Converts are always the most zealous, I guess. Plus, PDJT is the King of Snark.

I read his posts because he does excellent research and connects the dots, as a competent journalist should. As I recall, he didn't necessarily deny the accuracy of Q. He just didn't quote the information since it was an anonymous source, as a competent journalist should. My opinion was that he read the drops and used them to guide his research, which is what Q intended.

At this point, the evidence that Q is legit is indisputable to those who will see it. Newbies are certainly at a disadvantage because they missed all of the drops, proofs, and discussions in real time of the last six years. The reality is that there's no substitute or even a cheat sheet for that, as far as I know. The only way they can be convinced is to go through the same process we did, which is to read the Q drops, read posts here, and look for connections to events.

Converts are always the most zealous, I guess. Plus, PDJT is the King of Snark.

I read his posts because he does excellent research and connects the dots, as a competent journalist should. As I recall, he didn't necessarily deny the accuracy of Q. He just didn't quote the information since it was an anonymous source, as a competent journalist should. My opinion was that he read the drops and used them to guide his research, which is what Q intended.

At this point, the evidence that Q is legit is indisputable to those who will see it. Newbies are certainly at a disadvantage because they missed all of the drops, proofs, and discussions in real time of the last six years. The reality is that there's no substitute or even a cheat sheet for that, as far as I know. My unpopular advice to them is to go back and read the drops or the posts here and do the research for themselves.