I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign control of our economy and elections, and actually breaking up monopolies in a clear and consistent manner is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us. As Elon so eloquently put it "ESG is the Devil."

You sound just like a Democrat right now. And Democrats are fascists. You haven't thought through the cause and effect of this policy you're proposing. You're seeing a problem or something you don't think should exist and you're thinking you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here. I hate the propaganda as well, but legally banning depictions of gay characters in film, ads, art, and literature isn't the right solution. The best disinfectant is sunlight and public discourse, not fascism.

I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign control of our economy and elections, and actually breaking up monopolies in a clear and consistent manner is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us. As Elon so eloquently put it "ESG is the Devil."

You sound just like a Democrat right now. You don't think through the cause of things. You see a problem or something you don't think should exist and you think you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here. I hate the propaganda as well, but legally banning depictions of gay characters in film, ads, art, and literature isn't the right solution. The best disinfectant is sunlight and public discourse, not fascism.

I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign control of our economy and elections, and actually tackline monopolies in a clear and consistent manner is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us. As Elon so eloquently put it "ESG is the Devil."

You sound just like a Democrat right now. You don't think through the cause of things. You see a problem or something you don't think should exist and you think you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here. I hate the propaganda as well, but legally banning depictions of gay characters in film, ads, art, and literature isn't the right solution. The best disinfectant is sunlight and public discourse, not fascism.

I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign control of our economy and elections, and actually tackline monopolies in a clear and consistent manner is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us. As Elon so eloquently put it "ESG is the Devil."

You sound just like a Democrat right now. You don't think through the cause of things. You see a problem or something you don't think should exist and you think you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here. I hate the propaganda as well, but legally banning depictions of gay characters in film, ads, and literature isn't the right solution. The best disinfectant is sunlight, not fascism.

I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign control of our economy and elections, and actually tackline monopolies in a clear and consistent manner is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us. As Elon so eloquently put it "ESG is the Devil."

You sound just like a Democrat right now. You don't think through the cause of things. You see a problem or something you don't think should exist and you think you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here. I hate the propaganda as well, but banning depictions of gay characters in film and literature isn't the right solution.

I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign control of our economy and elections, and actually tackline monopolies in a clear and consistent manner is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us. As Elon so eloquently put it "ESG is the Devil."

You sound just like a Democrat right now. You don't think through the cause of things. You see a problem or something you don't think should exist and you think you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here.

I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign control of our economy and elections, and actually tackline monopolies in a clear and consistent manner is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us.

You sound just like a Democrat right now. You don't think through the cause of things. You see a problem or something you don't think should exist and you think you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here.

I'm sorry that you don't understand what a Constitutional right is. You clearly don't adequately appreciate the line you walk when you start banning speech of any kind and the can of worms it would open upon all of us. Banning speech isn't the answer to this problem. Ending foreign involvement in our economy, and actually tackline monopolies is the solution.

Were it not for Blackrock and Vanguard owning more than half of the S&P 500 and all their subsidiaries, the ESG score wouldn't be a thing, and private companies would be free to market to their audiences preferences, rather than engage in propaganda that clearly doesn't appeal to the vast majority of us.

You sound just like a Democrat right now. You don't think through the cause of things. You see a problem or something you don't think should exist and you think you can just attack those things directly and everything will be all better without any unintended consequences, but that's not the case.

If filmmakers want to keep putting gay characters and gay scenes in their movies, and advertisers in their ads, I fully believe they should have the right to do so, and face the grassroots canceling that we've seen in recent years with the likes of Bud Light and others--not face legal repercussions in the land of the free.

The problem is that these companies stand to lose more in their stock price by threats from these corporate monopolies that hold most of their stock than they do from their actual customers--many of whom are either addicted to their products, or are too poor or too stupid to know where else to look to acquire their goods and services.

Sorry, but you're not making yourself part of the solution here.