Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

From all the other 'fantastic' stories coming out of this purported attack, I simple don't believe any of it. Previously, I stated that even the most ardent of Israel supporters are unaware that Hamas was created and funded by Mossad. Former congressman Ron Paul provided this evidence before Congress several years ago. It should be a well-known fact, but it is throttled and censored instead. Hamas was created to undermine Yassir Arafat's influence over Palestinians. The Hamas co-founder's son turns out to be an Israeli spy. From what we now know, should that be any surprise? The question is how much of a Mossad operation is this purported attack? Always remember that the Masonic-Zionist elites will readily throw as many Jews under-the-bus as necessary to advance their evil plans. Innocent Jews are sacrificed repeatedly for advancing the Masonic-Zionist goal of fulfilling the Rothschild dream for a 'Greater Israel' spanning from the Euphrates to the Nile rivers.

The IDF just blamed Syria for attacking Israel with rockets. This narrative was so predictable and it seem all too timely to blame Syria, especially after Israel has repeatedly attacked Syria and violated Syrian airspace destroying its industrial infrastructure and defense. The Damascus government recognizes that Israel has been attempting to get Syria to respond to their unprovoked attacks. Not once in the past has Syria responded though. The Bashar Al-Assad government is busy trying to reclaim territory that has been taken from them and occupied by the United States, the SDF (Kurds), al Queda, and Turkey. Responding to Israel's attacks would be opening up another warring front for Syria. This would be a very formidable front for Syria to contend with. And a situation that Syria would most definitely want to avoid. It doesn't benefit Syria at all. Why would Syria respond by shooting rockets into Israel now? Who actually benefits from these rocket attacks in Israel. Syria certainly does not benefit. Israel however, does benefit if they can foment war. Let's look at the current demarcation lines and the occupation of Syria.

Here is a recent map of military control in Syria. Not much has changed from this 2021-22 map. The one thing I want to point out is the territory under the control of Bashar Al-Assad's government of Damascus. It extends to the Euphrates River. There is a green area labeled as "Syrian Opposition-held Areas" in the southern region, which is an exception to the overall area that Damascus controls. This green area is really under the control of the United States. We have the Al-Tanf military base there. You can see its exact location here. The United States trains and arms al-Qaeda in this region. If any rocket being fired from Syria into Israel, this would most likely be the location to do this. The question is how much of a role did the United States play in this act of terrorism? Another consideration is the presence of Mossad and IDF actors at Al-Tanf. There is an overall important reason why this American military base is located there. I will explain this in a moment, but first let's go back to the Euphrates river demarcation line that divides the Syrian government controlled area from all the other 'opposition-held' areas located on the "east side" of the Euphrates river. On this "east side" of the Euphrates river Turkey and the US-Israeli proxy Kurds are in control of that region. The Euphrates river as a military demarcation line is very significant and political and military maneuvering repeatedly spells this out. In fact, Turkey has warned the Kurds that crossing the Euphrates was a "red-line" to Turkey. Why? Let's briefly examine Turkey's history to answer this. Turkey has been always hostile to Syria and observes it as part of its Ottoman Syria past. In Ottoman times, Hatay was part of the Vilayet of Aleppo in Ottoman Syria. In 1937, Turkey annexed Syria's province of Hatay. Even the city of Alexandretta (now called İskenderun) was confirmed as Syrian territory in the Treaty of Lausanne agreed upon by Kemal Atatürk but was granted a special autonomous status because it contained a Turkish plurality. Syria bitterly disputed both the separation of Alexandretta and its subsequent annexation to Turkey. The people living anywhere near to Anatolia know the history of Turkish intent for annexing land. All sides including Georgians and Armenians to Greeks to Cypus are always wary of Turkish intentions. It's no different today with the dynamics happening in Syria and Iraq. It's obvious what Ankara's intent is for both northern Syria and Iraq. Many people openly discuss Turkey's imperialism and plans for annexing northern Syria.

You might wonder right now why I am talking about Turkey when Hamas is the kindling for Israel's plan for war. The reason I'm talking about Turkey is this is one of the major players, who will benefit from the fall of the Syrian government. President Erdogan is playing both sides of the Hamas-Israeli conflict. IMHO, Erdogan has a secret deal with Israel over dividing up Syria after the Assad government falls. The planned northern border between Turkey and Israel is at the Euphrates river.

