While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out, and ran his company for him, prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal.

This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. My research suggests many do these abominable acts not because they want to, but because it is the only path to success in a completely controlled world. It is simply, "how the world is." This system of forced compromise has been going on for a very long time. During WWI for example, I think Allister Crowley played the role of "blackmail agent," setting people up for compromise. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein played that role, often being the one to set up, film, and store the evidence of those compromising acts (on his MIT servers). The Lolita Express was his vehicle (literally and figuratively) for those efforts.. It was his "film studio."

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out, and ran his company for him, prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. My research suggests many do these abominable acts not because they want to, but because it is the only path to success in a completely controlled world. It is simply, "how the world is." This system of forced compromise has been going on for a very long time. During WWI for example, I think Allister Crowley played the role of "blackmail agent," setting people up for compromise. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein played that role, often being the one to set up, film, and store the evidence of those compromising acts (on his MIT servers). The Lolita Express was his vehicle (literally and figuratively) for those efforts.. It was his "film studio."

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out, and ran his company for him, prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. My research suggests many do these abominable acts not because they want to, but because it is the only path to success in a completely controlled world. It is simply, "how the world is." This system of forced compromise has been going on for a very long time. During WWI for example, I think Allister Crowley played the role of "blackmail agent," setting people up for compromise. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein played that role, often being the one to set up, film, and store the evidence of those compromising acts (on his MIT servers). The Lolita Express was his vehicle (literally and figuratively) for those efforts..

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out, and ran his company for him, prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. My research suggests many do these abominable acts not because they want to, but because it is the only path to success in a completely controlled world. It is simply, "how the world is." This system of forced compromise has been going on for a very long time. During WWI for example, I think Allister Crowley played the role of "blackmail agent," setting people up for compromise. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was often involved in setting up, filming, and storing the evidence of those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out, and ran his company for him, prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. My research suggests many do these abominable acts not because they want to, but because it is the only path to success in a completely controlled world. It is simply, "how the world is." In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was often involved in setting up, filming, and storing the evidence of those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out, and ran his company for him, prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was often involved in setting up, filming, and storing the evidence of those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was often involved in setting up, filming, and storing the evidence of those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read. That is not to say that isn't a legitimate complaint, but that is all that you can say, and indeed, that is the only counter argument you have provided so far that has merit.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was often involved in setting up, filming, and storing the evidence of those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the repeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was often involved in setting up, filming, and storing the evidence of those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the reapeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was often involved in setting up, filming, and storing the evidence of those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the reapeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to ensure someone's failure unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals, the reapeated patterns and connections, as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have that indicate them as likely "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. The person making The Deal knows full well that they are being filmed for this compromise. They do it because it is the only path to success. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness, "The Deal," inevitably includes being forced to perform certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you, so they can film it and have dirt on you. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness inevitably includes having performed certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, "exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness." Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness inevitably includes having performed certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

You can't demand evidence and then not look at the evidence I provide. It's ludicrous and disingenuous.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness. Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness inevitably includes having performed certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

You can't demand evidence and then not look at the evidence I provide. It's ludicrous and disingenuous.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal have. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness. Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal. This indebtedness inevitably includes having performed certain "less than appropriate" acts that compromise you. In the era in which we are talking, Epstein was usually involved in those compromising acts. And so was the Lolita Express.

Not everyone who is compromised in that manner goes to "The Island." That is only for those that like it. There is evidence that the initial act of compromise however, is handled more simply; often on short jaunts on the Lolita Express.

You can't demand evidence and then not look at the evidence I provide. It's ludicrous and disingenuous.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal have. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness. Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal.

You can't demand evidence and then not look at the evidence I provide. It's ludicrous and disingenuous.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal have. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness. Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to achieve without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidence presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a quid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of coercion and economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal.

You can't demand evidence and then not look at the evidence I provide. It's ludicrous and disingenuous.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.

While I agree wholeheartedly that my argument as presented was somewhat light on "showing the evidence," I did make statements that are easily looked up by yourself to see if they have merit. In several cases I provided links, or told you exactly what to look for that corroborated the statements.

You on the other hand are demanding Absolute Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt That Would Stand Up In Any Court Of Law And Convince Any Jury Of Twelve.

That's not how these things can possibly work. When we investigate anyone, we are looking for connections. We have limited capacity to find information. Most of the investigation into the Cabal is exactly these types of links. The reason they are these types of links is because there is a pattern of behavior in those that we do have better information on. When we see those exact same patterns, and those exact same connections elsewhere, it is completely reasonable to think that perhaps the ultimate conclusions made about the ones we know well, can be at least considered as meaningful evidence about others where we find the exact same behavior.

The list I provided is the easy stuff. You can look for yourself to see if the claims have merit. You refuse, that's OK, but then you can't say anything about whether the claims have merit. You can only complain that I haven't done a book length investigation for you, and published it in a format that you would be willing to read.

However, as for what a "deal with the devil" looks like in the corporate world, I have indeed written a book length investigation and published it in a format that at least some have been willing to read. It's not about Trump, but if you read it, it will show that it is impossible to "screw over the banks," and that quite simply, not one single person on this planet can "make it" as big as Trump has done without being indebted to those who control the entire corporate world.

It is on you to look at my argument for those statements. You can then look for yourself why the list I have provided is indeed evidence of similar behavior by Trump.

they present vague connections and make vague deductions

Think about the venue we are discussing, and what it is you are requiring. We here spend a great deal of time and effort looking for exactly these connections. We do so, because we understand the larger context of events. We have a pretty good idea who the real enemy is, and what signals they have to make them "Cabal agents." Those signals look an awful lot like the list I provided regarding Trump. They look that way because those are important signals in the context of the Cabal. Are they "evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?" Well, not for me, but they are among the exact same signals as those who we believe are Cabal have. You are well aware of that, yet you categorize them as "not important" in this case, and then demand, in a venue where it is impossible to provide sufficient evidence, all the evidence that would convince anyone, even a True Believer.

It's ludicrous. Concede that the evidence is damning, where by "damning" I mean, exactly those signals we are looking for in others to indicate potential Cabal indebtedness. Most important imo is his success in the business world. That is impossible to acheive without being indebted to the PTB. If you read my report, which I offered as evidence several times in my response, you will understand why I suggest it is impossible.

Then perhaps you will see why the people that I called out as being those that bailed Trump out and ran his company for him prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that there is some level of indebtedness there. More, the very act of bailing Trump out would never happen, according to the evidencd presented in my report, unless he had "made a deal with the devil."

They had him by the short hairs. They got him out of it. They would NOT have done that without a qujid pro quo. Period. Perhaps the reason he was in the trouble he was in in the first place was because they had set him up to be, and through no fault of his own. That is entirely possible, as that has happened on numerous occasions (as shown in my report). Contrivances designed to make someone fail unless they make that deal are how the world is controlled. It is a system of coercion and economic manipulation, thus financial coercion, that ensures that everyone who "makes it," makes it through an indebtedness to the Cabal.

You can't demand evidence and then not look at the evidence I provide. It's ludicrous and disingenuous.

presented responses of equal quality, claim they require solid evidence make, and make wild claims about the extent of their knowledge or about "facts" only they seem to be privvy to.

I provided evidence in the form of a direct link to a period report on the topic. I wanted something similar. You are here suggesting that I am asking for more than I provided. No, I was asking for something equivalent.

But of course if you don't actually read the evidence I provide then you can't understand that I have indeed provided it and may then come to the false conclusion you have come to above.