Oh I’m familiar with those points. Doesn’t mean I don’t want the data. The “told you so” capability in it would be fantastic and hilarious, however ineffective.
For one thing, most slave owners treated their slaves well.
Go read up on “Song of the South”.
Modern hand wringers find it offensive because it depicted the slaves as being “unrealistically happy”, and “therefore offensive”.
It is to lul.
“You imbeciles. We are slaves NOW. Are you ever happy or are you always miserable?”
“Hurr durr but we are talking about chattel style slavery.”
“‘Chattel’ and ‘cattle’ derive from the same word. So does ‘vac(a)-cinate’, which literally means ‘pertaining to cattle’.”
“You’re reading too much into words.”
“No, you’re too blind to see truth.”
As much as I really want to deal with people in love, their stupidity and insistence on remaining blind really pisses me off.
Serious respect to anyone who’s been awake since the 70’s. I don’t know how you’ve put up with this sort of thing for so long.
Oh I’m familiar with those points. Doesn’t mean I don’t want the data. The “told you so” capability in it would be fantastic and hilarious, however ineffective.
For one thing, most slave owners treated their slaves well.
Go read up on “Song of the South”.
Modern hand wringers find it offensive because it depicted the slaves as being “unrealistically happy”, and “therefore offensive”.
It is to lul.
“You imbeciles. We are slaves NOW. Are you ever happy or are you always miserable?”
“Hurr durr but we are talking about chattel style slavery.”
“‘Chattel’ and ‘cattle’ derive from the same word. So does ‘vac(a)-cinate’, which literally means ‘pertaining to cattle’.”
“You’re reading too much into words.”
“No, you’re too blind to see truth.”
As much as I really want to deal with people in love, their stupidity and insistence on remaining blind really pisses me off.
Oh I’m familiar with those points. Doesn’t mean I don’t want the data. The “told you so” capability in it would be fantastic and hilarious, however ineffective.
For one thing, most slave owners treated their slaves well.
Go read up on “Song of the South”.
Modern hand wringers find it offensive because it depicted the slaves as being “unrealistically happy”, and “therefore offensive”.
It is to lul.
“You imbeciles. We are slaves NOW. Are you ever happy or are you always miserable?”
“Hurr durr but we are talking about chattel style slavery.”
“‘Chattel’ and ‘cattle’ derive from the same word. So does ‘vac(a)-cinate’, which literally means ‘pertaining to cattle’.”
“You’re reading too much into words.”
“No, you’re too blind to see truth.”
Oh I’m familiar with those points. Doesn’t mean I don’t want the data. The “told you so” capability in it would be fantastic and hilarious, however ineffective.
For one thing, most slave owners treated their slaves well.
Go read up on “Song of the South”.
Modern hand wringers find it offensive because it depicted the slaves as being “unrealistically happy”, and “therefore offensive”.
It is to lul.
“You imbeciles. We are slaves NOW. Are you ever happy or are you always miserable?”