It's funny how people who claim to be devout don't actually read their Bible or the extra literature cited within and recommended in the Bible.

Even irl, I can pull out any Bible on any shelf and open it to passages like 2 Samuel 1:18 and directly show them with their own book in their house from their own bookshelf, any translation, that there is more to the story than what is included in the man-regulated composition of holy texts called the Bible which was composed under the directions of the council of Nicea in 325 AD and the first coucil of Constantinople in 381 AD and published as an anthology by st Jerome in 400 AD.

It's annoying, the cognitive dissonance required to call the text holy and then argue with it is baffling. People don't even know the history of the composition of the anthology of texts called the Bible. Even church elders are surprised when I talk about the documented assembly of the anthology, it's like they think the Bible fell from heaven as the king James version lol.

The conversation usually goes:

Me: "Hey look, the Bible reference the book of Jasher 3 times, check out these Bible passages"

Then: "Oh wow, it does reference Jasher on 3 seperate occasions and it does suggest you read it"

Me: "I have a copy if you're interested"

Them: "No, you shouldn't read it either because it's not already included in the Bible so it must not be important"

Okay lol, blind leading the blind

It's funny how people who claim to be devout don't actually read their Bible or the extra literature cited within and recommended in the Bible.

Even irl, I can pull out any Bible on any shelf and open it to passages like 2 Samuel 1:18 and directly show them with their own book in their house from their own bookshelf, any translation, that there is more to the story than what is included in the man-regulated composition of holy texts called the Bible which was composed under the directions of the council of Nicea in 325 AD and the first coucil of Constantinople in 381 AD and published as an anthology by st Jerome in 400 AD.

It's annoying, the cognitive dissonance required to call the text holy and then argue with it is baffling. People don't even know the history of the composition of the anthology of texts called the Bible. Even church elders are surprised when I talk about the documented assembly of the anthology, it's like they think the Bible fell from heaven as the king James version lol.

The conversation usually goes:

Me: "Hey look, the Bible reference the book of Jasher 3 times, check out these Bible passages"

Then: "Oh wow, it does reference Jasher on 3 seperate occasions and it does suggest you read it"

Me: "I have a copy if you're interested"

Them: "No, you shouldn't read it either because it's not already included in the Bible so it must not be important"

Okay lol

It's funny how people who claim to be devout don't actually read their Bible or the extra literature cited within and recommended in the Bible.

Even irl, I can pull out any Bible on any shelf and open it to passages like 2 Samuel 1:18 and directly show them with their own book in their house from their own bookshelf, any translation, that there is more to the story than what is included in the man-regulated composition of holy texts called the Bible which was composed under the directions of the council of Nicea in 325 AD and the first coucil of Constantinople in 381 AD and published as an anthology by st Jerome in 400 AD.

It's annoying, the cognitive dissonance required to call the text holy and then argue with it is baffling. People don't even know the history of the composition of the anthology of texts called the Bible. Even church elders are surprised when I talk about the documented assembly of the anthology, it's like they think the Bible fell from heaven as the king James version lol.

The conversation usually goes:

Me: "Hey look, the Bible reference the book of Jasher 3 times, check out these Bible passages"

Then: "Oh wow, it does reference Jasher on 3 seperate occasions and it does suggest you read it"

Me: "I have a copy if your interested"

Them: "No, you shouldn't read it either because it's not already included in the Bible so it must not be important"

Okay lol