My understanding is that the United States is the only nation as not being a signatory of the Nuremberg Accord. However, the laws enacted in the United States have for the most part replicated the Accord. Notwithstanding, the Patriot Act has nullified these laws.... so, in the end it works out the same way.

From the beginning I've said the Patriot Act must be ended before the United States can return to a constitutional form of government. The Patriot Act essentially declared war against the American people. The so called, 'War on Terror' is a declaration of war on human behavior (i.e. hate, fear, etc.) There is no legal limits on describing what 'terrorism' is. We are beginning to realize this by how it is being used against innocent Americans. No longer is war declared on governments.

What specifically constitutes 'terrorism'? Who is specifically the enemy?

Terrorism is not ever really defined. It can be anywhere, anyone, at anytime. The root word for 'terrorism' is 'terror' and is defined when a person or people feels "intense, sharp, overmastering fear", whether real or not. In other words, it is a psychological state of mind. It is impossible to declare war on an psychological state of mind. Yet, this is precisely what has occurred. The word terrorist is constantly evolving and now can mean a person or thing that is especially annoying or unpleasant to an opposing party.

The 'war on terrorism' is actually a PsyOp used on the American people. In my research, I believe I found it's origins in the trillion dollar divorce industry used by lawyers to weaponize parental custody battles. Yes, you heard me right. As incredible as this sounds, there is a huge payoff for lawyers and anyone involved in this industry. As it so often turns out, following the money leads us to the source.

Many years ago I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse, which has been federalized through the 'Violence Against Women's Act' (VAWA). Former senator Joe Biden had a central role in passing VAWA into law. By the way, this Act is a page taken straight out of the goals of communism. At the time, few Americans probably thought that the goals of communism that shaped the Iron Curtain’s socialist countries ruled by the Communist Party and the Soviet satellite countries around the world would become the blueprint of our American society in 2023. It has. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? IMHO, the Patriot Act used VAWA as a guide for its creation. Let me explain how this came about. Consequentially, the requirement is to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. We have seen this with the Patriot Act as well. Here is a very recent example of a stewardess having 'wrong' think accused of being a "terrorist". Once added to the 'No-Fly' List, it's next to impossible to be removed. Returning to the VAWA and it's growing use, even Donald Trump has been forced to proof his innocence against an alleged 'incident' involving E. Jean Carroll occurring some 30 years ago. Incredibly, the date and time of the alleged act wasn't legally required. It's hard to present any defense at all without knowing the time and date of the alleged incident. To this day, the accuser hasn't provided the date and time of the alleged matter. All that mattered was her accusation for gaining a ruling against Trump.

Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male.

After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.

Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.

The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.

My understanding is that the United States is the only nation as not being a signatory of the Nuremberg Accord. However, the laws enacted in the United States have for the most part replicated the Accord. Notwithstanding, the Patriot Act has nullified these laws.... so, in the end it works out the same way.

From the beginning I've said the Patriot Act must be ended before the United States can return to a constitutional form of government. The Patriot Act essentially declared war against the American people. The so called, 'War on Terror' is a declaration of war on human behavior (i.e. hate, fear, etc.) There is no legal limits on describing what 'terrorism' is. We are beginning to realize this by how it is being used against innocent Americans. No longer is war declared on governments.

What specifically constitutes 'terrorism'? Who is specifically the enemy?

Terrorism is not ever really defined. It can be anywhere, anyone, at anytime. The root word for 'terrorism' is 'terror' and is defined when a person or people feels "intense, sharp, overmastering fear", whether real or not. In other words, it is a psychological state of mind. It is impossible to declare war on an psychological state of mind. Yet, this is precisely what has occurred. The word terrorist is constantly evolving and now can mean a person or thing that is especially annoying or unpleasant to an opposing party.

The 'war on terrorism' is actually a PsyOp used on the American people. In my research, I believe I found it's origins in the trillion dollar divorce industry used by lawyers to weaponize parental custody battles. Yes, you heard me right. As incredible as this sounds, there is a huge payoff for lawyers and anyone involved in this industry. As it so often turns out, following the money leads us to the source.

