fair. so far the best ive done is namedrop a few historians whose work can take you back that far. putting together summaries that ties their work together with sauce would be a project i might be doing if i weren't homeless. unfortunately the sources are well recieved by like 8% of his community at best.
also i've done a lot of listening to interviews and all kinds of different recording sessions where a lot of this information lies. i have been waiting for a long time for a workstation where i can put some info together.
I guess USB-C takes away a lot of excuses since everywhere is a workstation. but you know. lots on my plate. plus i'm retarded.
anyways. michael tsarion has a cool body of work. i am sure not all of his conclusions are correct, but he is extremely well sourced. and many of the conclusions are correct.
Lyssa Royal is a weirder source with a much wider scope. not very well sourced, but it lines up with and explains some things that that tsarions work cannot. i trust her conclusions much more.
all the other sources with this info are weird and unsourced as well. ....but the information lines up. i know there are a few pedes that are familiar with the 'ra material'. megan rose certainly seems to have an interesting part of the story.
its all there. seek and ye shall find
yeah my drunk ass is leaving this wall of text here so what haha don banh mi
fair. so far the best ive done is namedrop a few historians whose work can take you back that far. putting together summaries that ties their work together with sauce would be a project i might be doing if i weren't homeless. unfortunately the sources are well recieved by like 8% of his community at best.
also i've done a lot of listening to interviews and all kinds of different recording sessions where a lot of this information lies. i have been waiting for a long time for a workstation where i can put some info together.
I guess USB-C takes away a lot of excuses since everywhere is a workstation. but you know. lots on my plate. plus i'm retarded.
anyways. michael tsarion has a cool body of work. i am sure not all of his conclusions are correct, but he is extremely well sourced. and many of the conclusions are correct.
Lyssa Royal is a weirder source with a much wider scope. not very well sourced, but it lines up with and explains some things that that tsarions work cannot. i trust her conclusions much more.
all the other sources with this info are weird and unsourced as well. ....but the information lines up. i know there are a few pedes that are familiar with the 'ra material'. megan rose certainly seems to have an interesting part of the story.
its all there. seek and ye shall find
fair. so far the best ive done is namedrop a few historians whose work can take you back that far. putting together summaries that ties their work together with sauce would be a project i might be doing if i weren't homeless. unfortunately the sources are well recieved by like 8% of his community at best.
also i've done a lot of listening to interviews and all kinds of different recording sessions where a lot of this information lies. i have been waiting for a long time for a workstation where i can put some info together.
I guess USB-C takes away a lot of excuses since everywhere is a workstation. but you know. lots on my plate. plus i'm retarded.