that of the practitioner as shown in the case studies in the links

First link says:

Our case describes likely secondary syphilis

"Likely" means they DO NOT KNOW.

That is what I expected. What they REALLY have is a rash that they cannot explain, and so they ASSUME syphilis.

It is only an assumption.

It could also be (and I suspect it is) a rash caused by the mystery ingredients in the vaxx, that has nothing at all to do with syphilis, much less sexual contact (for reasons you state).

Second link:

The diversity of the cutaneous manifestations of syphilis and the ability of the spirochete to evade diagnosis have been well documented by medical literature. However, what triggers the onset of secondary syphilis is not yet clear

Once again, they are making claims, but DO NOT KNOW for a fact what they are looking at. Because they do NOT have a specific test that is PROVEN to accurately determine what the illness might be.

I suspect this is NOTHING MORE than vaccine injury, having nothing at all to do with any normal illness.

Syphilis is being used as a SCAPE GOAT for vaccine injury.

It is NOT that the vaccines cause syphilis or any other "natural" illness.

Rather, the ingredients in the vaccine CAUSE DIRECT HARM, which is manifested by this rash.

that of the practitioner as shown in the case studies in the links

First link says:

Our case describes likely secondary syphilis

"Likely" means they DO NOT KNOW.

That is what I expected. What they REALLY have is a rash that they cannot explain, and so they ASSUME syphilis.

It is only an assumption.

It could also be (and I suspect it is) a rash caused by the mystery ingredients in the vaxx, that has nothing at all to do with syphilis, much less sexual contact (for reasons you state).

Second link:

The diversity of the cutaneous manifestations of syphilis and the ability of the spirochete to evade diagnosis have been well documented by medical literature. However, what triggers the onset of secondary syphilis is not yet clear

Once again, they are making claims, but DO NOT KNOW for a fact what they are looking at. Because they do NOT have a specific test that is PROVEN to accurately determine what the illness might be.

I suspect this is NOTHING MORE than vaccine injury, having nothing at all to do with any normal illness.

Syphilis is being used as a SCAPE GOAT for vaccine injury.

It is NOT that the vaccines causes syphilis or any other "natural" illness.

Rather, the ingredients in the vaccine CAUSE DIRECT HARM, which is manifested by this rash.