you are refusing to accept any other information
I am completely accepting your information. I am then giving direct address and argument against it. You are replying with red herrings and straw man arguments.
For example, yes, sticks and dirt can be useful but are not useful for currency. I agree. But you are assuming in this response that I am suggesting that usefulness is the only quality required for a currency that is used based on real value. I never said that. I only said it was a necessary quality.
Other qualities for a reasonable currency would be portability, durability, and rarity/desirability (it is easier to trade for it than go outside and pick it up).
Interestingly, both marbles and shells fit all four criteria.
Do you read the things that you write? That is exactly what you have been saying the whole time.
I was addressing the second part of the statement:
anybody who says otherwise is wrong
when I said:
nor do I have any idea why you think this is true
I should have been more clear. That was my bad.
you are refusing to accept any other information
I am completely accepting your information. I am then giving direct address and argument against it. You are replying with red herrings and straw man arguments.
For example, yes, sticks and dirt can be useful but are not useful for currency. I agree. But you are assuming in this response that I am suggesting that usefulness is the only quality required for a currency that is used based on real value. I never said that. I only said it was a necessary quality.
Other qualities for a reasonable currency would be portability, durability, and rarity (it is easier to trade for it than go outside and pick it up).
Interestingly, both marbles and shells fit all four criteria.
Do you read the things that you write? That is exactly what you have been saying the whole time.
I was addressing the second part of the statement:
anybody who says otherwise is wrong
when I said:
nor do I have any idea why you think this is true
I should have been more clear. That was my bad.
you are refusing to accept any other information
I am completely accepting your information. I am then giving direct address and argument against it. You are replying with red herrings and straw man arguments.
For example, yes, sticks and dirt can be useful but are not useful for currency. I agree. But you are assuming in this response that I am suggesting that usefulness is the only quality required for a currency that is used based on real value. I never said that. I only said it was a necessary quality.
Other qualities for a reasonable currency would be portability, durability, and rarity.
Interestingly, both marbles and shells fit all four criteria.
Do you read the things that you write? That is exactly what you have been saying the whole time.
I was addressing the second part of the statement:
anybody who says otherwise is wrong
when I said:
nor do I have any idea why you think this is true
I should have been more clear. That was my bad.
you are refusing to accept any other information
I am completely accepting your information. I am then giving direct address and argument against it. You are replying with red herrings and straw man arguments.
For example, yes, sticks and dirt can be useful but are not useful for currency. I agree. But you are assuming in this response that I am suggesting that usefulness is the only quality required for a currency that is used based on real value. I never said that. I only said it was a necessary quality.
Other qualities for a reasonable currency would be portability and durability.
Interestingly, both marbles and shells fit all three criteria.
Do you read the things that you write? That is exactly what you have been saying the whole time.
I was addressing the second part of the statement:
anybody who says otherwise is wrong
when I said:
nor do I have any idea why you think this is true
I should have been more clear. That was my bad.