Well-stated and very important considerations to bear in mind always.

Just as when one writes (or speaks) they need to consider their audience, they’re doing so in order to convey information and/or theories-concepts in the most effective way possible. The beasts also consider their audience and do the same, but effectiveness to them is deceit and manipulation and usually for nefarious purposes. So it’s imperative to research the authors/speakers background in an attempt to determine if they have an ulterior motive.

Beyond that, finding out what conflicts of interest may affect what’s being relayed to the public will have another impact on the validity of the information being presented. “Experts say”, as you cite, is one example of this. “A sizable majority of people polled say” is another example when considering that beasts carefully choose the particular people to poll to get their desired outcome, use it as adding weight to their claims with “official sounding” ‘data’ (sic) to back it up.

Your perception regarding behavior is also important, perhaps more difficult for many to grasp. I feel that a lot of (though not all) anons are more naturally attuned to noticing these types of changes and trying to understand what they arise from. I think even during the infancy of the plandemic, for example, many people had heightened awareness that something was very amiss, that there was some sort of nefarious ulterior motive in play. Intuition. Ignore it at your peril.

Well-stated and very important considerations to bear in mind always.

Just as when one writes (or speaks) they need to consider their audience, they’re doing so in order to convey information and/or theories-concepts in the most effective way possible. The beasts also consider their audience and do the same, but effectiveness to them is deceit and manipulation and usually for nefarious purposes. So it’s imperative to research the authors/speakers background in an attempt to determine if they have an ulterior motive.

Beyond that, finding out what conflicts of interest may affect what’s being relayed to the public will have another impact on the validity of the information being presented. “Experts say”, as you cite, is one example of this. “A sizable majority of people polled say” is another example when considering that beasts carefully choose the particular people to poll to get their desired outcome, use it as adding weight to their claims with “official sounding” ‘data’ (sic) to back it up.