In 2018 Forbes valued Mar a lago at 1/5 of the value of what 45 claimed as the current value.
Account for inflation and 45s property estimates are probably close to spot on. Additionally, in the same Forbes article they mention they probably undershot the estimate given Mar a lago's location and acreage.
Not to burst your bubble fren, but I don't think that property value exposure is going to be anything prophetic. If anything 45 will be vindicated once again in court.
In 2018 Forbes valued Mar a lago at 1/5 of the value of what 45 claimed as the current value.
Account for inflation and 45s property estimates are probably close to spot on. Additionally, in the same Forbes article they mention they probably undershot the estimate given Mar a lago's location and acreage.
Not to burst your bubble fren, but I don't think that property value exposure is going to be anything prophetic.