At one point, Chutkan asked prosecutor Molly Gaston to define which of Trump’s statements about the case would qualify as “disparaging,” and therefore be barred under the gag order. She also asked how such an order could be enforced against a former president.

Chutkan clashed repeatedly with Trump defense lawyer John Lauro, who argued that the effort to limit his client’s out-of-court statements would violate Trump’s First Amendment rights.

Links provide more articles to read

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/wow-laawless-far-left-dc-judge-tanya-chutkan/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/more-lawless-trump-hating-judge-chutkan-is-angry/

At one point, Chutkan asked prosecutor Molly Gaston to define which of Trump’s statements about the case would qualify as “disparaging,” and therefore be barred under the gag order. She also asked how such an order could be enforced against a former president.

Chutkan clashed repeatedly with Trump defense lawyer John Lauro, who argued that the effort to limit his client’s out-of-court statements would violate Trump’s First Amendment rights.

Link provides another article

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/wow-laawless-far-left-dc-judge-tanya-chutkan/