ON Lin Wood

He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses.

This is a problem. The evidence is in, including from direct testimony and confession, that the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers at j6 were there (by their own confession, and communications) to incite a trigger of a kinetic Civil War.

That is exactly what the deep state wants. They want a civil war, to trigger maga into things that would then allow them - to justify - to institute the draconian authoritarian control they want. Oldest play in the book. Strike One.

dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant.

As the evidence shows, Jacob Chansley did NOT do anything at all to incite an insurrection or a civil war, which is what the DS agenda was on that day. Nor was he part of the crew that actively pursued that agenda, including proud boys, oath keepers, Azov ukrainians and others.

I saw those posts about him being "a supporter" at BLM rallies, but they were completely inconclusive . Just putting him there doesn't mean he is a supporter at all. Simply, in fact, that he was more than likely there to oppose and expose those antifa, blm operations. It makes ZERO sense that he would go there clearly identifiable as the "Qanon Shamon supporting Antifa/BLM", and THEN attempt to go in to capital on J6 as "Maga". You cannot be both. You've got to be disguised as one or the other.

So why was Wood attempting to paint Chansley as a plant? The extremely weak but emotionally triggering accusations and the 'evidence' they referred to are characteristic of such agitation campaigns, to trigger and agitate people against someone or something. Why did Wood say nothing about the Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually doing the DS work at the time? Strike Two.

Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill.

Wood proclaims the fact that he has NOT been sued by them as proof that his claims are legitimate. What a weak, weak argument. One, why on earth should they bother with such claims (many, many people have made such claims, all across the net) from an inconsequential person, a defamation lawyer from Georgia (who really only came to prominence in the MAGA movement and truth sphere by defending the kid from the Capital)? Wood isn't a publisher, a newspaper. Two, where is the evidence he promised to spill? Where is it all? Surely the wider community should see it? I've not seen it. So where is it? Three, accusations like this are an EASY in with people in the movement who gravitate to salacious accusations about people who trigger their emotions. Strike Three.

I'm glad I revisited this thread and comment of yours. Because I'd forgotten some of the original reasons why I decided long ago who Wood actually is.

They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.

So which is it? Either he is a sincere patriot, willing to fight and sacrifice for truth and his country, and put OUT the evidence and stand up for the truth, or he's not, and he just shuts his mouth and stays quiet, making ALL the accusations, but providing NONE of the actual evidence he SAYS he has.

He's retired now. Is disbarment an issue? Or is he keeping the evidence secret because it's too much trouble, and he fears hurt or death, unlike Christian martyrs throughout history?

There are MILLIONS of ways to get the information out, and its does NOT require a twitter account.

I'll suggest another explanation. Wood has been a DS asset for many years (an interesting quirk being the Jon Benet connection, which in fact may have all been a psyop, but that's another story). He and his handlers saw a chance for him with the Convington case, and he rose to reputation and some level of prominence in the MAGA movement on the basis of taking and winning that case.

But as a DS asset, his mission is to agitate, promulgate confusion and accusation against actual threats (persons, situations who are threats) to the DS.

He constantly appeals to certain sectors of the Truth community and the MAGA community primarily via the mechanism of preaching his own sanctimonious 'beliefs' while accusing, attacking others, lifting up ONLY those who praise him. Making accusations and saying I have all the evidence BUT never providing it, well, who does that sound like? Adam Schiff anyone?

After Nov 3, 2020, his mission was to foment as much discord as possible and assist in the objective of triggering open, civil conflict. Exactly what the DS wanted.

Making accusations, and getting banned from Twitter, etc, are also easy ways to ingratiate himself to his target audience. But a secretive DS asset can just as easily get himself banned as a legitimate anon or patriot. It proves nothing, but is a great 'image'.

According to wiki, Wood "surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment." Who knows if wiki is accurate here or not, but if true, then why? Why would he not willingly allow himself to be disbarred IF he was right, and telling the truth? Backing down, and asking for the easy way out, seems pretty much at contrast with a LOT of wood's rhetorical behavior.

His record with Rittenhouse isn't exactly inspiring, either.

Whichever way one looks at it, How Wood behaves and acts, and works, maps very well on to how an intelligence asset would work to position himself in to places of influence under cover. Pretending to be one thing, and doing it well, to gather support and followers, by saying the right things at the right time. But, as scripture tells us, you shall know them by their fruits.

What has Wood accomplished for MAGA or Truth other than cause dissension, sow distrust, throw out accusations, often at obvious targets, and make himself into the center of an almost "personality cult"-like fixation from a group of fans?

Honest question.

wwg1wga

ON Lin Wood

He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses.

