I doubt that qualifies as an unbiased poll on a random selection of the population.

If you took a random selection of people, you would have a large percentage who has no idea who the ADL is. Furthermore, among those who have some idea, very few of them would have any idea why some people hate the ADL due to all the disgusting things they have done throughout their existence -- starting with being formed to provide legal assistance for someone who kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered a girl, and defended him ONLY because he was a jew.

A random selection of people have no idea who the ADL are, or what they are really all about.

This poll, OTOH, is most likely made up of people who do know. A poll of people who are educated on a particular subject is more valid that a poll of random know-nothings, IMO.

Regardless, X should absolutely not ban ...

Generally speaking, nobody should swing their arms and punch you in the face. But if someone does it anyway, then you have every right to punch back, and punch back harder.

When the ADL is CONSTANTLY trying to censor and get people banned, then turnabout is fair play.

I stand for free speech. But as soon as a particular person or group of people make it clear that they want to push censorship, then they SHOULD become a target of censorship themselves.

We should all be made to live by the standards that we ourselves advocate.

If someone loots a store, then their home should be looted.

If someone randomly plays the knock-out game to unsuspecting and defenseless people, then they themselves should be routinely knocked out.

And if someone pushes for censorship, then they should be censored.

I doubt that qualifies as an unbiased poll on a random selection of the population.

If you took a random selection of people, you would have a large percentage who has no idea who the ADL is. Furthermore, among those who have some idea, very few of them would have any idea why some people hate the ADL due to all the disgusting things they have done throughout their existence -- starting with being formed to provide legal assistance for someone who kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered a girl, and defended him ONLY because he was a jew.

A random selection of people have no idea who the ADL are, or what they are really all about.

This poll, OTOH, is most likely made up of people who do know. A poll of people who are educated on a particular subject is more valid that a poll of random know-nothings, IMO.

Regardless, X should absolutely not ban ...

Generally speaking, nobody should swing their arms and punch you in the face. But if someone does it anyway, then you have every right to punch back, and punch back harder.

When the ADL is CONSTANTLY trying to censor and get people banned, then turnabout is fair play.

I stand for free speech. But as soon as a particular person or group of people make it clear that they want to push censorship, then they SHOULD become a target of censorship themselves.

We should all be made to live by the standards that we ourselves advocate. If someone pushes for censorship, then they should be censored.

If someone loots a store, then their home should be looted.

If someone randomly plays the knock-out game to unsuspecting and defenseless people, then they themselves should be routinely knocked out.

I doubt that qualifies as an unbiased poll on a random selection of the population.

If you took a random selection of people, you would have a large percentage who has no idea who the ADL is. Furthermore, among those who have some idea, very few of them would have any idea why some people hate the ADL due to all the disgusting things they have done throughout their existence -- starting with being formed to provide legal assistance for someone who kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered a girl, and defended him ONLY because he was a jew.

A random selection of people have no idea who the ADL are, or what they are really all about.

This poll, OTOH, is most likely made up of people who do know. A poll of people who are educated on a particular subject is more valid that a poll of random know-nothings, IMO.

Regardless, X should absolutely not ban ...

Generally speaking, nobody should swing their arms and punch you in the face. But if someone does it anyway, then you have every right to punch back, and punch back harder.

When the ADL is CONSTANTLY trying to censor and get people banned, then turnabout is fair play.

I stand for free speech. But as soon as a particular person or group of people make it clear that they want to push censorship, then they SHOULD become a target of censorship themselves.

I doubt that qualifies as an unbiased poll on a random selection of the population.

If you took a random selection of people, you would have a large percentage who has no idea who the ADL is. Furthermore, among those who have some idea, very few of them would have any idea why some people hate the ADL due to all the disgusting things they have done throughout their existence -- starting with being formed to provide legal assistance for someone who kidnapped, tortured, raped, and murdered a girl, and defended him ONLY because he was a jew.

A random selection of people have no idea who the ADL are, or what they are really all about.

This poll, OTOH, is most likely made up of people who do know. A poll of people who are educated on a particular subject is more valid that a poll of random know-nothings, IMO.

Regardless, X should absolutely not ban ...

Generally speaking, nobody should swing their arms and punch you in the face. But is someone does that, then you have every right to punch back, and punch back harder.

When the ADL is CONSTANTLY trying to censor and get people banned, then turnabout is fair play.

I stand for free speech. But as soon as a particular person or group of people make it clear that they want to push censorship, then they SHOULD become a target of censorship themselves.