Now, let's examine everything on the west side of the Euphrates river. Why does the United States have a military base on Syrian government territory? Let me answer this by asking another question. Who is allowed to come to the table after a war has been won? It is those countries involved in the war that have already have a stake in the war. It then becomes divvying up the spoils of war. In my opinion, the United States is in Syria for one reason and it amounts to squatter rights. We already have boots on the ground in Syria. The question becomes how involved does the united States military get in this war?

There has been many hostile acts that betrays Israel's intent regarding Syria. It falls under the Israeli political accusations that Iran is present in Syria that it has justification for carrying out aerial attacks against Syrian military installations and its manufacturing infrastructure. Syria has been deprived of most of its oil production. and Turkey, the United States, and Israel has been illegally selling it on the world market. Despite Bashar Al-Assad being an Alawite Shia Muslim and having unanimous support from its Syrian Christians and Druse populations, and [despite] Assad's steadfast non-aggression foreign policy, the Masonic-Zionist elite have already decided to end the Syrian government and divide up its land.

I believe the script that is being followed is the Israeli 'Oded Yinon' Plan for fomenting a "clash of civilizations" between the Muslims and Christianity. In essence, it is the Masonic-Zionist strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority in the Middle East by keeping it's Arab nations feuding and weak. This is precisely what we have occurring in Syria. You can read more about this Here. This, of course, dovetails into the overall 'Greater Israel' blueprint. Through the Neocons; that is, Israel’s 5th column in the U.S. (which include AIPAC and other Zionist organizations), the U.S. has been pushed into having ‘boots on the ground’ in Syria and Iraq. I wrote about this in more detail on 12-21-22. The article is entitled, "Is the Rothschild 'Greater Israel' Plan Being Realized?". Let's compare the map of the current military occupation of Syria with the map of the'Greater Israel" plan. Here is the map of the military occupation of Syria as of 2022. Note that the gold region just south of the Al-Raqqah area is now under Syrian control. The Kurds moved north of the Euphrates river.

Now, look at the 'Greater Israel" map as seen Here or Here. As you can see, the Euphrates River is border of the 'Greater Israel' (Eretz Israel). This was the Rothschild plan from the very beginning. It is the reason why Israel's flag has to blue stripes on it. One represents the Euphrates and the other the Nile rivers. Throughout the decades in public documents it shows beyond a shadow of a doubt this has always been the plan in the Middle East. As recently as March 03, 2023, Jordan’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Sinan Majali slammed the Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich when he addressed an event in Paris while standing by a map of greater Israel portraying Jordan as part of the self-proclaimed Jewish state.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

From all the other 'fantastic' stories coming out of this purported attack, I simple don't believe any of it. Previously, I stated that even the most ardent of Israel supporters are unaware that Hamas was created and funded by Mossad. Former congressman Ron Paul provided this evidence before Congress several years ago. It should be a well-known fact, but it is throttled and censored instead. Hamas was created to undermine Yassir Arafat's influence over Palestinians. The Hamas co-founder's son turns out to be an Israeli spy. From what we now know, should that be any surprise? The question is how much of a Mossad operation is this purported attack? Always remember that the Masonic-Zionist elites will readily throw as many Jews under-the-bus as necessary to advance their evil plans. Innocent Jews are sacrificed repeatedly for advancing the Masonic-Zionist goal of fulfilling the Rothschild dream for a 'Greater Israel' spanning from the Euphrates to the Nile rivers.

The IDF just blamed Syria for attacking Israel with rockets. This narrative was so predictable and it seem all too timely to blame Syria, especially after Israel has repeatedly attacked Syria and violated Syrian airspace destroying its industrial infrastructure and defense. The Damascus government recognizes that Israel has been attempting to get Syria to respond to their unprovoked attacks. Not once in the past has Syria responded though. The Bashar Al-Assad government is busy trying to reclaim territory that has been taken from them and occupied by the United States, the SDF (Kurds), al Queda, and Turkey. Responding to Israel's attacks would be opening up another warring front for Syria. This would be a very formidable front for Syria to contend with. And a situation that Syria would most definitely want to avoid. It doesn't benefit Syria at all. Why would Syria respond by shooting rockets into Israel now? Who actually benefits from these rocket attacks in Israel. Syria certainly does not benefit. Israel however, does benefit if they can foment war. Let's look at the current demarcation lines and the occupation of Syria.