Many years ago I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse, which has been federalized through the 'Violence Against Women's Act' (VAWA). Former senator Joe Biden had a central role in passing VAWA into law. By the way, this Act is a page taken straight out of the goals of communism. At the time, few Americans probably thought that the goals of communism that shaped the Iron Curtain’s socialist countries ruled by the Communist Party and the Soviet satellite countries around the world would become the blueprint of our American society in 2023. It has. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? IMHO, the Patriot Act used VAWA as a guide for its creation. Let me explain how this came about. Consequentially, the requirement is to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. We have seen this with the Patriot Act as well. Here is a very recent example of a stewardess having 'wrong' think accused of being a "terrorist". Once added to the 'No-Fly' List, it's next to impossible to be removed. Returning to the VAWA and it's growing use, even Donald Trump has been forced to proof his innocence against an alleged 'incident' involving E. Jean Carroll occurring some 30 years ago. Incredibly, the date and time of the alleged incident wasn't legally required. It's hard to present any defense at all without knowing the time and date of the alleged incident.To this day, the accuser hasn't provided the date and time of the alleged incident. All that mattered was her accusation for gaining a ruling against Trump.

Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male.

After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.

Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.

The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.

My understanding is that the United States is the only nation as not being a signatory of the Nuremberg Accord. However, the laws enacted in the United States have for the most part replicated the Accord. Notwithstanding, the Patriot Act has nullified these laws.... so, in the end it works out the same way.

From the beginning I've said the Patriot Act must be ended before the United States can return to a constitutional form of government. The Patriot Act essentially declared war against the American people. The so called, 'War on Terror' is a declaration of war on human behavior (i.e. hate, fear, etc.) There is no legal limits on describing what 'terrorism' is. We are beginning to realize this by how it is being used against innocent Americans. No longer is war declared on governments.

What specifically constitutes 'terrorism'? Who is specifically the enemy?

Terrorism is not ever really defined. It can be anywhere, anyone, at anytime. The root word for 'terrorism' is 'terror' and is defined when a person or people feels "intense, sharp, overmastering fear", whether real or not. In other words, it is a psychological state of mind. It is impossible to declare war on an psychological state of mind. Yet, this is precisely what has occurred. The word terrorist is constantly evolving and now can mean a person or thing that is especially annoying or unpleasant to an opposing party.

The 'war on terrorism' is actually a PsyOp used on the American people. In my research, I believe I found it's origins in the trillion dollar divorce industry used by lawyers to weaponize parental custody battles. Yes, you heard me right. As incredible as this sounds, there is a huge payoff for lawyers and anyone involved in this industry. As it so often turns out, following the money leads us to the source.

Many years ago I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse, which has been federalized through the 'Violence Against Women's Act' (VAWA). Former senator Joe Biden had a central role in passing VAWA into law. By the way, this Act is a page taken straight out of the goals of communism. At the time, few Americans probably thought that the goals of communism that shaped the Iron Curtain’s socialist countries ruled by the Communist Party and the Soviet satellite countries around the world would become the blueprint of our American society in 2023. It has. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? The Patriot Act used VAWA as a guide for its creation. Let me explain how this came about. Consequentially, the requirement is to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. We have seen this with the Patriot Act as well. Here is a very recent example of a stewardess having 'wrong' think accused of being a "terrorist". Once added to the 'No-Fly' List, it's next to impossible to be removed. Returning to the VAWA and it's growing use, even Donald Trump has been forced to proof his innocence against an alleged 'incident' involving E. Jean Carroll occurring some 30 years ago. Incredibly, the date and time of the alleged incident wasn't legally required. It's hard to present any defense at all without knowing the time and date of the alleged incident.To this day, the accuser hasn't provided the date and time of the alleged incident. All that mattered was her accusation for gaining a ruling against Trump.

Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male.

After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.

Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.

It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.

The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.