web page questions the deity of Jesus, asserts that core Christian doctrines were influenced by Pagan beliefs, challenges the authenticity of the Bible due to alterations and revisions, and advocates for a return to the original spiritual teachings of Jesus and the rejection of institutionalized dogma.