Alternative perspective:

McCarthy wokred along with Trump and Gaetz to play out a pantomime that exposes "the establishment, RINO's, Deep State, criminal cabal,", with McCarthy as the bad guy - because the Establishment and Rinos and those behind the Uniparty could buy in to that idea - he has been, after all, the perfect establishment swamp rat - and Gaetz and Maga, etc, as the good guys, getting certain things done - for example, all the committees, the exposure of the Biden Crime family, etc, etc, - McCarthy was supporting these and not blocking them - until the time was right, when then the switch would be made to the full maga speaker that (potentially) Johnson is.

Then, even after he's removed, McCarthy still playing the bad guy, sabotaging everything as a way to heighten the contrast between MAGA and the Swamp, while dragging the Speakership issue out for 3 weeks while the Israel / Hamas event took place (preventing the house from knee-jerk reacting to it), additionally accentuating the situation via the various runs by Jordan, Scalise, etc, until BOOM! M Johnson is brought it.

I personally think that its viable to consider this in two ways: that McCarthy was and is a rat, in which case the effect has been an increased, powerful exposure of the Swamp and the Unitparty, or that McCarthy was a rat but then flipped to work with Trump for this stage of the plan, to have him as speaker, get certain things done, in which case the effect has been an increased, powerful exposure of the Swamp and the Unitparty.

Either way, the effect is the same: exposure. And while everyone loves to hate the bad guy (we feel righteous, justified, and vindicated to some extent), I'm cautious and even suspicious to just walking down that path because of that very reason.

The fact is, none of us know, whether McCarthy was playing a role in cooperation with Trump, or was simply a DS scumbag. And, because we do not (and cannot really know), I think it s prudent and wise to eschew simply equating a belief ("I believe he is / was X") with fact. Beliefs are important, but they are often different from knowledge.

A few things make me suspect that scenario b) McCarthy as playing a role in cooperation with Trump (for whatever reason) is possible:

One, that the speakership rules were set up so that a single vote could trigger vote to ouster - this provides perfect time switch, so that it could be flipped exactly at the desired time

Two, the very effects of the McCarthy / Gaetz contrast (uniparty establishment contrasted with Maga priorities) - this is ideal for waking up the public to the reality of the uniparty

Three, that despite representing the Establishment, a LOT of good things actually happened under McCarthy, specifically the house committees exposing the two-tier justice system, the biden crime family (as the epitome of Swamp corruption), etc. If McCarthy was truly swamp, why did he support these and not hinder them?

Four, the corrupt Fiat Currency system has to implode. I suspect that there is a tangible possibility that all the computer money being sent to Ukraine serves multiple purposes: one, to highlight more than even to the American public how the Establishment Swamp serves their own interests, proxy wars, etc, NOt the American public, two, possibly tracked and used to get evidence etc on all the money laundering lines used by the Cabal, three - it's computer money. It's not real. The money to Ukraine thing is another thing exposing the DS system big time, to even disinterested Americans.

Ultimately, whether its one or the other, the drama of McCarthy (establishment) vs Gaetz (MAGA) serves the greater goals of awakening the public to the reality that DJT has been talking about all these years. As such I don't really care about McCarthy and I avoid getting caught up in all the love/hate emotions that labeling this guy as evil (or what) elicit. That's the province of normies, not anons, imo.

In the end, the net effects are the same, and its NOT good for the DS or the Cabal.

AND, if indeed Johnson as speaker is MASSIVE, as you say, then the whole McCarthy thing will only accentuate the contrast. I guess I'm pretty darn hopeful.

Think about it!

Alternative perspective:

McCarthy wokred along with Trump and Gaetz to play out a pantomime that exposes "the establishment, RINO's, Deep State, criminal cabal,", with McCarthy as the bad guy - because the Establishment and Rinos and those behind the Uniparty could buy in to that idea - he has been, after all, the perfect establishment swamp rat - and Gaetz and Maga, etc, as the good guys, getting certain things done - for example, all the committees, the exposure of the Biden Crime family, etc, etc, - McCarthy was supporting these and not blocking them - until the time was right, when then the switch would be made to the full maga speaker that (potentially) Johnson is.

Then, even after he's removed, McCarthy still playing the bad guy, sabotaging everything as a way to heighten the contrast between MAGA and the Swamp, while dragging the Speakership issue out for 3 weeks while the Israel / Hamas event took place (preventing the house from knee-jerk reacting to it), additionally accentuating the situation via the various runs by Jordan, Scalise, etc, until BOOM! M Johnson is brought it.

I personally think that its viable to consider this in two ways: that McCarthy was and is a rat, in which case the effect has been an increased, powerful exposure of the Swamp and the Unitparty, or that McCarthy was a rat but then flipped to work with Trump for this stage of the plan, to have him as speaker, get certain things done, in which case the effect has been an increased, powerful exposure of the Swamp and the Unitparty.

Either way, the effect is the same: exposure. And while everyone loves to hate the bad guy (we feel righteous, justified, and vindicated to some extent), I'm cautious and even suspicious to just walking down that path because of that very reason.

The fact is, none of us know, whether McCarthy was playing a role in cooperation with Trump, or was simply a DS scumbag. And, because we do not (and cannot really know), I think it s prudent and wise to eschew simply equating a belief ("I believe he is / was X") with fact. Beliefs are important, but they are often different from knowledge.

A few things make me suspect that scenario b) McCarthy as playing a role in cooperation with Trump (for whatever reason) is possible:

One, that the speakership rules were set up so that a single vote could trigger vote to ouster - this provides perfect time switch, so that it could be flipped exactly at the desired time

Two, the very effects of the McCarthy / Gaetz contrast (uniparty establishment contrasted with Maga priorities) - this is ideal for waking up the public to the reality of the uniparty

Three, that despite representing the Establishment, a LOT of good things actually happened under McCarthy, specifically the house committees exposing the two-tier justice system, the biden crime family (as the epitome of Swamp corruption), etc. If McCarthy was truly swamp, why did he support these and not hinder them?

Four, the corrupt Fiat Currency system has to implode. I suspect that there is a tangible possibility that all the computer money being sent to Ukraine serves multiple purposes: one, to highlight more than even to the American public how the Establishment Swamp serves their own interests, proxy wars, etc, NOt the American public, two, possibly tracked and used to get evidence etc on all the money laundering lines used by the Cabal, three - it's computer money. It's not real. The money to Ukraine thing is another thing exposing the DS system big time, to even disinterested Americans.

Ultimately, whether its one or the other, the drama of McCarthy (establishment) vs Gaetz (MAGA) serves the greater goals of awakening the public to the reality that DJT has been talking about all these years. As such I don't really care about McCarthy and I avoid getting caught up in all the love/hate emotions that labeling this guy as evil (or what) elicit. That's the province of normies, not anons, imo.

In the end, the net effects are the same, and its NOT good for the DS or the Cabal.