This is a problem. The evidence is in, including from direct testimony and confession, that the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers at j6 were there (by their own confession, and communications) to incite a trigger of a kinetic Civil War.

That is exactly what the deep state wants. They want a civil war, to trigger maga into things that would then allow them - to justify - to institute the draconian authoritarian control they want. Oldest play in the book. Strike One.

dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant.

As the evidence shows, Jacob Chansley did NOT do anything at all to incite an insurrection or a civil war, which is what the DS agenda was on that day. Nor was he part of the crew that actively pursued that agenda, including proud boys, oath keepers, Azov ukrainians and others.

I saw those posts about him being "a supporter" at BLM rallies, but they were completely inconclusive . Just putting him there doesn't mean he is a supporter at all. Simply, in fact, that he was more than likely there to oppose and expose those antifa, blm operations. It makes ZERO sense that he would go there clearly identifiable as the "Qanon Shamon supporting Antifa/BLM", and THEN attempt to go in to capital on J6 as "Maga". You cannot be both. You've got to be disguised as one or the other.

So why was Wood attempting to paint Chansley as a plant? The extremely weak but emotionally triggering accusations and the 'evidence' they referred to are characteristic of such agitation campaigns, to trigger and agitate people against someone or something. Why did Wood say nothing about the Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually doing the DS work at the time? Strike Two.

Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill.

Wood proclaims the fact that he has NOT been sued by them as proof that his claims are legitimate. What a weak, weak argument. One, why on earth should they bother with such claims (many, many people have made such claims, all across the net) from an inconsequential person, a defamation lawyer from Georgia (who really only came to prominence in the MAGA movement and truth sphere by defending the kid from the Capital)? Wood isn't a publisher, a newspaper. Two, where is the evidence he promised to spill? Where is it all? Surely the wider community should see it? I've not seen it. So where is it? Three, accusations like this are an EASY in with people in the movement who gravitate to salacious accusations about people who trigger their emotions. Strike Three.

I'm glad I revisited this thread and comment of yours. Because I'd forgotten some of the original reasons why I decided long ago who Wood actually is.

They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.

So which is it? Either he is a sincere patriot, willing to fight and sacrifice for truth and his country, and put OUT the evidence and stand up for the truth, or he's not, and he just shuts his mouth and stays quiet, making ALL the accusations, but providing NONE of the actual evidence he SAYS he has.

He's retired now. Is disbarment an issue? Or is he keeping the evidence secret because it's too much trouble, and he fears hurt or death, unlike Christian martyrs throughout history?

There are MILLIONS of ways to get the information out, and its does NOT require a twitter account.

I'll suggest another explanation. Wood has been a DS asset for many years (an interesting quirk being the Jon Benet connection, which in fact may have all been a psyop, but that's another story). He and his handlers saw a chance for him with the Convington case, and he rose to reputation and some level of prominence in the MAGA movement on the basis of taking and winning that case.

But as a DS asset, his mission is to agitate, promulgate confusion and accusation against actual threats (persons, situations who are threats) to the DS.

He constantly appeals to certain sectors of the Truth community and the MAGA community primarily via the mechanism of preaching his own sanctimonious 'beliefs' while accusing, attacking others, lifting up ONLY those who praise him. Making accusations and saying I have all the evidence BUT never providing it, well, who does that sound like? Adam Schiff anyone?

After Nov 3, 2020, his mission was to foment as much discord as possible and assist in the objective of triggering open, civil conflict. Exactly what the DS wanted.

Making accusations, and getting banned from Twitter, etc, are also easy ways to ingratiate himself to his target audience. But a secretive DS asset can just as easily get himself banned as a legitimate anon or patriot. It proves nothing, but is a great 'image'.

According to wiki, Wood "surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment." Who knows if wiki is accurate here or not, but if true, then why? Why would he not willingly allow himself to be disbarred IF he was right, and telling the truth? Backing down, and asking for the easy way out, seems pretty much at contrast with a LOT of wood's rhetorical behavior.

His record with Rittenhouse isn't exactly inspiring, either.

Whichever way one looks at it, How Wood behaves and acts, and works, maps very well on to how an intelligence asset would work to position himself in to places of influence under cover. Pretending to be one thing, and doing it well, to gather support and followers, by saying the right things at the right time. But, as scripture tells us, you shall know them by their fruits.

What has Wood accomplished for MAGA or Truth other than cause dissension, sow distrust, throw out accusations, often at obvious targets, and make himself into the center of a personality cult-like worship group?

Honest question.

wwg1wga

ON Lin Wood

He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses.

This is a problem. The evidence is in, including from direct testimony and confession, that the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers at j6 were there (by their own confession, and communications) to incite a trigger of a kinetic Civil War.

