If everyone speaks freely, then there is no problem

But THAT is NOT happening, which is WHY it is a problem.

If censorship of any kind is going on, overt or hidden, it's a real problem

And what would you propose to do about that, especially when the other side is successful in banning the ability to respond with free speech?

but if everyone is truly free to speak, the problem takes care of itself.

Again, when only ONE side acts in a moral and just way, what do we do about the side who refuses to do so AND is able to censor the other side?

Regardless however, preventing someone from speaking at all, no matter who they are, is not a victory but a loss.

One thing I have come to realize the past couple of years is that some of these philosophical ideas about liberty must be kept in CONTEXT.

As John Adams said, America was founded for a MORAL people. If everyone was acting in a moral way, then we wouldn't need many laws at all.

But not everyone does. And when one side is able to squelch the free speech rights of the other side, we have to have a SOLUTION that actually can work in the REAL WORLD.

ADL has been acting OUTSIDE of the framework of morality. AND they have had some success in shutting down the free speech of others.

Therefore, IMO, it is morally just to shut down their free speech.

What OTHER solution would you suggest? And before you give your answer, I have to tell you this: YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY ANYTHING AGAINST MY POSITION, BECAUSE YOUR POST WILL BE DELETED.

Get the picture? That is the problem we face with disgusting people like those who run the ADL.

If everyone speaks freely, then there is no problem

But THAT is NOT happening, which is WHY it is a problem.

If censorship of any kind is going on, overt or hidden, it's a real problem

And what would you propose to do about that, especially when the other side is successful in banning the ability to respond with free speech?