I have presented evidence (overwhelmingly damning, within my report) that in order to "play ball" you must play ball the Cabal way, by signing a deal with the devil.

I have shown you damning evidence that Trump has done exactly that. HOWEVER, without the context of understanding how the system actually works it is not evidence that you can see. It remains completely hidden from view.

Context is king.

That is the answer to your question.

As an aside, I would like to tell you what I think happened.

I think the Trump story goes one of a couple ways, but they all start off the same:

Trump did what he had to do to play ball, just like everyone else who makes it that high. I see no signs that he liked it. I see no signs (or very few) that he repeated his "entry requirements." It seems to me he just did what was necessary. This is where the stories split.

One:

The Q plan has been in motion for decades, and Trump has been a part of it for decades. Just like all "secret agents" Trump did what he had to do to infiltrate the Cabal. Having done my investigation, and having at least some understanding of the scope of the problem (far beyond what most think), you must be an insider to take down the Cabal. In story one, Trump was that insider (or rather, one of them. I think quite a few, and possibly all of the Q team are Cabal insiders).

Two:

Trump was just a regular Cabal guy. Compromised, but not deeply compromised. At least no more than average. He was approached, likely quite a while ago (90s maybe?) by the Q team to take on the Cabal, taking them down from the inside. He agreed.

Three:

Trump is higher up in the Cabal than it appears. There are signs that this might be the case. The whole "Q thing" is the necessary agency of controlled opposition that is set up during every single "social transition" operation.

You would be amazed how many elaborate agencies of controlled opposition there have been in the past. I mean, once you start really looking into these organizations that are "against," it is AMAZING how elaborate the whole scheme is.

For example, the next part of my report elaborates the IWW (International Workers of the World). They were the "anti-Capitalists" of the early 20th century. They were the foundation of all the Unions among many other things. Digging in shows some incredibly elaborate contrivances, false flags, etc. that they were a part of in their "fighting the Capitalists".

The thing is, once you really dig in, all of their leaders have direct ties to Rockefeller (e.g. Margert Sanger was one of the most famous Wobblies). ALL of their leaders were compromised. Looking at the history as presented to the public in the period newspapers, the opposition was clear. There was NO FUCKING WAY, within the rhetoric and actions presented to the public that they were really all working together. Yet with the lens of being able to look at everything all at once, with the internet and internet archives, it becomes completely obvious that they were intentionally created to be the "opposition", so that "both sides" could be controlled for the transition into our "modern world" where the Capitalists of the 19th century, and their monopolies "lost" to "social progress."

As it turns out, the exact same people who were the IWW, who were actually Rockefeller agents, were the same people that created the Soviet Union (at least some of the top level people).

Of course it goes much deeper than that. The point is, there are similarities to today that are a bit frightening. And these types of controlled opposition agencies are all over the place in history. Every single transitional event in history has them, all controlled by the exact people history reports as the "losers" in some social change.

It is not impossible that Q et al are just Cabal in "We The People" clothing. Now, I don't think this is the case, because it appears to me that we are working towards a genuine solution to the problem. BUT, it is not impossible, and once you understand how prevalent it is in history, and how elaborate, and how everyone was fooled, on all sides of the equation (except at the very top)...

Well, it is something worth keeping an eye out for, even if I think it is unlikely given all of the evidence.

I have presented evidence (overwhelmingly damning, within my report) that in order to "play ball" you must play ball the Cabal way, by signing a deal with the devil.

I have shown you damning evidence that Trump has done exactly that. HOWEVER, without the context of understanding how the system actually works it is not evidence that you can see. It remains completely hidden from view.

Context is king.

That is the answer to your question.

As an aside, I would like to tell you what I think happened.

I think the Trump story goes one of a couple ways, but they all start off the same:

Trump did what he had to do to play ball, just like everyone else who makes it that high. I see no signs that he liked it. I see no signs (or very few) that he repeated his "entry requirements." It seems to me he just did what was necessary. This is where the stories split.

One:

The Q plan has been in motion for decades, and Trump has been a part of it for decades. Just like all "secret agents" Trump did what he had to do to become a part of the Cabal. Having done my investigation, and having at least some understanding of the scope of the problem (far beyond what most think), you must be an insider to take down the Cabal. In story one, Trump was that insider (or rather, one of them. I think quite a few, and possibly all of the Q team are Cabal insiders).

