I don't even know where to start with all this.

I'm sorry that I'm not using the correct pronouns, I mean, name for whatever the people who call themselves Sovereign Citizens want to be called. I originally learned about all that from David Icke's forum board called, "Sovereign Citizens", so I thought that was what they were called. Silly me.

I don't know where you're getting all this anti-law stuff being part of Q. Nothing I've ever read from Q said any of the stuff you're saying.

I even remember when we were all about "Blue Lives Matter" and the "Thin Blue Line".

And yes, I laugh at people whose mouths write checks their asses can't cash. Just like I laugh when BLM protesters get what they deserve. Are you going to pretend you're supporting all those BLM protesters when they don't comply with the cops and get taken down?

This is what I was talking about on another thread here today. The blatant hypocrisy. You back those people that I don't know how to identify other than Sovereign Citizens for not being sheep and "standing up for their rights" and not complying with law enforcement. But I will bet anything that you aren't on the side of BLM, who are doing virtually the same thing. Breaking laws and resisting law enforcement because they don't agree with the rules and laws we're supposed to all live by. They just do it without all the pseudo-legal gibberish.

Edited to add:

I 100% support people who are fighting against unjust treatment by the government. But I disagree with you on what is considered "unjust treatment".

I'm going to take a shot in the dark here concerning all the "jurisdiction" comments in your post. No matter what state, county, or city you're a legal resident of, you still must comply with the laws of other states if you are physically in that state. Even if you are simply traveling. I do not think it's unjust treatment for someone to be pulled over for traffic violations in States they are not a resident of.

But for people whose rights have actually been violated, I support them 100%. I think they have every right to defend themselves. In a legal way. And preferably in a way that will work. And all the stuff that is spouted by "That Group" DOES NOT WORK. And more often than not results in additional fines and time served.

But prove me wrong. Give me the name of a case that someone had dropped or won thanks to the tactics of that group that must not be named.

I'll wait.

I don't even know where to start with all this.

I'm sorry that I'm not using the correct pronouns, I mean, name for whatever the people who call themselves Sovereign Citizens want to be called. I originally learned about all that from David Icke's forum board called, "Sovereign Citizens", so I thought that was what they were called. Silly me.

I don't know where you're getting all this anti-law stuff being part of Q. Nothing I've ever read from Q said any of the stuff you're saying.

I even remember when we were all about "Blue Lives Matter" and the "Thin Blue Line".

And yes, I laugh at people whose mouths write checks their asses can't cash. Just like I laugh when BLM protesters get what they deserve. Are you going to pretend you're supporting all those BLM protesters when they don't comply with the cops and get taken down?

This is what I was talking about on another thread here today. The blatant hypocrisy. You back those people that I don't know how to identify other than Sovereign Citizens for not being sheep and "standing up for their rights" and not complying with law enforcement. But I will bet anything that you aren't on the side of BLM, who are doing virtually the same thing. Breaking laws and resisting law enforcement because they don't agree with the rules and laws we're supposed to all live by. They just do it without all the pseudo-legal gibberish.

Edited to add:

I 100% support people who are fighting against unjust treatment by the government. But I disagree with you on what is considered "unjust treatment".

I'm going to take a shot in the dark here concerning all the "jurisdiction" comments in your post. No matter what state, county, or city you're a legal resident of, you still must comply with the laws of other states if you are physically in that state. Even if you are simply traveling. I do not think it's unjust treatment for someone to be pulled over for traffic violations in States they are not a resident of.

But for people whose rights have actually been violated, I support them 100%. I think they have every right to defend themselves. On a legal way. And preferably in a way that will work. And all the stuff that is spouted by "That Group" DOES NOT WORK. And more often than not results in additional fines and time served.

But prove me wrong. Give me the name of a case that someone had dropped or won thanks to the tactics of that group that must not be named.

I'll wait.

I don't even know where to start with all this.

I'm sorry that I'm not using the correct pronouns, I mean, name for whatever the people who call themselves Sovereign Citizens want to be called. I originally learned about all that from David Icke's forum board called, "Sovereign Citizens", so I thought that was what they were called. Silly me.

I don't know where you're getting all this anti-law stuff being part of Q. Nothing I've ever read from Q said any of the stuff you're saying.

I even remember when we were all about "Blue Lives Matter" and the "Thin Blue Line".

And yes, I laugh at people whose mouths write checks their asses can't cash. Just like I laugh when BLM protesters get what they deserve. Are you going to pretend you're supporting all those BLM protesters when they don't comply with the cops and get taken down?

This is what I was talking about on another thread here today. The blatant hypocrisy. You back those people that I don't know how to identify other than Sovereign Citizens for not being sheep and "standing up for their rights" and not complying with law enforcement. But I will bet anything that you aren't on the side of BLM, who are doing virtually the same thing. Breaking laws and resisting law enforcement because they don't agree with the rules and laws we're supposed to all live by. They just do it without all the pseudo-legal gibberish.