Here is a recent map of military control in Syria. Not much has changed from this 2021-22 map. The one thing I want to point out is the territory under the control of Bashar Al-Assad's government of Damascus. It extends to the Euphrates River. There is a green area labeled as "Syrian Opposition-held Areas" in the southern region, which is an exception to the overall area that Damascus controls. This green area is really under the control of the United States. We have the Al-Tanf military base there. You can see its exact location here. The United States trains and arms al-Qaeda in this region. If any rocket being fired from Syria into Israel, this would most likely be the location to do this. The question is how much of a role did the United States play in this act of terrorism? Another consideration is the presence of Mossad and IDF actors at Al-Tanf. There is an overall important reason why this American military base is located there. I will explain this in a moment, but first let's go back to the Euphrates river demarcation line that divides the Syrian government controlled area from all the other 'opposition-held' areas located on the "east side" of the Euphrates river. On this "east side" of the Euphrates river Turkey and the US-Israeli proxy Kurds are in control of that region. The Euphrates river as a military demarcation line is very significant and political and military maneuvering repeatedly spells this out. In fact, Turkey has warned the Kurds that crossing the Euphrates was a "red-line" to Turkey. Why? Let's briefly examine Turkey's history to answer this. Turkey has been always hostile to Syria and observes it as part of its Ottoman Syria past. In Ottoman times, Hatay was part of the Vilayet of Aleppo in Ottoman Syria. In 1937, Turkey annexed Syria's province of Hatay. Even the city of Alexandretta (now called İskenderun) was confirmed as Syrian territory in the Treaty of Lausanne agreed upon by Kemal Atatürk but was granted a special autonomous status because it contained a Turkish plurality. Syria bitterly disputed both the separation of Alexandretta and its subsequent annexation to Turkey. The people living anywhere near to Anatolia know the history of Turkish intent for annexing land. All sides including Georgians and Armenians to Greeks to Cypus are always wary of Turkish intentions. It's no different today with the dynamics happening in Syria and Iraq. It's obvious what Ankara's intent is for both northern Syria and Iraq. Many people openly discuss Turkey's imperialism and plans for annexing northern Syria.

You might wonder right now why I am talking about Turkey when Hamas is the kindling for Israel's plan for war. The reason I'm talking about Turkey is this is one of the major players, who will benefit from the fall of the Syrian government. President Erdogan is playing both sides of the Hamas-Israeli conflict. IMHO, Erdogan has a secret deal with Israel over dividing up Syria after the Assad government falls. The planned northern border between Turkey and Israel is at the Euphrates river.

Now, let's examine everything on the west side of the Euphrates river. Why does the United States have a military base on Syrian government territory? Let me answer this by asking another question. Who is allowed to come to the table after a war has been won? It is those countries involved in the war that have already have a stake in the war. It then becomes divvying up the spoils of war. In my opinion, the United States is in Syria for one reason and it amounts to squatter rights. We already have boots on the ground in Syria. The question becomes how involved does the united States military get in this war?

There has been many hostile acts that betrays Israel's intent regarding Syria. It falls under the Israeli political accusations that Iran is present in Syria that it has justification for carrying out aerial attacks against Syrian military installations and its manufacturing infrastructure. Syria has been deprived of most of its oil production. and Turkey, the United States, and Israel has been illegally selling it on the world market. Despite Bashar Al-Assad being an Alawite Shia Muslim and having unanimous support from its Syrian Christians and Druse populations, and [despite] Assad's steadfast non-aggression foreign policy, the Masonic-Zionist elite have already decided to end the Syrian government and divide up its land.

