I knew from day one of seeing and hearing Qanon like it was the same as Q, that sooner or later it would all mush together so much that regular people would accept the two as the same. Why wouldn't the difference between someone who is an anon who follows Q, and someone being a "Qanon", not completely confuse? Of course it does. It doesn't solve anything to say "no such thing as Qanon" there IS a Qanon whether we like it or not. So how do we boomerang it and make it work FOR us? Get them at their own game. Anons should completely infiltrate and restate the messages.

I knew from day one of seeing and hearing Qanon like it was the same as Q, that sooner or later it would all mush together so much that regular people would accept the two as the same. Why wouldn't the difference between someone who is a Q anon, and someone being a "Qanon", not completely confuse? Of course it does. It doesn't solve anything to say "no such thing as Qanon" there IS a Qanon whether we like it or not. So how do we boomerang it and make it work FOR us? Get them at their own game. Anons should completely infiltrate and restate the messages.

I knew from day one of seeing and hearing Qanon like it was the same as Q, that sooner or later it would all mush together so much that regular people would accept the two as the same. Why wouldn't the difference between someone who is a Q anon, and someone being a "Qanon", not completely confuse? Of course it does. It doesn't solve anything to say "no such thing as Qanon" there IS a Qanon whether we like it or not. So how do we boomerang it and make it work FOR us? Get them at their own game.

I knew from day one of seeing and hearing Qanon like it was the same as Q, that sooner or later it would all mush together so much that regular people would accept the two as the same. It doesn't solve anything to say "no such thing as Qanon" there IS a Qanon whether we like it or not. So how do we boomerang it and make it work FOR us? Get them at their own game.