That is exactly what the deep state wants. They want a civil war, to trigger maga into things that would then allow them - to justify - to institute the draconian authoritarian control they want. Oldest play in the book. Strike One.

dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant.

As the evidence shows, Jacob Chansley did NOT do anything at all to incite an insurrection or a civil war, which is what the DS agenda was on that day. Nor was he part of the crew that actively pursued that agenda, including proud boys, oath keepers, Azov ukrainians and others.

I saw those posts about him being "a supporter" at BLM rallies, but they were completely inconclusive . Just putting him there doesn't mean he is a supporter at all. Simply, in fact, that he was more than likely there to oppose and expose those antifa, blm operations. It makes ZERO sense that he would go there clearly identifiable as the "Qanon Shamon supporting Antifa/BLM", and THEN attempt to go in to capital on J6 as "Maga". You cannot be both. You've got to be disguised as one or the other.

So why was Wood attempting to paint Chansley as a plant? The extremely weak but emotionally triggering accusations and the 'evidence' they referred to are characteristic of such agitation campaigns, to trigger and agitate people against someone or something. Why did Wood say nothing about the Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually doing the DS work at the time? Strike Two.

Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill.

Wood proclaims the fact that he has NOT been sued by them as proof that his claims are legitimate. What a weak, weak argument. One, why on earth should they bother with such claims (many, many people have made such claims, all across the net) from an inconsequential person, a defamation lawyer from Georgia (who really only came to prominence in the MAGA movement and truth sphere by defending the kid from the Capital)? Wood isn't a publisher, a newspaper. Two, where is the evidence he promised to spill? Where is it all? Surely the wider community should see it? I've not seen it. So where is it? Three, accusations like this are an EASY in with people in the movement who gravitate to salacious accusations about people who trigger their emotions. Strike Three.

I'm glad I revisited this thread and comment of yours. Because I'd forgotten some of the original reasons why I decided long ago who Wood actually is.

They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.

So which is it? Either he is a sincere patriot, willing to fight and sacrifice for truth and his country, and put OUT the evidence and stand up for the truth, or he's not, and he just shuts his mouth and stays quiet, making ALL the accusations, but providing NONE of the actual evidence he SAYS he has.

He's retired now. Is disbarment an issue? Or is he keeping the evidence secret because it's too much trouble, and he fears hurt or death, unlike Christian martyrs throughout history?

There are MILLIONS of ways to get the information out, and its does NOT require a twitter account.

I'll suggest another explanation. Wood has been a DS asset for many years (an interesting quirk being the Jon Benet connection, which in fact may have all been a psyop, but that's another story). He and his handlers saw a chance for him with the Convington case, and he rose to reputation and some level of prominence in the MAGA movement on the basis of taking and winning that case.

But as a DS asset, his mission is to agitate, promulgate confusion and accusation against actual threats (persons, situations who are threats) to the DS.

He constantly appeals to certain sectors of the Truth community and the MAGA community primarily via the mechanism of preaching his own sanctimonious 'beliefs' while accusing, attacking others, lifting up ONLY those who praise him. Making accusations and saying I have all the evidence BUT never providing it, well, who does that sound like? Adam Schiff anyone?

After Nov 3, 2020, his mission was to foment as much discord as possible and assist in the objective of triggering open, civil conflict. Exactly what the DS wanted.

Making accusations, and getting banned from Twitter, etc, are also easy ways to ingratiate himself to his target audience. But a secretive DS asset can just as easily get himself banned as a legitimate anon or patriot. It proves nothing, but is a great 'image'.

According to wiki, Wood "surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment." Who knows if wiki is accurate here or not, but if true, then why? Why would he not willingly allow himself to be disbarred IF he was right, and telling the truth? Backing down, and asking for the easy way out, seems pretty much at contrast with a LOT of wood's rhetorical behavior.

His record with Rittenhouse isn't exactly inspiring, either.

Whichever way one looks at it, the fact is, THIS is how intelligence assets work to position themselves into places of influence under cover. Pretending to be one thing, and doing it well, to gather support and followers, by saying the right things at the right time. But, as scripture tells us, you shall know them by their fruits.

What has Wood accomplished for MAGA or Truth other than cause dissension, sow distrust, throw out accusations, often at obvious targets, and make himself into the center of a personality cult-like worship group?

Honest question.

wwg1wga

ON Lin Wood

He was rallying patriots to near civil war if election wasn't de-certified. He went extreme to try and rally the masses.

This is a problem. The evidence is in, including from direct testimony and confession, that the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers at j6 were there (by their own confession, and communications) to incite a trigger of a kinetic Civil War.

