Great question as always merf! Here’s an attempt to game some of this out:
It was always easily obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
The patriotic “hook” gets conservatives to vote on the reaction. This took until well into the 2010s to undo.
The obvious misstep lost liberals - too many sweetheart contracts for obvious conflicts of interest.
The Afghanistan double-down move divided everyone further, keep those oil dollars going!
Backlash against oil drives push toward EV, which is 15 minute cities and massive loss of power
Everyone is now foaming at everyone. The conservative patriotism hook and Democrat misguided claims and patriotism never being satiated by constructive results keep conservatives from looking into what’s actually going on.
The blatantly obvious corruption keeps democrats from looking into the strategic plays that are going on.
Tons of patriotic individualists dead fighting a war intended to create goods and markets that will destroy them further (see: WWI, WWII, and probably Korea and Vietnam) helps power balance to improve central control with the reverse pendulum swing and anti-national policies while leveraging the anti-privacy and corruption policies that were already put in place under Bush Jr
Nobody knows how to do anything to oppose these people but vote and debate each other, which is rigged and disinfoed, respectively.
51 vs 49 49 vs 51 keep trying to win hearts and minds of that middle!
Saddam WHO is trying to get off the petrodollar?
“Poppy” Bush wants opium for which intelligence agencies? They’re doing what?
Libya is a terrorisms too! No not-dollar for you, Mr “TERRORISMS” Qaddafi! Stop gassing “your own people” who definitely aren’t [our] agents!
Syria is a terrorisms with new and improved terrorisms! (Who was ISIS intended to be pointed at?)
New drugs aimed at those who would fight [us] if we hadn’t broken them or they knew it was [us]
Obama is just so nice and congenital! He triggers my agreeability while also selling my empathy all sorts of stolen valor perks for the downtrodden and disenfranchised. How could anyone hate him he’s so sweet and the media never told me a single bad thing about him. Definitely not the ultimate Judas goat, that Obama. (Bidirectional Judas goat?)
Baghram may have been being set up to attack China or Russia as part of a false flag, or to leverage China to play along with threats of retaliation after they were brought up as the next superpower (pure speculation on my part)
“Nothing unifies like a common enemy”
- Look at [my] right hand while [I] move [my] left
- Fight each other so [I] can swap what [I’m] holding
- Fight about what’s in the right hand so [I] can hock [my] left hand’s wares
- Media narratives are anti-air flak and smokescreens to prevent targeting bombs or sniping
- Divide, divide, divide!!! Create coalitions out of people who hate each other! [We] can rip them in half easier. Enmity within families! Haaaaaate!!! Oh yes you will hate.
My guesses are that it was cover for the actual operations, and that Jr. wasn’t running the main tent. Given the looks at the funeral, he may well have been the flip, too, but this whole thread was strategerical conjecturizations without sauces.
Good guys use kayfabe heels right now, why wouldn’t the baddies have done it? L
Great question as always merf! Here’s an attempt to game some of this out:
It was always easily obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
The patriotic “hook” gets conservatives to vote on the reaction. This took until well into the 2010s to undo.
The obvious misstep lost liberals - too many sweetheart contracts for obvious conflicts of interest.
The Afghanistan double-down move divided everyone further, keep those oil dollars going!
Backlash against oil drives push toward EV, which is 15 minute cities and massive loss of power
Everyone is now foaming at everyone. The conservative patriotism hook and Democrat misguided claims and patriotism never being satiated by constructive results keep conservatives from looking into what’s actually going on.
The blatantly obvious corruption keeps democrats from looking into the strategic plays that are going on.
Tons of patriotic individualists dead fighting a war intended to create goods and markets that will destroy them further (see: WWI, WWII, and probably Korea and Vietnam) helps power balance to improve central control with the reverse pendulum swing and anti-national policies while leveraging the anti-privacy and corruption policies that were already put in place under Bush Jr
Nobody knows how to do anything to oppose these people but vote and debate each other, which is rigged and disinfoed, respectively.
51 vs 49 49 vs 51 keep trying to win hearts and minds of that middle!
Saddam WHO is trying to get off the petrodollar?
“Poppy” Bush wants opium for which intelligence agencies? They’re doing what?
Libya is a terrorisms too! No not-dollar for you, Mr “TERRORISMS” Qaddafi! Stop gassing “your own people” who definitely aren’t [our] agents!
