You're engaging in cognitive dissonance to support something you have believed, wrongly, for too long.

Rhetorical question:

Regarding the witnesses, can you prove that they were not CIA plants?

It is on you to prove THEY WERE, not on me to prove they were not.

There are too many people who say they saw an explosion with no plane.

Hold on.... how do you know these people were not CIA plants??!!

However, I will easily answer that question >> Their perspectives were obscured by tall buildings, including the WTC. I would guess a great number of people saw a unique version of the impact, many only seeing the explosion and not the drone.

You're engaging in cognitive dissonance to support something you have believed, wrongly, for too long.

Rhetorical question:

Regarding the witnesses, can you prove that they were not CIA plants? It is on you to prove THEY WERE, not on me to prove they were not.

There are too many people who say they saw an explosion with no plane. Hold on.... how do you know these people were not CIA plants??!!

However, I will easily answer that question >> Their perspectives were obscured by tall buildings, including the WTC. I would guess a great number of people saw a unique version of the impact, many only seeing the explosion and not the drone.