You are missing the point.

You said:

the Rothschilds learned that financing both sides of wars was very profitable

Then they decided they could increase their money by starting the wars.

I am not disagreeing with these statements, but they imply the supreme importance of money.

Money runs the world

And this corroborates my assessment. You believe that money is the key. I suggest it is the purposeful distraction.

It is not "money" that runs the world. People run the world. In some cases they use money to do it. In other cases they do not. In some cases they purposefully give away money, or lose money, or give away assets, or lives, or even in some cases they give up actual power, to make it appear that they have "lost" when in fact the very act of losing these things has actually increased their control.

The problem I had with what you are implying in the first post, and stating explicitly in the second, is not the idea that money plays an important part, but that it is the actual thing that is "the goal", or that it itself is exerting control, or that "profit" is important to them. When people think these things, they align their investigation with those thoughts, thus when someone "loses money," or "doesn't make a profit" they think, "the bankers lost that one." That is not what a deeper investigation suggests, rather it suggests:

The House Always Wins.

Looking into why people commonly believe in money and profit as supreme, suggests that all such ideas are promoted by the very people themselves who are exerting control. They created the trope of the "evil banker, sitting on his bags of gold" specifically to distract from who is doing what and why. We focus so much on money and "profit", we miss a ton of evidence that shows how the real currency, the real goal, control, is changing hands.

All of the greatest fuckery I've found has very little, or nothing, to do with profit, or money. Thinking of it as anything other than one useful tool keeps people from seeing this greatest fuckery, which is related to the question, "why do people believe what they believe?"

You are missing the point.

You said:

the Rothschilds learned that financing both sides of wars was very profitable

Then they decided they could increase their money by starting the wars.

I am not disagreeing with these statements, but they imply the supreme importance of money.

Money runs the world

And this corroborates my assessment. You believe that money is the key. I suggest it is the purposeful distraction.

It is not "money" that runs the world. People run the world. In some cases they use money to do it. In other cases they do not. In some cases they purposefully give away money, or lose money, or give away assets, or lives, or even in some cases they give up actual power, to make it appear that they have "lost" when in fact the very act of losing these things has actually increased their control.

The problem I had with what you are implying in the first post, and stating explicitly in the second, is not the idea that money plays an important part, but that it is the actual thing that is exerting control, and that "profit" is important to them. When people think these things, they align their investigation with those thoughts, thus when someone "loses money," or "doesn't make a profit" they think, "the bankers lost that one." That is not what a deeper investigation suggests, rather it suggests:

The House Always Wins.

Looking into why people commonly believe in money and profit as supreme, suggests that all such ideas are promoted by the very people themselves who are exerting control. They created the trope of the "evil banker, sitting on his bags of gold" specifically to distract from who is doing what and why. We focus so much on money and "profit", we miss a ton of evidence that shows how the real currency, the real goal, control, is changing hands.

All of the greatest fuckery I've found has very little, or nothing, to do with profit, or money. Thinking of it as anything other than one useful tool keeps people from seeing this greatest fuckery, which is related to the question, "why do people believe what they believe?"

You are missing the point.

You said:

the Rothschilds learned that financing both sides of wars was very profitable

Then they decided they could increase their money by starting the wars.

I am not disagreeing with these statements, but they imply the supreme importance of money.

Money runs the world

And this corroborates my assessment. You believe that money is the key. I suggest it is the purposeful distraction.

It is not "money" that runs the world. People run the world. In some cases they use money to do it. In other cases they do not. In some cases they purposefully give away money, or lose money, or give away assets, or lives, or even in some cases they give up actual power, to make it appear that they have "lost" when in fact the very act of losing these things has actually increased their control.

The problem I had with what you are implying in the first post, and stating explicitly in the second, is not the idea that money plays an important part, but that it is the actual thing that is exerting control, and that "profit" is important to them. When people think these things, they align their investigation with those thoughts, thus when someone "loses money," or "doesn't make a profit" they think, "the bankers lost that one." That is not what a deeper investigation suggests, rather it suggests:

The House Always Wins.

Looking into why people commonly believe in money and profit as supreme, suggests that all such ideas are promoted by the very people themselves who are exerting control. We focus so much on money and "profit", we miss a ton of evidence that shows how the real currency, the real goal, control, is changing hands.

All of the greatest fuckery I've found has very little, or nothing, to do with profit, or money. Thinking of it as anything other than one useful tool keeps people from seeing this greatest fuckery, which is related to the question, "why do people believe what they believe?"

You are missing the point.

You said:

the Rothschilds learned that financing both sides of wars was very profitable

Then they decided they could increase their money by starting the wars.

I am not disagreeing with these statements, but they imply the supreme importance of money.

Money runs the world

And this corroborates my assessment. You believe that money is the key. I suggest it is the purposeful distraction.

It is not "money" that runs the world. People run the world. In some cases they use money to do it. In other cases they do not. In some cases they purposefully give away money, or lose money, or give away assets, or lives, or even in some cases they give up actual power, to make it appear that they have "lost" when in fact the very act of losing these things has actually increased their control.

