Good stuff but a little disappointing; I was anticipating side-by-side comparison photos that show the glaring differences in the facial features of the actor and the real Senator Biden. Normies—and even many anons—are still naively proceeding under the illusion that the guy they see on the teevee is Joseph R. Biden.

Biggest tell for me is the teeth. I've said this before, and it's never even been rationally challenged. NOBODY on earth has their large, perfect, ultra bright white choppers (think VP debate) ripped out of their face and replaced with teeth of normal size and color.

That simply doesn't happen—any more than an adult radically changing their signature in their 70s, the way this guy purportedly has.

::werdnerd mode:: "Biden" has two ways of forming his capital B: starting high and making a downward stroke, then lifting the pen and drawing a "3" right next to it; or beginning at the baseline and making a stroke upward, then continuing the B without lifting the pen. They are, and look, MARKEDLY DIFFERENT—so different a prepubescent child could tell them apart (just keep her away from you know whom).

Why do we see Joe Biden's signature with both variations, one way before the stolen election, and the other way afterward?

Good stuff but a little disappointing; I was anticipating side-by-side comparison photos that show the glaring differences in the facial features of the actor and the real Senator Biden. Normies—and even many anons—are still naively proceeding under the illusion that the guy they see on the teevee is Joseph R. Biden.

Biggest tell for me is the teeth. I've said this before, and it's never even been rationally challenged. NOBODY on earth has their large, perfect, ultra bright white choppers (think VP debate) ripped out of their face and replaced with teeth of normal size and color.

That simply doesn't happen—any more than an adult radically changing their signature in their 70s, the way this guy purportedly has.

::werdnerd mode:: "Biden" has two ways of forming his capital B: starting high and making a downward stroke, then lifting the pen and drawing a "3" right next to it; or beginning at the baseline and making a stroke upward, then continuing the B without lifting the pen. They are, and look, MARKEDLY DIFFERENT—so different a prepubescent child could tell them apart (just keep her away from you know whom).

Why do we see Joe Biden's signature with both variations, one way before the stolen election, and the other way afterward? Someone needs to offer a plausible explanation for "this guy's" signature changing that radically. That has not occurred.

Good stuff but a little disappointing; I was anticipating side-by-side comparison photos that show the glaring differences in the facial features of the actor and the real Senator Biden. Normies—and even many anons—are still naively proceeding under the illusion that the guy they see on the teevee is Joseph R. Biden.

Biggest tell for me is the teeth. I've said this before, and it's never even been rationally challenged. NOBODY on earth has their large, perfect, ultra bright white choppers (think VP debate) ripped out of their face and replaced with teeth of normal size and color.

That simply doesn't happen—any more than an adult radically changing their signature in their 70s, the way this guy purportedly has.

::werdnerd mode:: "Biden" has two ways of forming his capital B: starting high and making a downward stroke, then lifting the pen and drawing a "3" right next to it; or beginning at the baseline and making a stroke upward, then continuing the B without lifting the pen. They are, and look, MARKEDLY DIFFERENT—so different a prepubescent child could tell the difference (just keep her away from you know whom).

Why do we see Joe Biden's signature with both variations, one way before the stolen election, and the other way afterward? Someone needs to offer a plausible explanation for "this guy's" signature changing that radically. That has not occurred.

Good stuff but a little disappointing; I was anticipating side-by-side comparison photos that show the glaring differences in the facial features of the actor and the real Senator Biden. Normies—and even many anons—are still naively proceeding under the illusion that the guy they see on the teevee is Joseph R. Biden.

Biggest tell for me is the teeth. I've said this before, and it's never even been rationally challenged. NOBODY on earth has their large, perfect, ultra bright white choppers (think VP debate) ripped out of their face and replaced with teeth of normal size and color.

That simply doesn't happen—any more than an adult radically changing their signature in their 70s, the way this guy purportedly has.

::werdnerd mode:: "Biden" has two ways of forming his capital B: starting high and making a downward stroke, then lifting the pen and drawing a "3" right next to it; or beginning at the baseline and making a stroke upward, then continuing the B without lifting the pen. They look MARKEDLY DIFFERENT—so different a prepubescent child could tell the difference (just keep her away from you know whom).

Why do we see Joe Biden's signature with both variations, one way before the stolen election, and the other way afterward? Someone needs to offer a plausible explanation for "this guy's" signature changing that radically. That has not occurred.

Good stuff but a little disappointing; I was anticipating side-by-side comparison photos that show the glaring differences in the facial features of the actor and the real Senator Biden. Normies—and even many anons—are still naively proceeding under the illusion that the guy they see on the teevee is Joseph R. Biden.

Biggest tell for me is the teeth. I've said this before, and it's never even been rationally challenged. NOBODY on earth has their large, perfect, ultra bright white choppers (think VP debate) ripped out of their face and replaced with teeth of normal size and color.

That simply doesn't happen—any more than an adult radically changing their signature in their 70s, the way this guy purportedly has.

::werdnerd mode:: "Biden" has two ways of forming his capital B: starting high and making a downward stroke, then lifting the pen and drawing a "3" right next to it; and beginning at the baseline and making a stroke upward, then continuing the B without lifting the pen. They look MARKEDLY DIFFERENT—so different a prepubescent child could tell the difference (just keep her away from you know whom).

Why do we see Joe Biden's signature with both variations, one way before the stolen election, and the other way afterward? Someone needs to offer a plausible explanation for "this guy's" signature changing that radically. That has not occurred.

Good stuff but a little disappointing; I was anticipating side-by-side comparison photos that show the glaring differences in the facial features of the actor and the real Senator Biden. Normies—and even many anons—are still naively proceeding under the illusion that the guy they see on the teevee is Joseph R. Biden.

Biggest tell for me is the teeth. I've said this before, and it's never even been rationally challenged. NOBODY on earth has their large, perfect, ultra bright white choppers (think VP debate) ripped out of their face and replaced with teeth of normal size and color.

That simply doesn't happen—any more than an adult radically changing their signature in their 70s, the way this guy purportedly has.

::werdnerd mode:: When you form a capital B, you either: start high and make a downward stroke, then lift the pen and draw a "3" right next to it; or you begin at the baseline and make stroke upward, then continue drawing the B without lifting the pen. They look MARKEDLY DIFFERENT—so different a prepubescent child could tell the difference (just keep her away from you know whom).

Why do we see Joe Biden's signature with both variations, one way before the stolen election, and the other way afterward? Someone needs to offer a plausible explanation for "this guy's" signature changing that radically. That has not occurred.