Syria is a terrorisms with new and improved terrorisms! (Who was ISIS intended to be pointed at?)
New drugs aimed at those who would fight [us] if we hadn’t broken them or they knew it was [us]
Obama is just so nice and congenital! He triggers my agreeability while also selling my empathy all sorts of stolen valor perks for the downtrodden and disenfranchised. How could anyone hate him he’s so sweet and the media never told me a single bad thing about him. Definitely not the ultimate Judas goat, that Obama. (Bidirectional Judas goat?)
Baghram may have been being set up to attack China or Russia as part of a false flag, or to leverage China to play along with threats of retaliation after they were brought up as the next superpower (pure speculation on my part)
“Nothing unifies like a common enemy”
- Look at [my] right hand while [I] move [my] left
- Fight each other so [I] can swap what [I’m] holding
- Fight about what’s in the right hand so [I] can hock [my] left hand’s wares
- Media narratives are anti-air flak and smokescreens to prevent targeting bombs or sniping
- Divide, divide, divide!!! Create coalitions out of people who hate each other! [We] can rip them in half easier. Enmity within families! Haaaaaate!!! Oh yes you will hate.
My guesses are that it was cover for the actual operations, and that Jr. wasn’t running the main tent. Given the looks at the funeral, he may well have been the flip, too, but this whole thread was strategerical conjecturizations without sauces.
Good guys use kayfabe heels right now, why wouldn’t the baddies have done it?
Great question as always merf! Here’s an attempt to game some of this out:
It was always easily obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
The patriotic “hook” gets conservatives to vote on the reaction. This took until well into the 2010s to undo.
The obvious misstep lost liberals - too many sweetheart contracts for obvious conflicts of interest.
The Afghanistan double-down move divided everyone further, keep those oil dollars going!
Backlash against oil drives push toward EV, which is 15 minute cities and massive loss of power
Everyone is now foaming at everyone. The conservative patriotism hook and Democrat misguided claims and patriotism never being satiated by constructive results keep conservatives from looking into what’s actually going on.
The blatantly obvious corruption keeps democrats from looking into the strategic plays that are going on.
Tons of patriotic individualists dead fighting a war intended to create goods and markets that will destroy them further (see: WWI, WWII, and probably Korea and Vietnam) helps power balance to improve central control with the reverse pendulum swing and anti-national policies while leveraging the anti-privacy and corruption policies that were already put in place under Bush Jr
Nobody knows how to do anything to oppose these people but vote and debate each other, which is rigged and disinfoed, respectively.
51 vs 49 49 vs 51 keep trying to win hearts and minds of that middle!
Saddam WHO is trying to get off the petrodollar?
“Poppy” Bush wants opium for which intelligence agencies? They’re doing what?
Libya is a terrorisms too! No not-dollar for you, Mr “TERRORISMS” Qaddafi! Stop gassing “your own people” who definitely aren’t [our] agents!
Syria is a terrorisms with new and improved terrorisms! (Who was ISIS intended to be pointed at?)
New drugs aimed at those who would fight [us] if we hadn’t broken them or they knew it was [us]
Baghram may have been being set up to attack China or Russia as part of a false flag, or to leverage China to play along with threats of retaliation after they were brought up as the next superpower (pure speculation on my part)
“Nothing unifies like a common enemy”
- Look at [my] right hand while [I] move [my] left
- Fight each other so [I] can swap what [I’m] holding
- Fight about what’s in the right hand so [I] can hock [my] left hand’s wares
- Media narratives are anti-air flak and smokescreens to prevent targeting bombs or sniping
- Divide, divide, divide!!! Create coalitions out of people who hate each other! [We] can rip them in half easier. Enmity within families! Haaaaaate!!! Oh yes you will hate.
My guesses are that it was cover for the actual operations, and that Jr. wasn’t running the main tent. Given the looks at the funeral, he may well have been the flip, too, but this whole thread was strategerical conjecturizations without sauces.
Good guys use kayfabe heels right now, why wouldn’t the baddies have done it?
Great question as always merf! Here’s an attempt to game some of this out:
It was always easily obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
The patriotic “hook” gets conservatives to vote on the reaction. This took until well into the 2010s to undo.
The obvious misstep lost liberals - too many sweetheart contracts for obvious conflicts of interest.
The Afghanistan double-down move divided everyone further, keep those oil dollars going!