That is exactly what the deep state wants. They want a civil war, to trigger maga into things that would then allow them - to justify - to institute the draconian authoritarian control they want. Oldest play in the book. Strike One.

dropped some major bombs, such as video evidence of Qanon Shamon (bull horns guy) being a shill, and tweeting video footage of Shamon as a supporter at BLM rallies and other things. Calling him out as a plant.

As the evidence shows, Jacob Chansley did NOT do anything at all to incite an insurrection or a civil war, which is what the DS agenda was on that day. Nor was he part of the crew that actively pursued that agenda, including proud boys, oath keepers, Azov ukrainians and others.

I saw those posts about him being "a supporter" at BLM rallies, but they were completely inconclusive . Just putting him there doesn't mean he is a supporter at all. Simply, in fact, that he was more than likely there to oppose and expose those antifa, blm operations. It makes ZERO sense that he would go there clearly identifiable as the Qanon Shamon, and THEN attempt to go in to capital on J6 as "Maga". You cannot be both. You've got to be disguised as one or the other.

So why was Wood attempting to paint Chansley as a plant? The extremely weak but emotionally triggering accusations and the 'evidence' they referred to are characteristic of such agitation campaigns, to trigger and agitate people against someone or something. Why did Wood say nothing about the Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually doing the DS work at the time? Strike Two.

Then blasted pence and r0berts as known pedos and he (Wood) had all the evidence and would spill.

Wood proclaims the fact that he has NOT been sued by them as proof that his claims are legitimate. What a weak, weak argument. One, why on earth should they bother with such claims (many, many people have made such claims, all across the net) from an inconsequential person, a defamation lawyer from Georgia (who really only came to prominence in the MAGA movement and truth sphere by defending the kid from the Capital)? Wood isn't a publisher, a newspaper. Two, where is the evidence he promised to spill? Where is it all? Surely the wider community should see it? I've not seen it. So where is it? Three, accusations like this are an EASY in with people in the movement who gravitate to salacious accusations about people who trigger their emotions. Strike Three.

I'm glad I revisited this thread and comment of yours. Because I'd forgotten some of the original reasons why I decided long ago who Wood actually is.

They were major truth bombs and he had the evidence to prove it, but was silenced by threat and disbarment and probably more, so he kept quiet.

So which is it? Either he is a sincere patriot, willing to fight and sacrifice for truth and his country, and put OUT the evidence and stand up for the truth, or he's not, and he just shuts his mouth and stays quiet, making ALL the accusations, but providing NONE of the actual evidence he SAYS he has.

He's retired now. Is disbarment an issue? Or is he keeping the evidence secret because it's too much trouble, and he fears hurt or death, unlike Christian martyrs throughout history?

There are MILLIONS of ways to get the information out, and its does NOT require a twitter account.

I'll suggest another explanation. Wood has been a DS asset for many years (an interesting quirk being the Jon Benet connection, which in fact may have all been a psyop, but that's another story). He and his handlers saw a chance for him with the Convington case, and he rose to reputation and some level of prominence in the MAGA movement on the basis of taking and winning that case.

But as a DS asset, his mission is to agitate, promulgate confusion and accusation against actual threats (persons, situations who are threats) to the DS.

He constantly appeals to certain sectors of the Truth community and the MAGA community primarily via the mechanism of preaching his own sanctimonious 'beliefs' while accusing, attacking others, lifting up ONLY those who praise him. Making accusations and saying I have all the evidence BUT never providing it, well, who does that sound like? Adam Schiff anyone?

After Nov 3, 2020, his mission was to foment as much discord as possible and assist in the objective of triggering open, civil conflict. Exactly what the DS wanted.

Making accusations, and getting banned from Twitter, etc, are also easy ways to ingratiate himself to his target audience. But a secretive DS asset can just as easily get himself banned as a legitimate anon or patriot. It proves nothing, but is a great 'image'.

According to wiki, Wood "surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment." Who knows if wiki is accurate here or not, but if true, then why? Why would he not willingly allow himself to be disbarred IF he was right, and telling the truth? Backing down, and asking for the easy way out, seems pretty much at contrast with a LOT of wood's rhetorical behavior.

His record with Rittenhouse isn't exactly inspiring, either.

Whichever way one looks at it, the fact is, THIS is how intelligence assets work to position themselves into places of influence under cover. Pretending to be one thing, and doing it well, to gather support and followers, by saying the right things at the right time. But, as scripture tells us, you shall know them by their fruits.

What has Wood accomplished for MAGA or Truth other than cause dissension, sow distrust, throw out accusations, often at obvious targets, and make himself into the center of a personality cult-like worship group?

Honest question.

wwg1wga