Around twenty years ago, Alex Jones was one of the few famous people chanting “9/11 was an inside job!” Maybe he was trying to put the heat on American intelligence agencies rather than Israeli ones, but that would be a strange way to do it. At the time, any departure from the false official narrative, that it was a 100% outside job done by muslims, was a valuable redpilling of perhaps millions of people which would ultimately lead them to suspecting Mossad, because the truth is that Mossad is ultimately partially responsible for 9/11. The amount of heat that Jones indirectly put on Mossad makes me believe that he’s not in cahoots with them.

There’s a chance this belief is wrong, and Mossad figured that the strange jewish behaviors surrounding 9/11 would give them away eventually anyway. These jewish antics include the series of wars against Israel’s enemies, kickstarted by an attack on America, that were prescribed in the essay by the Project for the New American Century (neocon think tank of Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan). Other telltale jewish antics were done by Larry Silverstein taking control of the seemingly unprofitable World Trade Center and then over-insuring it, and his command regarding Building 7, “Pull it.” There’s also the Bolshevikesque expansion of the US deep state, police state, and surveillance state, which undermined and oppressed American gentiles. This included the creation of DHS and its TSA, and the Patriot Act and other legislation attacking the rights of American gentiles. The wars themselves were detrimental to American military personnel, which includes a lower percentage of jews than in the general population, and the war in Afghanistan subjectively benefited the jewish opiate dealing family, the Sacklers. And of course, the videos of dancing Israelis celebrating the 9/11 attacks raised some eyebrows. So maybe the jews figured they’d eventually get the blame they deserve, so they got their controlled opposition Alex Jones in front of the issue. I doubt it, though, because it seems like a low percentage tactic.

Around twenty years ago, Alex Jones was one of the few famous people chanting “9/11 was an inside job!” Maybe he was trying to put the heat on American intelligence agencies rather than Israeli ones, but that would be a strange way to do it. At the time, any departure from the false official narrative, that it was a 100% outside job done by muslims, was a valuable redpilling of perhaps millions of people which would ultimately lead them to suspecting Mossad, because the truth is that Mossad is ultimately partially responsible for 9/11. The amount of heat that Jones indirectly put on Mossad makes me believe that he’s not in cahoots with them.

There’s a chance this belief is wrong, and Mossad figured that the strange jewish behaviors surrounding 9/11 would give them away eventually anyway. These jewish antics include the series of wars against Israel’s enemies, kickstarted by an attack on America, that were prescribed in the essay by the Project for the New American Century (neocon think tank of Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan), Other telltale jewish antics were done by Larry Silverstein taking control of the seemingly unprofitable World Trade Center and then over-insuring it, and his command regarding Building 7, “Pull it.” There’s also the Bolshevikesque expansion of the US deep state, police state, and surveillance state, which undermined and oppressed American gentiles. This included the creation of DHS and its TSA, and the Patriot Act and other legislation attacking the rights of American gentiles. The wars themselves were detrimental to American military personnel, which includes a lower percentage of jews than in the general population, and the war in Afghanistan subjectively benefited the jewish opiate dealing family, the Sacklers. And of course, the videos of dancing Israelis celebrating the 9/11 attacks raised some eyebrows. So maybe the jews figured they’d eventually get the blame they deserve, so they got their controlled opposition Alex Jones in front of the issue. I doubt it, though, because it seems like a low percentage tactic.