I agree that not being indicted in and of itself doesn't mean anything. But the fact that Woods is now a prosecution witness against Powell in the Fulton case would seem to mean something. Considering that Powell is a co-defendant with Trump, targeted by the same DS prosecutor, and that a guilty verdict against Powell would add ammunition and weight towards the case against Trump (would hurt Trump, and not help him), why would Woods help the DS try to take down Powell?

I do not think that Woods can accurately be called a 'steadfast supporter' of Trump and MAGA. Trump said get out and vote. Woods actively discouraged people from voting.

Moreover, Woods has continuously and consistently attacked and moved to undermine confidence in many of Trump's allies.

The bar for what qualifies as being 'a steadfast supporter' needs to be higher than rhetoric that espouses full support for Trump and quoting scripture. It has to extend to actions, and whether the net effects of someone's actions benefit DJT and Maga, or undermines them. Anyone, any asset can pose as a full trump supporter. ALL of the shills in the alt media do. But the impact of their actions and what they do, and whether it benefits MAGA or benefits Maga's enemies, that's what really matters.

I agree that not being indicted in and of itself doesn't mean anything. But the fact that Woods is now a prosecution witness against Powell in the Fulton case would seem to mean something. Considering that Powell is a co-defendant with Trump, targeted by the same DS prosecutor, and that a guilty verdict against Powell would add ammunition and weight towards the case against Trump (would hurt Trump, and not help him), why would Woods help the DS try to take down Powell?

I do not think that Woods can accurately be called a 'steadfast supporter' of Trump and MAGA. Trump said get out and vote. Woods actively discouraged people from voting.

Moreover, Woods has continuously and consistenly attacked and moved to undermine confidence in many of Trump's allies.

The bar for what qualifies as being 'a steadfast supporter' needs to be higher than rhetoric that espouses full support for Trump and quoting scripture. It has to extend to actions, and whether the net effects of someone's actions benefit DJT and Maga, or undermines them. Anyone, any asset can pose as a full trump supporter. ALL of the shills in the alt media do. But the impact of their actions and what they do, and whether this benefits MAGA or Maga's enemies, that's what really matters.

I agree that not being indicted in and of itself doesn't mean anything. But the fact that Woods is now a prosecution witness against Powell in the Fulton case does.

I do not think that Woods can accurately be called a 'steadfast supporter' of Trump and MAGA. Trump said get out and vote. Woods actively discouraged people from voting.

Moreover, Woods has continuously and consistenly attacked and moved to undermine confidence in many of Trump's allies.

The bar for what qualifies as being 'a steadfast supporter' needs to be higher than rhetoric that espouses full support for Trump and quoting scripture. It has to extend to actions, and whether the net effects of someone's actions benefit DJT and Maga, or undermines them. Anyone, any asset can pose as a full trump supporter. ALL of the shills in the alt media do. But the impact of their actions and what they do, and whether this benefits MAGA or Maga's enemies, that's what really matters.