Backlash against oil drives push toward EV, which is 15 minute cities and massive loss of power
Everyone is now foaming at everyone. The conservative patriotism hook and Democrat misguided claims and patriotism never being satiated by constructive results keep conservatives from looking into what’s actually going on.
The blatantly obvious corruption keeps democrats from looking into the strategic plays that are going on.
Tons of patriotic individualists dead fighting a war intended to create goods and markets that will destroy them further (see: WWI, WWII, and probably Korea and Vietnam) helps power balance to improve central control with the reverse pendulum swing and anti-national policies while leveraging the anti-privacy and corruption policies that were already put in place under Bush Jr
Nobody knows how to do anything to oppose these people but vote and debate each other, which is rigged and disinfoed, respectively.
51 vs 49 49 vs 51 keep trying to win hearts and minds of that middle!
Saddam WHO is trying to get off the petrodollar?
“Poppy” Bush wants opium for which intelligence agencies? They’re doing what?
Libya is a terrorisms too! No not-dollar for you, Mr “TERRORISMS” Qaddafi! Stop gassing “your own people” who definitely aren’t [our] agents!
Syria is a terrorisms with new and improved terrorisms! (Who was ISIS intended to be pointed at?)
New drugs aimed at those who would fight [us] if we hadn’t broken them or they knew it was [us]
Baghram may have been being set up to attack China or Russia as part of a false flag, or to leverage China to play along with threats of retaliation after they were brought up as the next superpower (pure speculation on my part)
“Nothing unifies like a common enemy”
- Look at [my] right hand while [I] move [my] left
- Fight each other so [I] can swap what [I’m] holding
- Fight about what’s in the right hand so [I] can hock [my] left hand’s wares
- Media narratives are anti-air flak and smokescreens to prevent targeting bombs or sniping
- Divide, divide, divide!!! Create coalitions out of people who hate each other! [We] can rip them in half easier. Enmity within families! Haaaaaate!!! Oh yes you will hate.
My guesses are that it was cover for the actual operations, and that Jr. wasn’t running the main tent. Given the looks at the funeral, he may well have been the flip, too, but this whole thread was strategerical conjecturizations without sauces.
Great question as always merf! Here’s an attempt to game some of this out:
It was always easily obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
The patriotic “hook” gets conservatives to vote on the reaction. This took until well into the 2010s to undo.
The obvious misstep lost liberals - too many sweetheart contracts for obvious conflicts of interest.
The Afghanistan double-down move divided everyone further, keep those oil dollars going!
Backlash against oil drives push toward EV, which is 15 minute cities and massive loss of power
Everyone is now foaming at everyone. The conservative patriotism hook and Democrat misguided claims and patriotism never being satiated by constructive results keep conservatives from looking into what’s actually going on.
The blatantly obvious corruption keeps democrats from looking into the strategic plays that are going on.
Tons of patriotic individualists dead fighting a war intended to create goods and markets that will destroy them further (see: WWI, WWII, and probably Korea and Vietnam) helps power balance to improve central control with the reverse pendulum swing and anti-national policies while leveraging the anti-privacy and corruption policies that were already put in place under Bush Jr
Nobody knows how to do anything to oppose these people but vote and debate each other, which is rigged and disinfoed, respectively.
51 vs 49 49 vs 51 keep trying to win hearts and minds of that middle!
Saddam WHO is trying to get off the petrodollar?
“Poppy” Bush wants opium for which intelligence agencies? They’re doing what?
Libya is a terrorisms too! No not-dollar for you, Mr “TERRORISMS” Qaddafi! Stop gassing “your own people” who definitely aren’t [our] agents!
Syria is a terrorisms with new and improved terrorisms! (Who was ISIS intended to be pointed at?)
New drugs aimed at those who would fight [us] if we hadn’t broken them or they knew it was [us]
Baghram may have been being set up to attack China or Russia as part of a false flag, or to leverage China to play along with threats of retaliation after they were brought up as the next superpower (pure speculation on my part)
“Nothing unifies like a common enemy”
- Look at [my] right hand while [I] move [my] left
- Fight each other so [I] can swap what [I’m] holding
- Fight about what’s in the right hand so [I] can hock [my] left hand’s wares
- Media narratives are anti-air flak and smokescreens to prevent targeting bombs or sniping
- Divide, divide, divide!!! Create coalitions out of people who hate each other! [We] can rip them in half easier. Enmity within families! Haaaaaate!!! Oh yes you will hate.
