allegation of fraud is not sufficient to overturn a previously settled legal process
Is an allegation of fraud ever sufficient to overturn anything? Or does it require PROOF of the fraud?
Stealing a presidential election in an elaborately orchestrated coup d'état is an act of treason. So, is that stolen election really a "previously settled legal process"? Can anything blatantly and patently ILLEGAL, such as treason, ever be a settled LEGAL process?
allegation of fraud is not sufficient to overturn a previously settled legal process
Is an allegation of fraud ever sufficient to overturn anything? Or does it require PROOF of the fraud?
And, is a stolen election really a "previously settled legal process"? Can anything blatantly and patently ILLEGAL ever be a settled LEGAL process?