IMHO, the old saying that states, "You're preaching to the choir" is to me somewhat fitting for the post. No one is really denying that this is a possibility. Personally, I believe the possibility of it, but also recognize this has next to no feet to travel with the public. I believe we saw how harmful the DEW narrative turned out to be in Paradise, CA, to which some people claimed DEWs were used there too. It won't matter how many blue cars and umbrellas are photographed unscathed. This narrative is already a lost battle with the greater public. Why do I say this?

Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' and a 'conspiracy theorist' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual development and behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.  

"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."

I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit from the families of Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones. Making Alex Jones 'own' the news he reported, confronting and harassing him on the street, and reporting him in a very negative light was to make Alex Jones look dangerous. This was used in the lawsuit against him to paint him as a being 'dangerous' and a menace to society. That successful operation cost AJ over a billion dollars. Where else are we seeing this being used? Yes, the same tactic is being used against DJT.

The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.

The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.

IMHO, the old saying that states, "You're preaching to the choir here" is to me somewhat fitting for the post. No one is really denying that this is a possibility. I believe we saw how utterly harmful the DEW narrative turned out to be in Paradise, CA. It won't matter how many blue cars and umbrellas are photographed. This narrative is already a lost battle with the greater public. Why do I say this?

Pushing the DEW narrative essentially arms our enemy with the excuse for shutting down the Internet. The government's use of 'plausible deniability' is very powerful and effective. I recall the Paradise, CA anomalies and many people pointing out that DEWs were used. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' and a 'conspiracy theorist' for bringing up the subject. Look at how the MSM handled the Paradise, CA conspiracies". The CA state officials used this "dangerous" 'conspiracy theory' to discredit and censor any discussion of it. This reminds me of how Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for saying the, 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on the herbicide Atrazine. It's run off into the water shed was causing inhibition of male sexual development and behavior "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.  

"with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[51] and an endocrine disruptor."

I believe this was an important Alinsky operation for making Jones 'own' the statement he publicly made that led to his being set up for the lawsuit from the families of Sandy Hook made against Alex Jones. Making Alex Jones 'own' the news he reported, confronting and harassing him on the street, and reporting him in a very negative light was to make Alex Jones look dangerous. This was used in the lawsuit against him to paint him as a being 'dangerous' and a menace to society. That successful operation cost AJ over a billion dollars. Where else are we seeing this being used? Yes, the same tactic is being used against DJT.

The point I'm making here with the DEWs narrative is that, It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in these cases, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to..... especially for the government to do so.

The vast majority of Americans are sheep and will not believe in something that the government doesn't publicly admit exists. It's the 'plausible deniability' tactic that the government so effectively uses. I'm still trying to decipher why so many people still want to believe in government lies when everything told to them today is more lies. It's like believing that Lucifer, who is the father of lies, somehow won't ever deceive them. Yet, this is where we are at.