Blah, blah, blah maser laser. Unnecessary (and completely false) personal attack thrown in to support argument, blah.

You obviously didn't actually read a word I said. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual frequency laser system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" has a smaller beam. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing applications. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these aberrant fire events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser. Unnecessary (and completely false) personal attack thrown in to support argument, blah.

You obviously didn't actually read a word I said. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" has a smaller beam. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing applications. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these aberrant fire events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser. Unnecessary (and completely false) personal attack thrown in to support argument, blah.

You obviously didn't actually read a word I said. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" has a smaller beam. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing applications. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser. Unnecessary (and completely false) personal attack thrown in to support argument, blah.

You obviously didn't actually read a word I said. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" has a smaller beam. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser. Unnecessary (and completely false) personal attack thrown in to support argument, blah.

You obviously didn't actually read a word I said. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser. Unnecessary personal attack thrown in to support argument, blah.

You obviously didn't actually read a word I said. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You obviously didn't actually read a word I said. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency, period. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

I come up with plausbiles as well, but I am not stating my suppositions are "truth," one way or another, I am only showing that it is not impossible. That is always the greatest hurdle, admitting that a thing is not impossible.

You're not much of a hurdler.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency, period. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

That is why I question your motives. You come up with "plausibles" and call it "proof." That is exactly the tactic used to hide things by the media, the C_A, the government, corporations, etc.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency, period. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show what appear to be occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency, period. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose of the secondary laser is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency, period. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. The system I proposed was a dual system based on existing technologies. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose there is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency, period. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. I think it's likely a dual system. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose there is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show occasional pulse beams, scattering off the clouds/smoke which would not be microwaves.

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.

Blah, blah, blah maser laser.

You seriously didn't actually read a word I said, obviously. I think you are being pedantic, and you are perhaps completely unfamiliar with modern day lingo. A laser is just a laser, regardless of frequency, period. Everyone knows it but you. Apparently you didn't get the memo.

In order to have pinpoint target selection (meters), the projection aperture must be tens of kilometers in size.

You didn't get what I was saying. I think it's likely a dual system. The microwave is a much wider beam (by the time it gets to earth), and the coupling frequency laser, the "igniter" is the smaller. I think that because that is how these things are done in some metal 3D printing. It is also part of the construction of the solar energy collector I linked to you (though perhaps the stated purpose there is not exactly the same) and because the videos of these events show occasional pulse beams (which would not be microwaves).

to invoke something that does not exist (spaceborne or airborne DEWs), and for which there is NO EVIDENCE.

There is a metric fuckton of evidence, you just refuse to admit that it is, because you can explain it away in a way that is not actually an explaination at all, but a wagon full of suppositions.