Two:

Trump was just a regular Cabal guy. Compromised, but not deeply compromised. At least no more than average. He was approached, likely quite a while ago (90s maybe?) by the Q team to take on the Cabal, taking them down from the inside. He agreed.

Three:

Trump is higher up in the Cabal than it appears. There are signs that this might be the case. The whole "Q thing" is the necessary agency of controlled opposition that is set up during every single "social transition" operation.

You would be amazed how many elaborate agencies of controlled opposition there have been in the past. I mean, once you start really looking into these organizations that are "against," it is AMAZING how elaborate the whole scheme is.

For example, the next part of my report elaborates the IWW (International Workers of the World). They were the "anti-Capitalists" of the early 20th century. They were the foundation of all the Unions among many other things. Digging in shows some incredibly elaborate contrivances, false flags, etc. that they were a part of in their "fighting the Capitalists".

The thing is, once you really dig in, all of their leaders have direct ties to Rockefeller (e.g. Margert Sanger was one of the most famous Wobblies). ALL of their leaders were compromised. Looking at the history as presented to the public in the period newspapers, the opposition was clear. There was NO FUCKING WAY, within the rhetoric and actions presented to the public that they were really all working together. Yet with the lens of being able to look at everything all at once, with the internet and internet archives, it becomes completely obvious that they were intentionally created to be the "opposition", so that "both sides" could be controlled for the transition into our "modern world" where the Capitalists of the 19th century, and their monopolies "lost" to "social progress."

As it turns out, the exact same people who were the IWW, who were actually Rockefeller agents, were the same people that created the Soviet Union (at least some of the top level people).

Of course it goes much deeper than that. The point is, there are similarities to today that are a bit frightening. And these types of controlled opposition agencies are all over the place in history. Every single transitional event in history has them, all controlled by the exact people history reports as the "losers" in some social change.

It is not impossible that Q et al are just Cabal in "We The People" clothing. Now, I don't think this is the case, because it appears to me that we are working towards a genuine solution to the problem. BUT, it is not impossible, and once you understand how prevalent it is in history, and how elaborate, and how everyone was fooled, on all sides of the equation (except at the very top)...

Well, it is something worth keeping an eye out for, even if I think it is unlikely given all of the evidence.

I have presented evidence (within my report) that in order to "play ball" you must play ball the Cabal way, by signing a deal with the devil.

I have shown you damning evidence that Trump has done exactly that. HOWEVER, without the context of understanding how the system actually works it is not evidence that you can see. It remains completely hidden from view.

Context is king.

That is the answer to your question.

As an aside, I would like to tell you what I think happened.

I think the Trump story goes one of a couple ways, but they all start off the same:

Trump did what he had to do to play ball, just like everyone else who makes it that high. I see no signs that he liked it. I see no signs (or very few) that he repeated his "entry requirements." It seems to me he just did what was necessary. This is where the stories split.

One:

The Q plan has been in motion for decades, and Trump has been a part of it for decades. Just like all "secret agents" Trump did what he had to do to become a part of the Cabal. Having done my investigation, and having at least some understanding of the scope of the problem (far beyond what most think), you must be an insider to take down the Cabal. In story one, Trump was that insider (or rather, one of them. I think quite a few, and possibly all of the Q team are Cabal insiders).

Two:

Trump was just a regular Cabal guy. Compromised, but not deeply compromised. At least no more than average. He was approached, likely quite a while ago (90s maybe?) by the Q team to take on the Cabal, taking them down from the inside. He agreed.

Three:

Trump is higher up in the Cabal than it appears. There are signs that this might be the case. The whole "Q thing" is the necessary agency of controlled opposition that is set up during every single "social transition" operation.

You would be amazed how many elaborate agencies of controlled opposition there have been in the past. I mean, once you start really looking into these organizations that are "against," it is AMAZING how elaborate the whole scheme is.

For example, the next part of my report elaborates the IWW (International Workers of the World). They were the "anti-Capitalists" of the early 20th century. They were the foundation of all the Unions among many other things. Digging in shows some incredibly elaborate contrivances, false flags, etc. that they were a part of in their "fighting the Capitalists".

