Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

it's extremely complicated

It's a matter of perspective. Everything simple is complicated. An apple sitting on a counter is not exhibiting complicated behavior, but look deeper, and it becomes a quantum soup so complex that it is not even something we can imagine in any meaningful way.

Barr has no more relevance than any of us, that is what you're missing.

Well, perhaps, but not from a certain perspective. She is more relevant in some ways by her being both an insider and an actor that is part of the show. What I meant in my post was, that everyone that we see is both an insider AND an actor. This means two things:

  1. We are watching a movie. EVERYTHING we see is a part of that movie, including her statements here. This, btw, is what I meant by "It's not complicated."
  2. That movie has a director. That director is also an insider. Are they directing this show on behalf of the Cabal or We The People? I think it's the latter. There is a lot of evidence to support that, but I suggest we won't really know until the credits start rolling.
1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

it's extremely complicated

It's a matter of perspective. Everything simple is complicated. An apple sitting on a counter is not exhibiting complicated behavior, but look deeper, and it becomes a quantum soup so complex that it is not even something we can imagine in any meaningful way.

Barr has no more relevance than any of us, that is what you're missing.

Well, perhaps, but not from a certain perspective. She is more relevant in some ways by her being both an insider and an actor that is part of the show. What I meant was, that everyone that we see is both an insider AND an actor. This means two things:

  1. We are watching a movie. EVERYTHING we see is a part of that movie, including her statements here. This, btw, is what I meant by "It's not complicated."
  2. That movie has a director. That director is also an insider. Are they directing this show on behalf of the Cabal or We The People? I think it's the latter. There is a lot of evidence to support that, but I suggest we won't really know until the credits start rolling.
1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

it's extremely complicated

It's a matter of perspective. Everything simple is complicated. An apple sitting on a counter is not exhibiting complicated behavior, but look deeper, and it becomes a quantum soup so complex that it is not even something we can imagine in any meaningful way.

Barr has no more relevance than any of us, that is what you're missing.

Well, perhaps, but not from a certain perspective. She is more relevant in some ways by her being both an insider and an actor that is part of the show. What I meant was, that everyone we see is both an insider AND an actor. This means two things:

  1. We are watching a movie. EVERYTHING we see is a part of that movie, including her statements here. This, btw, is what I meant by "It's not complicated."
  2. That movie has a director. That director is also an insider. Are they directing this show on behalf of the Cabal or We The People? I think it's the latter. There is a lot of evidence to support that, but I suggest we won't really know until the credits start rolling.
1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

it's extremely complicated

It's a matter of perspective. Everything simple is complicated. An apple sitting on a counter is not exhibiting complicated behavior, but look deeper, and it becomes a quantum soup so complex that it is not even something we can imagine in any meaningful way.

Barr has no more relevance than any of us, that is what you're missing.

First, it's not something I "missed." On the contrary, her being more relevant is implicit in my statement of her being both an insider and an actor that is part of the show. What I meant was, that everyone we see is both an insider AND an actor. This means two things:

  1. We are watching a movie. EVERYTHING we see is a part of that movie, including her statements here. This, btw, is what I meant by "It's not complicated."
  2. That movie has a director. That director is also an insider. Are they directing this show on behalf of the Cabal or We The People? I think it's the latter. There is a lot of evidence to support that, but I suggest we won't really know until the credits start rolling.
1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

it's extremely complicated

It's a matter of perspective. Everything simple is complicated. An apple sitting on a counter is not exhibiting complicated behavior, but look deeper, and it becomes a quantum soup so complex that it is not even something we can imagine in any meaningful way.

Barr has no more relevance than any of us, that is what you're missing.

First, it's not something I "missed." On the contrary, her being more relevant is implicit in my statement of her being both an insider and an actor that is part of the show. What I meant was, that everyone we see is both an insider AND an actor. This means two things:

  1. We are watching a movie. EVERYTHING we see is a part of that movie. This, btw, is what I meant by "It's not complicated."
  2. That movie has a director. That director is also an insider. Are they directing this show on behalf of the Cabal or We The People? I think it's the latter. There is a lot of evidence to support that, but I suggest we won't really know until the credits start rolling.
1 year ago
1 score