I do not think this idea has merit.

They didn't "lose" in Russia, or Ukraine. They won completely. Everything that happened there was exactly by design.

The Rothschilds had been trying to create Israel for at least a hundred years before it actually happened. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I found, in the Niles Almanac (1833 I think?) a statement that one of the Rothschilds (I think Nathan himself0 tried to buy Palestine from the Ottomans for some ridiculous amount of money. The Zionist movement itself is noted as beginning around that time. The Zionist movement is attributed to Abraham Mapu who wrote the "inspirational book" around 1850, but I think it began in earnest quite a bit before that time.

Interestingly, Abraham Mapu was the teacher (at Kovno Gymnasium), and noted most important influence in the life of Mark Natanson, who was one of the most important people in the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Natanson also happens to have been the uncle and surrogate father for Mr. Alexander Berkman, who was the "attempted assassin" for both Henry Frick (of Carnegie steel) and John D. Rockefeller. As it turns out, in both cases it ended up wiping the slate clean of their respective massacres in the media (Homestead massacre and Ludlow massacre respectively), because if you are "the victim" of a (failed) assassination, the media can sell you as "not a perpetrator."

Alexander Berkman also happens to have been BFFs with Margaret Sanger, who of course was a Rockefeller agent.

There is a GREAT DEAL more to that story, but there is only so much time.

Nothing is what it seems. Everything is controlled opposition, and most importantly:

The House Always Wins.

I do not think this idea has merit.

They didn't "lose" in Russia, or Ukraine. They won completely. Everything that happened there was exactly by design.

The Rothschilds had been trying to create Israel for at least a hundred years before it actually happened. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I found, in the Niles Almanac (1833 I think?) a statement that one of the Rothschilds (I think Nathan himself0 tried to buy Palestine from the Ottomans for some ridiculous amount of money. The Zionist movement itself is noted as beginning around that time. The Zionist movement is attributed to Abraham Mapu who wrote the "inspirational book" around 1850, but I think it began in earnest quite a bit before that time.

Interestingly, Abraham Mapu was the teacher (at Kovno Gymnasium), and noted most important influence in the life of Mark Natanson, who was one of the most important people in the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Natanson also happens to have been the uncle and surrogate father for Mr. Alexander Berkman, who was the "attempted assassin" for both Henry Frick (of Carnegie steel) and John D. Rockefeller. As it turns out, in both cases it ended up wiping the slate clean of their respective massacres in the media (Homestead massacre and Ludlow massacre respectively), because if you are "the victim" of an assassination, the media can sell you as "not a perpetrator."

Alexander Berkman also happens to have been BFFs with Margaret Sanger, who of course was a Rockefeller agent.

There is a GREAT DEAL more to that story, but there is only so much time.

Nothing is what it seems. Everything is controlled opposition, and most importantly:

The House Always Wins.

I do not think this idea has merit.

They didn't "lose" in Russia, or Ukraine. They won completely. Everything that happened there was exactly by design.

The Rothschilds had been trying to create Israel for at least a hundred years before it actually happened. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I found, in the Niles Alamanac (1833 I think?) a statement that one of the Rothschilds (I think Nathan himself0 tried to buy Palestine from the Ottomans for some ridiculous amount of money. The Zionist movement itself is noted as beginning around that time. The Zionist movement is attributed to Abraham Mapu who wrote the "inspirational book" around 1850, but I think it began in earnest quite a bit before that time.

Interestingly, Abraham Mapu was the teacher (at Kovno Gymnasium), and noted most important influence in the life of Mark Natanson, who was one of the most important people in the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Natanson also happens to have been the uncle and surrogate father for Mr. Alexander Berkman, who was the "attempted assassin" for both Henry Frick (of Carnegie steel) and John D. Rockefeller. As it turns out, in both cases it ended up wiping the slate clean of their respective massacres in the media (Homestead massacre and Ludlow massacre respectively), because if you are "the victim" of an assassination, the media can sell you as "not a perpetrator."

Alexander Berkman also happens to have been BFFs with Margaret Sanger, who of course was a Rockefeller agent.

