You make a fantastic point. Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.  

"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."

I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit that the families of the Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones. Making Alex Jones 'own' the news he reported, confronting and harassing him on the street, and reporting him in a very negative light was to make Alex Jones look dangerous. Where else are we seeing this being used? Yes, the same tactic is being used against DJT.

The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.

The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.

You make a fantastic point. Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.  

"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."

I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit that the families of the Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones. Making Alex Jones 'own' the news he reported, confronting and harassing him on the street, and reporting him in a very negative light was to make Alex Jones look dangerous. Where else are we seeing this being used?

The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.

The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.

You make a fantastic point. Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.  

"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."

I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit that the families of the Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones. Making Alex Jones 'own' the news he reported, confronting and harassing on the street, and reporting him in a very negative light was to make Alex Jones look dangerous. Where else are we seeing this being used?

The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.

The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.

You make a fantastic point. Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.  

"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."

I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit that the families of the Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones.

The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.

The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.