Thats not at all what I am saying.

I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.

Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.

Just because I agree with some things she is saying doesnt mean i should trust her. See Desantas, Ramaswampy, every other obvious deep state rino, etc.

The ad hominem doesnt help your case by the way.

Thats not at all what I am saying.

I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.

Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.

Just because I agree with some things she is saying doesnt mean i should trust her. See Desantas, Ramaswampy, every other obvious deep state rino, etc.

Thats not at all what I am saying.

I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.

Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.