America has guns. So, how did the Federal Reserve come into being then?

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns, that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery and a deer rifle will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B2 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

This is why Q asks:

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Who is best to conduct the attack?

What is the one force necessary to retain control?

Why does the US Military play such a vital role in this global game of RISK?

The military is the only way to win a war against an entity so deeply entrenched.

America has guns. So, how did the Federal Reserve come into being then?

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery and a deer rifle will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B2 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

This is why Q asks:

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Who is best to conduct the attack?

What is the one force necessary to retain control?

Why does the US Military play such a vital role in this global game of RISK?

The military is the only way to win a war against an entity so deeply entrenched.

America has guns. So, how did the Federal Reserve come into being then?

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery and a deer rifle will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B1 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

This is why Q asks:

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Who is best to conduct the attack?

What is the one force necessary to retain control?

Why does the US Military play such a vital role in this global game of RISK?

The military is the only way to win a war against an entity so deeply entrenched.

America has guns. So, how did the Federal Reserve come into being then?

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery and a deer rifle will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B1 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

This is why Q asks:

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Who is best to conduct the attack?

What is the one force necessary to retain control?

Why does the US Military play such a vital role in this global game of RISK?

The military is the only way.

America has guns. So, how did the Federal Reserve come into being then?

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery and a deer rifle will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B1 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

There is a reason why "the military is the only way."

America has guns. So, how did the Federal Reserve come into being then?

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery and a deer rifle will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B1 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery and a deer rifle will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B1 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Stand off against a B1 Bomber with your thirty ought six. See how that works out for ya.

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the "free," and the home of the idiots who think that bravery will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the free, and the home of the idiots who think that bravery will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tanks that can withstand a nuclear strike, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.

Agreed. The gun control argument is flawed with several bad assumptions.

1. It assumes that because we have guns that we can "defend our freedom." This is false. The military has weapons so far above ours, if it really came down to it, the US Govt could win a war against the people so fast it would make our collective heads spin. Of course, the collective would have a whole lot fewer heads that could spin at that point, which is a deterrent (maybe), but there is no way we, with our hunting rifles and hand guns, could defend ourselves against the true levels of the technology of the US Armed forces. And that's just the tech we know about. Who knows what is really out there.
2. As you reasonably point out, the only thing that us keeping our guns has given us is a more complicated illusion. The Grand Illusion in America is so powerful, we believe that we are free. Nothing could be further from the truth.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Welcome to the land of the free, and the home of the idiots who think that bravery will save them from guided Jericho missiles, tactical nukes, or maybe even Rods from God, or Lasers from Space.