Whatever works for you, you should use!
Personally, having to plow through the thing of "Who is Q" and "Why isn't he still posting if his intel is so great; why do you think he's still relevant" takes enormous mental energy that is better diverted to sharing the actual intel, the entire reason for Q to be posting in the first place.
It's really hard to make a totally anonymous source sound authoritative and trustworthy to utter neophytes. "It's this guy, no, 10 guys, well, up to 10, and most of them are military, could be NSA but we have no idea really who they are or where, or why they vanished, or what stage of the Plan they're in right now, we just know Trump has never ever disavowed them, so they must be real." Bleagh.
The info is what it's all about IMHO. (Your results may vary :)
The Q proofs you and I think are the most powerful can fly right over the heads of people who weren't there from the outset to digest it slowly, one "byte" at a time.
Imagine trying to explain to a neophyte my favorite undeniable, uncontrovertible, inarguable, undebatable proof: the Triple Delta of 2/17/19. Trump, for some reason, posted to social media under 60 seconds AFTER Q did—three times in one day. The odds against that happening randomly are greater than the number of water molecules in the world's oceans. It would take a large amount of explaining for the significance of it to sink in—if it ever did—and if it did, we still haven't conveyed any actual intel!
After all, Q never once made it about himself. IMHO we shouldn't either.
Whatever works for you, you should use!
Personally, having to plow through the thing of "Who is Q" and "Why isn't he still posting, if his intel is so great, why is he still relevant" takes enormous mental energy that is better diverted to sharing the actual intel, the entire reason for Q to be posting in the first place.
It's really hard to make a totally anonymous source sound authoritative and trustworthy to utter neophytes. "It's this guy, no, 10 guys, well, up to 10, and most of them are military, could be NSA but we have no idea really who they are or where, or why they vanished, or what stage of the Plan they're in right now, we just know Trump has never ever disavowed them, so they must be real." Bleagh.
The info is what it's all about IMHO. (Your results may vary :)
The Q proofs you and I think are the most powerful can fly right over the heads of people who weren't there from the outset to digest it slowly, one "byte" at a time.
Imagine trying to explain to a neophyte my favorite undeniable, uncontrovertible, inarguable, undebatable proof: the Triple Delta of 2/17/19. Trump, for some reason, posted to social media under 60 seconds AFTER Q did—three times in one day. The odds against that happening randomly are greater than the number of water molecules in the world's oceans. It would take a large amount of explaining for the significance of it to sink in—if it ever did—and if it did, we still haven't conveyed any actual intel!
After all, Q never once made it about himself. IMHO we shouldn't either.