The problem I had with what you are implying in the first post, and stating explicitly in the second, is not the idea that money plays an important part, but that it is the actual thing that is exerting control, and that "profit" is important to them. When people think these things, they align their investigation with those thoughts, thus when someone "loses money," or "doesn't make a profit" they think, "the bankers lost that one." That is not what a deeper investigation suggests, rather it suggests:

The House Always Wins.

Looking into why people commonly believe in money and profit as supreme suggests that all such statements are promoted by the very people themselves who are exerting control. We focus so much on money and "profit", we miss a ton of evidence that shows how the real currency, the real goal, control, is changing hands.

All of the greatest fuckery I've found has very little, or nothing, to do with profit, or money. Thinking of it as anything other than one useful tool keeps people from seeing this greatest fuckery, which is related to the question, "why do people believe what they believe?"

You are missing the point.

You said:

the Rothschilds learned that financing both sides of wars was very profitable

Then they decided they could increase their money by starting the wars.

I am not disagreeing with these statements, but they imply the supreme importance of money.

Money runs the world

And this corroborates my assessment. You believe that money is the key. I suggest it is the purposeful distraction.

It is not "money" that runs the world. People run the world. In some cases they use money to do it. In other cases they do not. In some cases they purposefully give away money, or lose money, or give away assets, or lives, or even in some cases they give up actual power, to make it appear that they have "lost" when in fact the very act of losing these things has actually increased their control.

The problem I had with what you are implying in the first post, and stating explicitly in the second, is not the idea that money plays an important part, but that it is the actual thing that is exerting control, and that "profit" is important to them. When people think these things, they align their investigation with those thoughts, thus when someone "loses money," or "doesn't make a profit" they think, "the bankers lost that one." That is not what a deeper investigation suggests however, rather, it suggests:

The House Always Wins.

Looking into why people commonly believe in money and profit as supreme suggests that all such statements are promoted by the very people themselves who are exerting control. We focus so much on money and "profit", we miss a ton of evidence that shows how the real currency, the real goal, control, is changing hands.

All of the greatest fuckery I've found has very little, or nothing, to do with profit, or money. Thinking of it as anything other than one useful tool keeps people from seeing this greatest fuckery, which is related to the question, "why do people believe what they believe?"

You are missing the point.

You said:

the Rothschilds learned that financing both sides of wars was very profitable

Then they decided they could increase their money by starting the wars.

I am not disagreeing with these statements, but they imply the supreme importance of money.

Money runs the world

And this corroborates my assessment. You believe that money is the key. I suggest it is the purposeful distraction.

It is not "money" that runs the world. People run the world. In some cases they use money to do it. In other cases they do not. In some cases they purposefully give away money, or lose money, or give away assets, or lives, or even in some cases they give up actual power, to make it appear that they have "lost" when in fact the very act of losing these things has actually increased their control.

The problem I had with what you are implying in the first post, and stating explicitly in the second, is not the idea that money plays an important part, but that it is the actual thing that is exerting control, and that "profit" is important to them. When people think these things, they align their investigation with proving them, thus when someone "loses money," or "doesn't make a profit" they think, "the bankers lost that one." That is not what a deeper investigation suggests however, rather, it suggests:

The House Always Wins.

Looking into why people commonly believe in money and profit as supreme suggests that all such statements are promoted by the very people themselves who are exerting control. We focus so much on money and "profit", we miss a ton of evidence that shows how the real currency, the real goal, control, is changing hands.

All of the greatest fuckery I've found has very little, or nothing, to do with profit, or money. Thinking of it as anything other than one useful tool keeps people from seeing this greatest fuckery, which is related to the question, "why do people believe what they believe?"

You are missing the point.

You said:

the Rothschilds learned that financing both sides of wars was very profitable

Then they decided they could increase their money by starting the wars.

I am not disagreeing with these statements, but they imply the supreme importance of money.

Money runs the world

And this corroborates my assessment. You believe that money is the key. I suggest it is the purposeful distraction.

It is not "money" that runs the world. People run the world. In some cases they use money to do it. In other cases they do not. In some cases they purposefully give away money, or lose money, or give away assets, or lives, or even in some cases they give up actual power, to make it appear that they have "lost" when in fact the very act of losing these things has actually increased their control.

The problem I had with what you are implying in the first post, and stating explicitly in the second, is not the idea that money plays an important part, but that it is the actual thing that is exerting control, and that "profit" is important to them. Looking into why people commonly believe those things suggests that all such statements are promoted by the very people themselves who are exerting control. We focus so much on money and "profit", we miss a ton of evidence that shows how the real currency, the real goal, control, is changing hands.

All of the greatest fuckery I've found has very little, or nothing, to do with profit, or money. Thinking of it as anything other than one useful tool keeps people from seeing this greatest fuckery, which is related to the question, "why do people believe what they believe?"