There is a GREAT DEAL more to that story, but there is only so much time.

Nothing is what it seems. Everything is controlled opposition, and most importantly:

The House Always Wins.

I do not think this idea has merit.

They didn't "lose" in Russia, or Ukraine. They won completely. Everything that happened there was exactly by design.

The Rothschilds had been trying to create Israel for at least a hundred years before it actually happened. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I found, in the Niles Alamanac (1833 I think?) a statement that one of the Rothschilds (I think Nathan himself0 tried to buy Palestine from the Ottomans for some ridiculous amount of money. The Zionist movement itself is noted as beginning around that time. The Zionist movement is attributed to Abraham Mapu who wrote the "inspirational book" around 1850, but I think it began in earnest quite a bit before that time.

Interestingly, Abraham Mapu was the teacher (at Kovno Gymnasium), and noted most important influence in the life of Mark Natanson, who was one of the most important people in the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Natanson also happens to have been the uncle and surrogate father for Mr. Alexander Berkman, who was the "attempted assassin" for both Henry Frick (of Carnegie steel) and John D. Rockefeller. As it turns out, in both cases it ended up wiping the slate clean of their respective massacres in the media (Homestead massacre and Ludlow massacre respectively), because if you are "the victim" of an assassination, the media can sell you as "not a perpetrator."

Alexander Berkman also happens to have been BFFs with Margaret Sanger, who of course was a Rockefeller agent.

There is a GREAT DEAL more to that story, but there is only so much time.

I do not think this idea has merit.

They didn't "lose" in Russia, or Ukraine. They won completely. Everything that happened there was exactly by design.

The Rothschilds had been trying to create Israel for at least a hundred years before it actually happened. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I found, in the Niles Alamanac (1833 I think?) a statement that one of the Rothschilds (I think Nathan himself0 tried to buy Palestine from the Ottomans for some ridiculous amount of money. The Zionist movement itself is noted as beginning around that time. It is attributed to Abraham Mapu who wrote the "inspirational book" around 1850, but I think it began in earnest quite a bit before that time.

Interestingly, Abraham Mapu was the teacher (at Kovno Gymnasium), and noted most important influence in the life of Mark Natanson, who was one of the most important people in the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Natanson also happens to have been the uncle and surrogate father for Mr. Alexander Berkman, who was the "attempted assassin" for both Henry Frick (of Carnegie steel) and John D. Rockefeller. As it turns out, in both cases it ended up wiping the slate clean of their respective massacres in the media (Homestead massacre and Ludlow massacre respectively), because if you are "the victim" of an assassination, the media can sell you as "not a perpetrator."

Alexander Berkman also happens to have been BFFs with Margaret Sanger, who of course was a Rockefeller agent.

There is a GREAT DEAL more to that story, but there is only so much time.

I do not think this idea has merit.

They didn't "lose" in Russia, or Ukraine. They won completely. Everything that happened there was exactly by design.

The Rothschilds had been trying to create Israel for at least a hundred years before it actually happened. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I found in the Niles Alamanac (1833 I think?) a statement that one of the Rothschilds (I think Nathan himself0 tried to buy Palestine from the Ottomans for some ridiculous amount of money. The Zionist movement itself is noted as beginning around that time. It is attributed to Abraham Mapu who wrote the "inspirational book" around 1850, but I think it began in earnest quite a bit before that time.

Interestingly, Abraham Mapu was the teacher (at Kovno Gymnasium), and noted most important influence in the life of Mark Natanson, who was one of the most important people in the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Natanson also happens to have been the uncle and surrogate father for Mr. Alexander Berkman, who was the "attempted assassin" for both Henry Frick (of Carnegie steel) and John D. Rockefeller. As it turns out, in both cases it ended up wiping the slate clean of their respective massacres in the media (Homestead massacre and Ludlow massacre respectively), because if you are "the victim" of an assassination, the media can sell you as "not a perpetrator."

Alexander Berkman also happens to have been BFFs with Margaret Sanger, who of course was a Rockefeller agent.

There is a GREAT DEAL more to that story, but there is only so much time.