Lmfao, all they can ever land on Trump is the weakest aspects of their arguments. Sadly, that's all they need to run headlines and let their useful idiots say "see, he was found guilty in the E Jean Carroll case!" without ever actually looking into the case to see what he was actually found guilty of (which, he will appeal and win anyway). Oh well, just another easy example we can show people trying to wake up how the media manipulates things.

Also, I want it noted the same judge overseeing this case was appointed by Bill Clinton and oversaw the Prince Andrews Jeffrey Epstein case. Surely no conflicts of interests in either of these cases, right?

Lmfao, all they can ever land on Trump is the weakest aspects of their arguments. Sadly, that's all they need to run headlines and let their useful idiots say "see, he was found guilty in the E Jean Carroll case!" without ever actually looking into the case to see what he was actually found guilty of (which, he will appeal and win anyway). Oh well, just another easy example we can show people trying to wake up how the media manipulates things.

Also, I want it noted the same judge overseeing this case was appointed by Bill Clinton and oversees the Prince Andrews Jeffrey Epstein case. Surely no conflicts of interests in either of these cases, right?