Came for a dressing down, stayed for a really good discussion about the entities described in section 3, the historical context, whether POTUS qualifies as an officer, whether states might end up with different Presidential ballots based on different conclusions on exclusions, etc.
By my very amateurish and ignorant reading, it'd be a Congressional invocation of the powers of Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 that would give the grounds for a state to remove a candidate for section 3:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C15-1/ALDE_00001077/['insurrection']
EDIT: Here they finally seem to be getting to it!
Came for a dressing down, stayed for a really good discussion about the entities described in section 3, the historical context, whether POTUS qualifies as an officer, whether states might end up with different Presidential ballots based on different conclusions on exclusions, etc.
By my very amateurish and ignorant reading, it'd be a Congressional invocation of the powers of Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 that would give the grounds for a state to remove a candidate for section 3:
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C15-1/ALDE_00001077/['insurrection']