Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

They sacrifice millions of people in wars, "terrorism", and "disasters"; hits that target one passenger on fully-loaded airplanes; and individual hits on opponents (even fellow "elites" - JFK?, JFK, Jr.?), those who "know too much" and others simply as a threat (Kemp's daughter's boyfriend?).

FJB is old, demented and difficult to manage. He and his family have lots of "baggage" and "dirty laundry" that's being made public and projects negatively on the party; are becoming embroiled in investigations, indictments, and lawsuits; and are increasingly(/rapidly) becoming less useful and more of a liability/pariah/roadblock to "their" goals than an asset/path to victory.

Communists always get rid of their useful idiots after they've served their purpose/expended their usefulness and usually do so before they can either "turn on" them or become a "problem" of another sort to them.

Given "all that" PLUS their ownership of the media (to spin the story however they're instructed), would a "JFK event" to get FJB off the ballot and replace him with another candidate - with or without canonization - seem to be out of the realm of possibility?

238 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

They sacrifice millions of people in wars, "terrorism", and "disasters"; hits that target one passenger on fully-loaded airplanes; and individual hits on opponents (even fellow "elites" - JFK?, JFK, Jr.?), those who "know too much" and others simply as a threat (Raffensberger's daughter's boyfriend?).

FJB is old, demented and difficult to manage. He and his family have lots of "baggage" and "dirty laundry" that's being made public and projects negatively on the party; are becoming embroiled in investigations, indictments, and lawsuits; and are increasingly(/rapidly) becoming less useful and more of a liability/pariah/roadblock to "their" goals than an asset/path to victory.

Communists always get rid of their useful idiots after they've served their purpose/expended their usefulness and usually do so before they can either "turn on" them or become a "problem" of another sort to them.

Given "all that" PLUS their ownership of the media (to spin the story however they're instructed), would a "JFK event" to get FJB off the ballot and replace him with another candidate - with or without canonization - seem to be out of the realm of possibility?

238 days ago
1 score