Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.
Edited to add: you never asked me if I had facts as a lawyer. You just asked me if I was one. I said I wasn't, but that I formed my opinions based on facts I got from lawyers. That's not the same as me saying my posts were all "just my opinion".
As I pointed out above, all posts aren't 100% opinion or 100% facts. Just because my posts are largely my opinion doesn't mean my posts or opinions aren't based on facts or don't include facts.
Why are you misrepresenting what we both said here?
Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.
Edited to add: you never asked me if I had facts as a lawyer. You just asked me if I was one. I said I wasn't, but that I formed my opinions based on facts I got from lawyers. That's not the same as me saying my posts were all "just my opinion".
As I pointed out above, all posts aren't 100% opinion or 100% facts. Just because my posts are largely my opinion doesn't mean my posts aren't based on facts or don't include facts.
Why are you misrepresenting what we both said here?
Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.
Edited to add: you never asked me if I had facts as a lawyer. You just asked me if I was one. I said I wasn't, but that I formed my opinions based on facts I got from lawyers. That's not the same as me saying my posts were all "just my opinion".
Why are you misrepresenting what we both said here?
Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.
Edited to add: you never asked me if I had facts as a lawyer. You just asked me if I was one. I said I wasn't, but that I formed my opinions based on facts I got from lawyers. That's not the same as me saying my posts were "just my opinion".
Why are you misrepresenting what we both said here?
Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.
Edited to add: you never asked me if I had facts as a lawyer. You just asked me if I was one. I said I wasn't, but that I got formed my opinions of facts from lawyers. That's not the same as me saying my posts were "just my opinion".
Why are you misrepresenting what we both said here?
Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.
Edited to add: you never asked me if I had facts as a lawyer. You just asked me if I was one. I said I wasn't, but that I got facts I was using in my posts from lawyers. That's not the same as me saying my posts were "just my opinion".
Why are you misrepresenting what we both said here?
Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.
Edited to add: you never asked me if I had facts as a lawyer. You just asked me if I was one. I said I wasn't, but that I got facts I was using in my posts from lawyers. That's not the same as me saying my posts are formed only of my opinion.
Which post are you referring to where I distinguished between opinion and facts?
I've taken facts like the First Amendment having limitations, and what those limitations are from lawyers. But I'm sure I've listed some opinions as well. Everything isn't either/or. All posts aren't 100% facts or 100% opinions.