The thing is, once you really dig in, all of their leaders have direct ties to Rockefeller (e.g. Margert Sanger was one of the most famous Wobblies). ALL of their leaders were compromised. Looking at the history as presented to the public in the period newspapers, the opposition was clear. There was NO FUCKING WAY, within the rhetoric and actions presented to the public that they were really all working together. Yet with the lens of being able to look at everything all at once, with the internet and internet archives, it becomes completely obvious that they were intentionally created to be the "opposition", so that "both sides" could be controlled for the transition into our "modern world" where the Capitalists of the 19th century, and their monopolies "lost" to "social progress."

As it turns out, the exact same people who were the IWW, who were actually Rockefeller agents, were the same people that created the Soviet Union (at least some of the top level people).

Of course it goes much deeper than that. The point is, there are similarities to today that are a bit frightening. And these types of controlled opposition agencies are all over the place in history. Every single transitional event in history has them, all controlled by the exact people history reports as the "losers" in some social change.

It is not impossible that Q et al are just Cabal in "We The People" clothing. Now, I don't think this is the case, because it appears to me that we are working towards a genuine solution to the problem. BUT, it is not impossible, and once you understand how prevalent it is in history, and how elaborate, and how everyone was fooled, on all sides of the equation (except at the very top)...

Well, it is something worth keeping an eye out for, even if I think it is unlikely given all of the evidence.

I have presented evidence (within my report) that in order to "play ball" you must play ball the Cabal way, by signing a deal with the devil.

I have shown you damning evidence that Trump has done exactly that. HOWEVER, without the context of understanding how the system actually works it is not evidence that you can see. It remains completely hidden from view.

Context is king.

That is the answer to your question.

As an aside, I would like to tell you what I think happened.

I think the Trump story goes one of a couple ways, but they all start off the same:

Trump did what he had to do to play ball, just like everyone else who makes it that high. I see no signs that he liked it. I see no signs (or very few) that he repeated his "entry requirements." It seems to me he just did what was necessary. This is where the stories split.

One:

The Q plan has been in motion for decades, and Trump has been a part of it for decades. Just like all "secret agents" Trump did what he had to do to become a part of the Cabal. Having done my investigation, and having a at least some understanding of the scope of the problem (far beyond what most think), you must be an insider to take down the Cabal. In story one, Trump was that insider (or rather, one of them. I think quite a few, and possibly all of the Q team are Cabal insiders).

Two:

Trump was just a regular Cabal guy. Compromised, but not deeply compromised. At least no more than average. He was approached, likely quite a while ago (90s maybe?) by the Q team to take on the Cabal, taking them down from the inside. He agreed.

Three:

Trump is higher up in the Cabal than it appears. There are signs that this might be the case. The whole "Q thing" is the necessary agency of controlled opposition that is set up during every single "social transition" operation.

You would be amazed how many elaborate agencies of controlled opposition there have been in the past. I mean, once you start really looking into these organizations that are "against," it is AMAZING how elaborate the whole scheme is.

For example, the next part of my report elaborates the IWW (International Workers of the World). They were the "anti-Capitalists" of the early 20th century. They were the foundation of all the Unions among many other things. Digging in shows some incredibly elaborate contrivances, false flags, etc. that they were a part of in their "fighting the Capitalists".

The thing is, once you really dig in, all of their leaders have direct ties to Rockefeller (e.g. Margert Sanger was one of the most famous Wobblies). ALL of their leaders were compromised. Looking at the history as presented to the public in the period newspapers, the opposition was clear. There was NO FUCKING WAY, within the rhetoric and actions presented to the public that they were really all working together. Yet with the lens of being able to look at everything all at once, with the internet and internet archives, it becomes completely obvious that they were intentionally created to be the "opposition", so that "both sides" could be controlled for the transition into our "modern world" where the Capitalists of the 19th century, and their monopolies "lost" to "social progress."

As it turns out, the exact same people who were the IWW, who were actually Rockefeller agents, were the same people that created the Soviet Union (at least some of the top level people).

Of course it goes much deeper than that. The point is, there are similarities to today that are a bit frightening. And these types of controlled opposition agencies are all over the place in history. Every single transitional event in history has them, all controlled by the exact people history reports as the "losers" in some social change.

It is not impossible that Q et al are just Cabal in "We The People" clothing. Now, I don't think this is the case, because it appears to me that we are working towards a genuine solution to the problem. BUT, it is not impossible, and once you understand how prevalent it is in history, and how elaborate, and how everyone was fooled, on all sides of the equation (except at the very top)...

Well, it is something worth keeping an eye out for, even if I think it is unlikely given all of the evidence.