Epstein is/was an intel asset whose purpose was to collect blackmail material on influential people, including (and especially) high-level officials. Such an operation would have direct ramifications on national policy and media, leveraging control away from the electorate and granting it to certain intel bureaucrats (and others) instead. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

The crux of that operation was human trafficking, a topic frequently discussed in Q posts. Epstein is directly mentioned in Q posts dozens of times. So anything related to human trafficking or crimes against children is certainly relevant and should be tracked.

I fail to see how a random NFL coach resigning fits into anything. If he resigned because of human trafficking connections I could see it, but that isn't the case. It doesn't impact anything or anyone outside of the ESPN acolytes who care about sports drama.

If we start tracking NFL coaches when they resign, who else should we track? Where do we draw the line?

Epstein is/was an intel asset whose purpose was to collect blackmail material on influential people, including (and especially) high-level officials. Such an operation would have a direct ramifications on national policy and media, leveraging control away from the electorate and granting it to certain intel bureaucrats (and others) instead. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

The crux of that operation was human trafficking, a topic frequently discussed in Q posts. Epstein is directly mentioned in Q posts dozens of times. So anything related to human trafficking or crimes against children is certainly relevant and should be tracked.

I fail to see how a random NFL coach resigning fits into anything. If he resigned because of human trafficking connections I could see it, but that isn't the case. It doesn't impact anything or anyone outside of the ESPN acolytes who care about sports drama.

If we start tracking NFL coaches when they resign, who else should we track? Where do we draw the line?