I believe the script that is being followed is the Israeli 'Oded Yinon' Plan for fomenting a "clash of civilizations" between the Muslims and Christianity. In essence, it is the Masonic-Zionist strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority in the Middle East by keeping it's Arab nations feuding and weak. This is precisely what we have occurring in Syria. You can read more about this Here. This, of course, dovetails into the overall 'Greater Israel' blueprint. Through the Neocons; that is, Israel’s 5th column in the U.S. (which include AIPAC and other Zionist organizations), the U.S. has been pushed into having ‘boots on the ground’ in Syria and Iraq. I wrote about this in more detail on 12-21-22. The article is entitled, "Is the Rothschild 'Greater Israel' Plan Being Realized?". Let's compare the map of the current military occupation of Syria with the map of the'Greater Israel" plan. Here is the map of the military occupation of Syria as of 2022. Note that the gold region just south of the Al-Raqqah area is now under Syrian control. The Kurds moved north of the Euphrates river.

Now, look at the 'Greater Israel" map as seen Here or Here. As you can see, the Euphrates River is border of the 'Greater Israel' (Eretz Israel). This was the Rothschild plan from the very beginning. It is the reason why Israel's flag has to blue stripes on it. One represents the Euphrates and the other the Nile rivers. Throughout the decades in public documents it shows beyond a shadow of a doubt this has always been the plan in the Middle East. As recently as March 03, 2023, Jordan’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Sinan Majali slammed the Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich when he addressed an event in Paris while standing by a map of greater Israel portraying Jordan as part of the self-proclaimed Jewish state.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

From all the other 'fantastic' stories coming out of this purported attack, I simple don't believe any of this. Previously, I stated that even the most ardent of Israel supporters are unaware that Hamas was created and funded by Mossad. Former congressman Ron Paul provided this evidence before Congress several years ago. It should be a well-known fact, but it is throttled and censored instead. Hamas was created to undermine Yassir Arafat's influence over Palestinians. The Hamas co-founder's son turns out to be an Israeli spy. From what we now know, should that be any surprise? The question is how much of a Mossad operation is this purported attack? Always remember that the Masonic-Zionist elites will readily throw as many Jews under-the-bus as necessary to advance their evil plans. Innocent Jews are sacrificed repeatedly for advancing the Masonic-Zionist goal of fulfilling the Rothschild dream for a 'Greater Israel' spanning from the Euphrates to the Nile rivers.

The IDF just blamed Syria for attacking Israel with rockets. This narrative was so predictable and it seem all too timely to blame Syria, especially after Israel has repeatedly attacked Syria and violated Syrian airspace destroying its industrial infrastructure and defense. The Damascus government recognizes that Israel has been attempting to get Syria to respond to their unprovoked attacks. Not once in the past has Syria responded though. The Bashar Al-Assad government is busy trying to reclaim territory that has been taken from them and occupied by the United States, the SDF (Kurds), al Queda, and Turkey. Responding to Israel's attacks would be opening up another warring front for Syria. This would be a very formidable front for Syria to contend with. And a situation that Syria would most definitely want to avoid. It doesn't benefit Syria at all. Why would Syria respond by shooting rockets into Israel now? Who actually benefits from these rocket attacks in Israel. Syria certainly does not benefit. Israel however, does benefit if they can foment war. Let's look at the current demarcation lines and the occupation of Syria.

