"Why should Lindell submit to tyranny?"

I like Mike Lindell and I think he is an American hero. Now, that I have that out of the way, you are correct this is lawfare. His lawyer should know this. By the negligence of Mike Lindell's counsel, I question his attorney's motives. IMHO, Mike Lindell's lawyer has egregiously failed him. The court may use Lindell's remarks against him. I've seen this happen in more than a few court cases. In one case, the respondent made an innocuous off-the-cuff joke about the judge. Everyone knew it was a joke. Yet, the opposing counsel heard it and reported it to the judge. As a result, he was was found to be in contempt of court and jailed. The judge was lenient on him and almost charged him for a felony of threatening a judge. It was ridiculous because everyone there knew it was joke. The lesson is to be guarded in what you say when you are in their jurisdiction.

The way the courts work is that they abide by 'admiralty Law'. You might think this is non-sense, but it's really not. Not many people know this either. Anyone responding to a motion to the corporate court is prima facie evidence of submitting to their jurisdiction. I don't know if Mike Lindell attempted to resolve this matter through arbitration and keeping the matter out of a court room. I simply don't know. The deposition seems to provide an indication of this as not being the case though. His lawyer should have insisted on offering arbitration as a path to dismiss this case. In 95% of civil cases, the settlement is reached through arbitration. In any lawsuit, all means of trying to resolve it outside of the court is expected and highly recommended. The biggest mistake anyone can make is going directly to court without attempting to find remedy through arbitration. Arbitration doesn't necessarily mean accepting fault. An adept lawyer will use arbitration negotiations to both delay and bleed the pursuant monetarily for accruing lawyer costs. The idea is to make it as slow and financially draining as possible. Mike Lindell most likely has an attorney already on his pay roll. So, it doesn't cost him much more than the salary his corporate attorney already is receiving. Going directly to court always equates to entering the lion's den. It's paramount to avoid going to court and instead resolve all issues outside of it through arbitration. The bible tells us we need to be as wise as a serpent in dealing with the **evil one'. Mike has submitted to the courts jurisdiction. He has to play by the rules of the court no matter how corrupt it is. His lawyer did a great disservice to Mike by not immediately stopping this travesty before it occurred. His lawyer allowed it by his silence.

"It is time we hold the minions of evil with the same utter contempt and disdain." Can you tell us how you would proceed doing this?

"Why should Lindell submit to tyranny?"

I like Mike Lindell and I think he is an American hero. Now, that I have that out of the way, you are correct this is lawfare. His lawyer should know this. By the negligence of Mike Lindell's counsel, I question his attorney's motives. IMHO, Mike Lindell's lawyer has egregiously failed him. The court may use Lindell's remarks against him. I've seen this happen in more than a few court cases. In one case, the respondent made an innocuous off-the-cuff joke about the judge. Everyone knew it was a joke. Yet, the opposing counsel heard it and reported it to the judge. As a result, he was was found to be in contempt of court and jailed. The judge was lenient on him and almost charged him for a felony of threatening a judge. It was ridiculous because everyone there knew it was joke. The lesson is to be guarded in what you say when you are in their jurisdiction.

The way the courts work is that they abide by 'admiralty Law'. You might think this is non-sense, but it's really not. Not many people know this either. Anyone responding to a motion to the corporate court is prima facie evidence of submitting to their jurisdiction. I don't know if Mike Lindell attempted to resolve this matter through arbitration and keeping the matter out of a court room. I simply don't know. The deposition seems to provide an indication of this as not being the case though. His lawyer should have insisted on offering arbitration as a path to dismiss this case. In 95% of civil cases, the settlement is reached through arbitration. In any lawsuit, all means of trying to resolve it outside of the court is expected and highly recommended. The biggest mistake anyone can make is going directly to court without attempting to find remedy through arbitration. Arbitration doesn't necessarily mean accepting fault. An adept lawyer will use arbitration negotiations to both delay and bleed the pursuant monetarily for ringing-up lawyer his costs. The idea is to make it as slow and financially draining as possible. Mike Lindell most likely has an attorney already on his pay roll. So, it doesn't cost him much more than the salary his corporate attorney already is receiving. Going directly to court always equates to entering the lion's den. It's paramount to avoid going to court and instead resolve all issues outside of it through arbitration. The bible tells us we need to be as wise as a serpent in dealing with the **evil one'. Mike has submitted to the courts jurisdiction. He has to play by the rules of the court no matter how corrupt it is. His lawyer did a great disservice to Mike by not immediately stopping this travesty before it occurred. His lawyer allowed it by his silence.

"It is time we hold the minions of evil with the same utter contempt and disdain." Can you tell us how you would proceed doing this?