This is very good news. In fact, it is for this reason open and concealed carry laws requiring permits (permission) should be eliminated and found unconstitutional.

The reason Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham thought she could "boldly" trample on the 2nd Amendment is because of the unconstitutional laws already in the books requiring permission to carry a firearm. Permits and licenses are a government privilege. Have you ever heard a police officer or a magistrate in traffic court say that driving a vehicle is a "privilege"? It's because of the voluntary acceptance of a license. This falls in the commerce domain. Permits and licenses to carry a firearm also fall into the commerce domain. The Marxist leftists have been using Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution to justify penalizing and thereby impeding such a right that is clearly articulated in the U.S. Constitution. That is, "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among states, and with the Indian tribes.”

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other." - Matthew 6:24

Do you see the conflict here? The commerce clause was never meant to impede an individual right. It is for this reason supreme court justice Clarence Thomas believed that the commerce clause needs to be revisited. The U.S. Constitution cannot be used against itself to penalize a Right already acknowledged in the U.S. Constitution. The abuses pursued through the commerce clause has caused a great harm to this nation.

This is very good news. In fact, it is for this reason open and concealed carry laws requiring permits (permission) should be eliminated and found unconstitutional.

The reason Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham thought she could "boldly" trample on the 2nd Amendment is because of the unconstitutional laws already in the books requiring permission to carry a firearm. Permits and licenses are a government privilege. Have you ever heard a police officer or a magistrate in traffic court say that driving a vehicle is a "privilege"? It's because of the voluntary acceptance of a license. This falls in the commerce domain. Permits and licenses to carry a firearm also fall into the commerce domain. The Marxist leftists have been using Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution to justify penalizing and thereby impeding such a right that is clearly articulated in the U.S. Constitution. That is, "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among states, and with the Indian tribes.”

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other." - Matthew ^:24

Do you see the conflict here? The commerce clause was never meant to impede an individual right. It is for this reason supreme court justice Clarence Thomas believed that the commerce clause needs to be revisited. The U.S. Constitution cannot be used against itself to penalize a Right already acknowledged in the U.S. Constitution. The abuses pursued through the commerce clause has caused a great harm to this nation.

This is very good news. In fact, it is for this reason open and concealed carry laws requiring permits (permission) should be eliminated and found unconstitutional.

The reason Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham thought she could "boldly" trample on the 2nd Amendment is because of the unconstitutional laws already in the books requiring permission to carry a firearm. Permits and licenses are a government privilege. Have you ever heard a police officer or a magistrate in traffic court say that driving a vehicle is a "privilege"? It's because of the voluntary acceptance of a license. This falls in the commerce domain. Permits and licenses to carry a firearm also fall into the commerce domain. The Marxist leftists have been using Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution to justify penalizing and thereby impeding such a right that is clearly articulated in the U.S. Constitution. That is, "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among states, and with the Indian tribes.”

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other."

Do you see the conflict here? The commerce clause was never meant to impede an individual right. It is for this reason supreme court justice Clarence Thomas believed that the commerce clause needs to be revisited. The U.S. Constitution cannot be used against itself to penalize a Right already acknowledged in the U.S. Constitution. The abuses pursued through the commerce clause has caused a great harm to this nation.

This is very good news. In fact, it is for this reason open and concealed carry laws requiring permits (permission) should be eliminated and found unconstitutional.

The reason Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham thought she could "boldly" trample on the 2nd Amendment is because of the unconstitutional laws already in the books requiring permission to carry a firearm. Permits and licenses are a government privilege. Have you ever heard a police officer or a magistrate in traffic court say that driving a vehicle is a "privilege"? It's because of the voluntary acceptance of a license. This falls in the commerce domain. Permits and licenses to carry a firearm also fall into the commerce domain. The Marxist leftists have been using Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution to justify penalizing and thereby impeding such a right that is clearly articulated in the U.S. Constitution, that is, "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among states, and with the Indian tribes.”

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other."

Do you see the conflict here? The commerce clause was never meant to impede an individual right. It is for this reason supreme court justice Clarence Thomas believed that the commerce clause needs to be revisited. The U.S. Constitution cannot be used against itself to penalize a Right already acknowledged in the U.S. Constitution. The abuses pursued through the commerce clause has caused a great harm to this nation.

This is very good news. In fact, it is for this reason open and concealed carry laws requiring permits (permission) should be eliminated and found unconstitutional.

The reason Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham thought she could "boldly" trample on the 2nd Amendment is because of the unconstitutional laws already in the books requiring permission to carry a firearm. Permits and licenses are a government privilege. Have you ever heard from a police officer or in traffic court that driving a vehicle is a privilege? It's because of acceptance of a license. This is in commerce domain. Permits and licenses to carry a firearm also fall into the commerce domain. The Marxist leftists have been using Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution to justify penalizing and thereby impeding such a right that is clearly articulated in the U.S. Constitution, that is, "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among states, and with the Indian tribes.”

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other."

Do you see the conflict here? The commerce clause was never meant to impede an individual right. It is for this reason supreme court justice Clarence Thomas believed that the commerce clause needs to be revisited. The U.S. Constitution cannot be used against itself to penalize a Right already acknowledged in the U.S. Constitution. The abuses pursued through the commerce clause has caused a great harm to this nation.