No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the unconstitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

[EDIT TO ADD: Also, there is nothing in federal statutes about wearing face masks. The CDC just made that up -- they never had any lawful authority to require that. And even the quarantines are ONLY for animals and plants when crossing into the USA from another country. There is NO statute that grants the federal government the autority to quarantine PEOPLE as some sort of precaution. It was ALL UNLAWFUL.]

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyranny -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic "because it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect the transmission of data -- by electronic means -- which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

HIPAA was passed in 1996, before the internet was in real use, and it actually was about transmitting patient data to health insurance companies via fax machine.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

The mission of the CIA will be complete when everything the American people believes is false.

-- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan

I used to be baffled about why he would say that.

Now ... I understand.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the unconstitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

[EDIT TO ADD: Also, there is nothing in federal statutes about wearing face masks. The CDC just made that up -- they never had any lawful authority to require that. And even the quarantines are ONLY for animals and plants when crossing into the USA from another country. There is NO statute that grants the federal government the autority to quarantine PEOPLE as some sort of precaution. It was ALL UNLAWFUL.]

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyranny -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic "because it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect the transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

The mission of the CIA will be complete when everything the American people believes is false.

-- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan

I used to be baffled about why he would say that.

Now ... I understand.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the unconstitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

[EDIT TO ADD: Also, there is nothing in federal statutes about wearing face masks. The CDC just made that up -- they never had any lawful authority to require that. And even the quarantines are ONLY for animals and plants when crossing into the USA from another country. There is NO statute that grants the federal government the autority to quarantine PEOPLE as some sort of precaution. It was ALL UNLAWFUL.]

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyranny -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

The mission of the CIA will be complete when everything the American people believes is false.

-- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan

I used to be baffled about why he would say that.

Now ... I understand.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the unconstitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

[EDIT TO ADD: Also, there is nothing in federal statutes about wearing face masks. The CDC just made that up -- they never had any lawful authority to require that. And even the quarantines are ONLY for animals and plants when crossing into the USA from another country. There is NO statute that grants the federal government the autority to quarantine PEOPLE as some sort of precaution. It was ALL UNLAWFUL.]

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyrrany -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

The mission of the CIA will be complete when everything the American people believes is false.

-- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan

I used to be baffled about why he would say that. Now ... I understand.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the unconstitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyrrany -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

The mission of the CIA will be complete when everything the American people believes is false.

-- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan

I used to be baffled about why he would say that. Now ... I understand.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the uncontitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyrrany -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

The mission of the CIA will be complete when everything the American people believes is false.

-- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan

I used to be baffled about why he would say that. Now ... I understand.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the uncontitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyrrany -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

The mission of the CIA will be complete when everything the American people believes is false. -- CIA Director William Casey, reporting to President Ronald Reagan

I used to be baffled about why he would say that. Now ... I understand.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the uncontitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyrrany -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who then pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the uncontitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, they stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelict in their duties to stop the tyrrany -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who they pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the uncontitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and then later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

This is also what happened with the Covid tyranny. The CDC issued "guidelines," and in their paper that issued the guidelines, the stated (as they are required to by law) what their lawful authority was to issue these guidelines.

The federal statutes they cited, if you looked them up, ONLY applied to federal territory and federal subject matter jurisdiction. IOW, the face mask guideline ONLY applied to aircraft and ships coming into the USA from foreign countries, and the crossing of state lines (so-called "interstate commerce" -- although that can ONLY apply to a true business transaction taking place, not individuals crossing state lines for personal travel purposes).

But the CDC did not spell this out. You had to understand what you were reading when you read the guideline and looked up the corresponding statute that they claimed to use as their lawful authority.

Then, they used the fact that 99% of people don't understand the distinctions -- including most attorneys, ALL of whom were derelick in their duties to stop the tyrrany -- to push what is NOT lawful onto State health agencies, who they pushed what was NOT lawful onto businesses and hospitals/clinics.

It is similar to HIPAA. Everyone in a hospital or clinic is trained that "you can't do that!" in a hospital/clinic because "it violates HIPAA!"

In reality, HIPAA is ONLY to protect that transmission of data, which includes patient records, when a hospital/clinic sends data for billing purposes to insurance companies or government insurers for the purpose of getting paid. It applies to NOTHING ELSE.

This can be seen if one were to simply read the statute. But nobody does that -- including most attorneys and ALL health industry workers.

More and more, attorneys do not read the LAW, but rather they tend to read summaries of what the law supposedly says, written by some random Harvard law professor.

Such is the horrific state of "the system" today.

Doctors don't know about heath.

Researchers don't know about science.

Attorneys don't know about law.

Police don't know about law enforcement.

Teachers don't know about history.

Clergy don't know what the Bible says.

It is a disgusting system where everyone pretends to be an expert, and just bullshits each other, rather than doing a little critical thinking to figure out the truth.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

As far as DC itself, they cannot grant it statehood because all States must be on equal footing, which DC can never be due to its federal territory status. It would be a violation of the constitutional clause that grants it the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government.

BTW, this is how ALL of the uncontitutional crap has been implemented over several decades.

The feds pass a law that can ONLY be enforced in federal territories and/or by way of federal subject matter, and they later they have federal departments begin to implement it within the States as a condition of money that the feds give to the States ("strings attached") -- and the federal courts (of course!) go along with it, allowing the feds to have authority within the States that they do not really have.

This applies to education, speed limits, the recent housing projects that are housing the invaders from other countries, and a zillion other laws where the States just become puppets of the feds, because the State politicians want the "free gibs" from the feds so they can buy more votes from the uninformed sheeple.

No.

In 1956, Congress did a complete report on what is federal jurisdiction (before all the current politically correct nonsense and usurpation of power by the establishment traitors).

Basically, the ONLY way the federal government can get jurisdiction over territory within a State is if either:

• The State's legislature grants total federal jurisdiction to the feds, or
• The feds retain federal jurisdiction over an area as a condition of granting statehood to a new State.

This is how the military bases are under federal jurisdiciton, and not State.

In North Carolina, for example, the State had to grant jurisdiction to the feds for military bases, because it was one of the original 13 States, and the feds had no authority to just take land and call it their own. The State legislature had to grant it to them.

In other States that were granted statehood by Congress, the feds retained some land area under federal jurisdiction (for forts and other similar purposes) as a condition of statehood.

https://www.defendruralamerica.com/files/DSJurisdictionReport1957.pdf

Under no circumstances can the feds just come in and take land and claim they have jurisdiction of that land.

.