Here is a recent map of military control in Syria. Not much has changed from this 2021-22 map. The one thing I want to point out is the territory under the control of Bashar Al-Assad's government of Damascus. It extends to the Euphrates River. There is a green area labeled as "Syrian Opposition-held Areas" in the southern region, which is an exception to the overall area that Damascus controls. This green area is really under the control of the United States. We have the Al-Tanf military base there. You can see its exact location here. The United States trains and arms al-Qaeda in this region. If any rocket being fired from Syria into Israel, this would most likely be the location to do this. The question is how much of a role did the United States play in this act of terrorism? Another consideration is the presence of Mossad and IDF actors at Al-Tanf. There is an overall important reason why this American military base is located there. I will explain this in a moment, but first let's go back to the Euphrates river demarcation line that divides the Syrian government controlled area from all the other 'opposition-held' areas located on the "east side" of the Euphrates river. On this "east side" of the Euphrates river Turkey and the US-Israeli proxy Kurds are in control of that region. The Euphrates river as a military demarcation line is very significant and political and military maneuvering repeatedly spells this out. In fact, Turkey has warned the Kurds that crossing the Euphrates was a "red-line" to Turkey. Why? Let's briefly examine Turkey's history to answer this. Turkey has been always hostile to Syria and observes it as part of its Ottoman Syria past. In Ottoman times, Hatay was part of the Vilayet of Aleppo in Ottoman Syria. In 1937, Turkey annexed Syria's province of Hatay. Even the city of Alexandretta (now called İskenderun) was confirmed as Syrian territory in the Treaty of Lausanne agreed upon by Kemal Atatürk but was granted a special autonomous status because it contained a Turkish plurality. Syria bitterly disputed both the separation of Alexandretta and its subsequent annexation to Turkey. The people living anywhere near to Anatolia know the history of Turkish intent for annexing land. All sides including Georgians and Armenians to Greeks to Cypus are always wary of Turkish intentions. It's no different today with the dynamics happening in Syria and Iraq. It's obvious what Ankara's intent is for both northern Syria and Iraq. Many people openly discuss Turkey's imperialism and plans for annexing northern Syria.

You might wonder right now why I am talking about Turkey when Hamas is the kindling for Israel's plan for war. The reason I'm talking about Turkey is this is one of the major players, who will benefit from the fall of the Syrian government. President Erdogan is playing both sides of the Hamas-Israeli conflict. IMHO, Erdogan has a secret deal with Israel over dividing up Syria after the Assad government falls. The planned northern border between Turkey and Israel is at the Euphrates river.

Now, let's examine everything on the west side of the Euphrates river. Why does the United States have a military base on Syrian government territory? Let me answer this by asking another question. Who is allowed to come to the table after a war has been won? It is those countries involved in the war that have already have a stake in the war. It then becomes divvying up the spoils of war. In my opinion, the United States is in Syria for one reason and it amounts to squatter rights. We already have boots on the ground in Syria. The question becomes how involved does the united States military get in this war?

There has been many hostile acts that betrays Israel's intent regarding Syria. It falls under the Israeli political accusations that Iran is present in Syria that it has justification for carrying out aerial attacks against Syrian military installations and its manufacturing infrastructure. Syria has been deprived of most of its oil production. and Turkey, the United States, and Israel has been illegally selling it on the world market. Despite Bashar Al-Assad being an Alawite Shia Muslim and having unanimous support from its Syrian Christians and Druse populations, and [despite] Assad's steadfast non-aggression foreign policy, the Masonic-Zionist elite have already decided to end the Syrian government and divide up its land.

I believe the script that is being followed is the Israeli 'Oded Yinon' Plan for fomenting a "clash of civilizations" between the Muslims and Christianity. In essence, it is the Masonic-Zionist strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority in the Middle East by keeping it's Arab nations feuding and weak. This is precisely what we have occurring in Syria. You can read more about this Here. This, of course, dovetails into the overall 'Greater Israel' blueprint. Through the Neocons; that is, Israel’s 5th column in the U.S. (which include AIPAC and other Zionist organizations), the U.S. has been pushed into having ‘boots on the ground’ in Syria and Iraq. I wrote about this in more detail on 12-21-22. The article is entitled, "Is the Rothschild 'Greater Israel' Plan Being Realized?". Let's compare the map of the current military occupation of Syria with the map of the'Greater Israel" plan. Here is the map of the military occupation of Syria as of 2022. Note that the gold region just south of the Al-Raqqah area is now under Syrian control. The Kurds moved north of the Euphrates river.

Now, look at the 'Greater Israel" map as seen Here or Here. As you can see, the Euphrates River is border of the 'Greater Israel' (Eretz Israel). This was the Rothschild plan from the very beginning. It is the reason why Israel's flag has to blue stripes on it. One represents the Euphrates and the other the Nile rivers. Throughout the decades in public documents it shows beyond a shadow of a doubt this has always been the plan in the Middle East. As recently as March 03, 2023, Jordan’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Sinan Majali slammed the Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich when he addressed an event in Paris while standing by a map of greater Israel portraying Jordan as part of the self-proclaimed Jewish state.

1 year ago
1 score