To be fair; If the roles were reversed; if a state like california was letting illegals flood in and the supreme court ruled the state could not because immigration is a federal matter; we'd all be cheering.

It's my understanding (based on a radio snip I heard, so correct me if I'm wrong) that the supremes essentially ruled that immigration is a federal matter, right?

Again; this could POTENTIALLY be a win, because when Trump gets in, in November....he will close that border tighter than crap & subsequent legal challenges SHOULD fail, based on this precedent.....

But I could be totally wrong.... I haven't read up on it much; just heard a blurb on the radio....

To be fair; If the roles were reversed; if a state like california was letting illegals flood in and the supreme court ruledthey could not because immigration is a federal matter; we'd all be cheering.

It's my understanding (based on a radio snip I heard, so correct me if I'm wrong) that the supremes essentially ruled that immigration is a federal matter, right?

But I could be totally wrong....