In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this reporting. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card” series. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the anthropological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are very different (from those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identity has located populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this and suggest they are not human?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this reporting. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card” series. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the anthropological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (than those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this reporting. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card” series. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the anthropological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (than those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this reporting. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card” series. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (than those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this reporting. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (than those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (than those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really no evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling to make the claim. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (than those having Neanderthal DNA). It's a thought planted in our minds. Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really any evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends to not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (than those having Neanderthal DNA). Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really any evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation. Or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of the Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (those having Neanderthal DNA). Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really any evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere and in every subject that we find the same pattern occurring. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation, or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of the Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (those having Neanderthal DNA). Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really any evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans?....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere in every subject the same pattern is found. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation, or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of the Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (those having Neanderthal DNA). Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really any evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.

In regards to the Neanderthal.... and the Denisovan information, I have come to a crossroad in interpreting this. Is there Neanderthal DNA in humans....Well, this is what we are being told, but are they correct? It's not that I believe they are incorrect, but the implication is that Neanderthals had sex with homo sapiens (or homo homo sapiens). There's no way of really verifying it one way or the other.

Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique version of 'Intervention Theory', Now, I'm not a fan of the Extraterrestrial Biological Entity intervention narrative. This can be seen by reading my "UFO Disclosure And The Last False Flag Card”. However, Mr. Pye had some very interesting things to say about the archaeological record. It's one big lie. He specifically addresses the Neanderthal issue and says they still exist to day. Not in our DNA per se, but in the world today. I'm sure you'd find his video, 'Everything You Know Is Wrong' very interesting as I did.

Like you, I'm constantly discovering how much we are being lied too. And it is everywhere in every subject the same pattern is found. If this is so, could it be possible that the Neanderthal DNA in humans is a lie too? Maybe it is a misinterpretation, or even if it is true, how did the DNA get there? Is it from some other mechanism besides caveman sex with humans? Microchimerism? I don't know and certainly I can't verify it either. I'm left with recognizing the cause and effect of information like this. Cause and effect is another way of saying, 'problem', 'crisis', 'solution'. The Neanderthal DNA in the human genome tends not uplift humanity as being exceptional and separate from the beasts of the Earth, but rather it does the opposite. Or at least, causes in our subconscious to conceive some of us humans are different (those having Neanderthal DNA). Geographic detection and ethnic identifying has implicated populations most likely having Neanderthal DNA. How long before there is an excuse to persecute people like this?

Over the years, I have found that areas of archaeology is nothing more than educated guesses (hypothesis/theory) portrayed as fact..... In some aspect ii's nothing more than story telling. For example, finding evidence of charred bone in a place that Neanderthal remains were found. There's evidence of a fire, but really any evidence of Neanderthal's making the fire or using it. It amounts to story-telling. IMHO, I think Loyd Pye explains this in very scintillating examination.