Great question as always merf! Here’s an attempt to game some of this out:
It was always easily obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
The patriotic “hook” gets conservatives to vote on the reaction. This took until well into the 2010s to undo.
The obvious misstep lost liberals - too many sweetheart contracts for obvious conflicts of interest.
The Afghanistan double-down move divided everyone further, keep those oil dollars going!
Backlash against oil drives push toward EV, which is 15 minute cities and massive loss of power
Everyone is now foaming at everyone. The conservative patriotism hook and Democrat misguided claims and patriotism never being satiated by constructive results keep conservatives from looking into what’s actually going on.
The blatantly obvious corruption keeps democrats from looking into the strategic plays that are going on.
Tons of patriotic individualists dead fighting a war intended to create goods and markets that will destroy them further (see: WWI, WWII, and probably Korea and Vietnam) helps power balance to improve central control with the reverse pendulum swing and anti-national policies while leveraging the anti-privacy and corruption policies that were already put in place under Bush Jr
Nobody knows how to do anything to oppose these people but vote and debate each other, which is rigged and disinfoed, respectively.
51 vs 49 49 vs 51 keep trying to win hearts and minds of that middle!
Saddam WHO is trying to get off the petrodollar?
“Poppy” Bush wants opium for which intelligence agencies? They’re doing what?
Libya is a terrorisms too! No not-dollar for you, Mr “TERRORISMS” Qaddafi! Stop gassing “your own people” who definitely aren’t [our] agents!
Syria is a terrorisms with new and improved terrorisms! (Who was ISIS intended to be pointed at?)
New drugs aimed at those who would fight [us] if we hadn’t broken them or they knew it was [us]
Baghram may have been being set up to attack China or Russia as part of a false flag, or to leverage China to play along with threats of retaliation after they were brought up as the next superpower (pure speculation on my part)
“Nothing unifies like a common enemy”
- Look at [my] right hand while [I] move [my] left
- Fight each other so [I] can swap what [I’m] holding
- Fight about what’s in the right hand so [I] can hock [my] left hand’s wares
- Media narratives are anti-air flak and smokescreens to prevent targeting bombs or sniping
- Divide, divide, divide!!! Create coalitions out of people who hate each other! Enmity within families! Hate!!! Oh yes you will hate.
Great question as always merf! Here’s an attempt to game some of this out:
It was always easily obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
The patriotic “hook” gets conservatives to vote on the reaction. This took until well into the 2010s to undo.
The obvious misstep lost liberals - too many sweetheart contracts for obvious conflicts of interest.
The Afghanistan double-down move divided everyone further, keep those oil dollars going!
Backlash against oil drives push toward EV, which is 15 minute cities and massive loss of power
Everyone is now foaming at everyone.
The conservative patriotism hook and Democrat misguided claims keep conservatives from looking into what’s actually going on.
The blatantly obvious corruption keeps democrats from looking into the strategic plays that are going on.
Tons of patriotic individualists dead fighting a war intended to create goods and markets that will destroy them further (see: WWI, WWII, and probably Korea and Vietnam) helps power balance to improve central control with the reverse pendulum swing and anti-national policies while leveraging the anti-privacy and corruption policies that were already put in place under Bush Jr
Nobody knows how to do anything to oppose these people but vote and debate each other, which is rigged and disinfoed, respectively.
51 vs 49 49 vs 51 keep trying to win hearts and minds of that middle!
Saddam WHO is trying to get off the petrodollar?
“Poppy” Bush wants opium for which intelligence agencies? They’re doing what?
Libya is a terrorisms too! No not-dollar for you, Mr “TERRORISMS” Qaddafi! Stop gassing “your own people” who definitely aren’t [our] agents!
New drugs aimed at those who would fight [us] if we hadn’t broken them or they knew it was [us]
Baghram may have been being set up to attack China or Russia as part of a false flag, or to leverage China to play along with threats of retaliation after they were brought up as the next superpower (pure speculation on my part)
“Nothing unifies like a common enemy”
- Look at [my] right hand while [I] move [my] left
- Fight each other so [I] can swap what [I’m] holding
- Fight about what’s in the right hand so [I] can hock [my] left hand’s wares
- Media narratives are anti-air flak and smokescreens to prevent targeting bombs or sniping
- Divide, divide, divide!!! Create coalitions out of people who hate each other! Enmity within families! Hate!!! Oh yes you will hate.