To be clear, I do not think that OpenAI or AMZN are "embracing Q". Quite the contrary.
I understand that that is your perspective, and it is in line with mainstream GAW thinking.
I surmised that they might be prepping for something that is coming
I would counter by saying that the World would not be in the game state it is in today, if Clowns were able to 'pre-empt' Q's actions.
My perspective differs from mainstream GAW's, in that I have reason to believe so many entities, entities just as big as OpenAI and Amazon, have Flipped. And have done so years ago. Lazy is the anon that says "Once a Clown, Always a Clown". Lazy is the anon that thinks if a few Clowns at the top of an organization/agency are bad, then that entity is 100% bad.
Keeping up with Flips is exhausting. Casually hating OpenAI and Amazon is both more socially accepted in our peer group (GAW users) , and easier.
I have reason to believe that "AI" has been used in Comms to discuss the Programming of the Masses.
In this context, what does it mean for AI to become "self-aware". When Clowns make Terminator (1984), a film about the dangers of future Skynet, could that instead be referring to their fears of the future Internet?
What does it mean for AI, the Programming of the Masses, to equal "Q"?
To be clear, I do not think that OpenAI or AMZN are "embracing Q". Quite the contrary.
I understand that that is your perspective, and it is in line with mainstream GAW thinking.
I surmised that they might be prepping for something that is coming
I would counter by saying that the World would not be in the game state it is in today, if Clowns were able to 'pre-empt' Q's actions.
My perspective differs from mainstream GAW's, in that I have reason to believe so many entities, entities just as big as OpenAI and Amazon, have Flipped. And have done so years ago. Lazy is the anon that says "Once a Clown, Always a Clown". Lazy is the anon that thinks if a few Clowns at the top of an organization/agency are bad, then that entity is 100% bad.
Keeping up with Flips is exhausting. Casually hating OpenAI and Amazon is both more socially accepted in our peer group (GAW users) , and easy.
I have reason to believe that "AI" has been used in Comms to discuss the Programming of the Masses.
In this context, what does it mean for AI to become "self-aware". When Clowns make Terminator (1984), a film about the dangers of future Skynet, could that instead be referring to their fears of the future Internet?
What does it mean for AI, the Programming of the Masses, to equal "Q"?
To be clear, I do not think that OpenAI or AMZN are "embracing Q". Quite the contrary.
I understand that that is your perspective, and it is in line with mainstream GAW thinking.
I surmised that they might be prepping for something that is coming
I would counter by saying that the World would not be in the game state it is in today, if Clowns were able to 'pre-empt' Q's actions.
My perspective differs from mainstream GAW's, in that I have reason to believe so many entities, entities just as big as OpenAI and Amazon, have Flipped. And have done so years ago. Lazy is the anon that says "Once a Clown, Always a Clown". Lazy is the anon that thinks if a few Clowns at the top of an organization/agency are bad, than that entity is 100% bad.
Keeping up with Flips is exhausting. Casually hating OpenAI and Amazon is both more socially accepted in our peer group (GAW users) , and easy.
I have reason to believe that "AI" has been used in Comms to discuss the Programming of the Masses.
In this context, what does it mean for AI to become "self-aware". When Clowns make Terminator (1984), a film about the dangers of future Skynet, could that instead be referring to their fears of the future Internet?
What does it mean for AI, the Programming of the Masses, to equal "Q"?