Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same thing in the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before the Scythian Genghis Khan came calling AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid the new Scythian Emperor Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. Once he became Emperor (Khan of Khans) he renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria, or Aryans) into the Tartarians (which I think means "Hell" or "the underworld," though I'm not sure about that one). By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, the Cabal and the present day Ruling Aristocracy has hidden their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all history (at least the antediluvian history), covering most of Asia and Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same thing in the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before the Scythian Genghis Khan came calling AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. Once he became Emperor (Khan of Khans) he renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria, or Aryans) into the Tartarians (which I think means "Hell" or "the underworld," though I'm not sure about that one). By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, the Cabal and the present day Ruling Aristocracy has hidden their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all history (at least the antediluvian history), covering most of Asia and Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same thing in the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before the Scythian Genghis Khan came calling AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. Once he became Emperor (Khan of Khans) he renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria, or Aryans) into the Tartarians (which I think means "Hell" or "the underworld," though I'm not sure about that one). By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all history (at least the antediluvian history), covering most of Asia and Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same thing in the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before the Scythian Genghis Khan came calling AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria, or Aryans) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all history (at least the antediluvian history), covering most of Asia and Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same thing in the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria, or Aryans) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all history (at least the antediluvian history), covering most of Asia and Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same thing in the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all history (at least the antediluvian history), covering most of Asia and Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all history (at least the antediluvian history), covering most of Asia and Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia. They hid that this Empire was the largest and longest lasting empire of all time, covering most of Asia ane Europe, and lasting for between 2500 and 5000 years. They hid their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary, and the true origins of the Aryan Race (AKA the Royal Scythians, the ruling Aristocracy of the Scythian/Tartarian Empire) from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khanate until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khante until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Genghis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, religion, philosophy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khante until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Ghengis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as our culture, relgion, philosphy, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khante until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Ghengis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are missing so much context from your "fact checking". Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as culture, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khante until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Ghengis Khan) to prove exactly that. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are getting all of your facts incorrect. Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as culture, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never the dominant Khante until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Ghengis Khan) to do so. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are getting all of your facts incorrect. Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as culture, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whatever Khan of the Scythian Empire they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never dominant until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Ghengis Khan) to do so. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are getting all of your facts incorrect. Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as culture, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire, both before Genghis Khan AND before they became the larger state of Kievan Rus. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whoever they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never dominant until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Ghengis Khan) to do so. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are getting all of your facts incorrect. Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as culture, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Russia as we know it was formed under Tsar Peter I.

This is only partially true. It was both formed under Tsar Peter I as a formal state of Kieven Rus (it actually existed as the same people doing the same way in the same region for a long time before that), but it was ALSO a principality of the Scythian Empire. Proving that takes a fair bit of time, but you can start here. (Please appreciate the response in that link is short (relative to the topic), and a response to something else, so the context may be a bit wonky, but there is plenty there to get you started).

The Mongols didn't conquer all of them

Well, I agree, but I disagree with the implication. They were a Principality already of the Scythian Empire. They paid Genghis Khan tribute instead of whoever they were paying tribute to before. No conquering needed. What do you think a Principality is?

When the Mongols showed up, Russia or Kievan Rus as it is now known was a confederation of independent pricendoms with different forms of government.

Not exactly. It's form of government was the same as the rest of the Empire of Scythia, which is "you keep what you kill" (as I call it). It was similar to the Game of Thrones style of government mixed with the Dothraki mixed with Necromunda. The weak paid Tribute to the strong. They gave slaves, they gave conscripts, they gave whatever was demanded of them. They were a subject State to whoever held dominance over them. As far as I can find, the Principality of Russia (Kievan Rus) was never dominant until it was, starting around 1500 and ending in the early 20th century when they finally wiped out all traces of the scope of the Scythian Empire from history.

Again, proving that takes a lot of work, since it has been hidden from history. I've written up a few hundred pages on the Empire of Scythia (called "Tartary" by Ghengis Khan) to do so. I will publish it at some point.

but as far as I know [the Scythians] disappeared around the 9th century.

Which is exactly why you are getting all of your facts incorrect. Genghis Khan was a Scythian. He renamed the Scythians (they actually called themselves the Aria (or Aryans)) into the Tartarians. By wiping out the Empire of Tartary from history, they hid their connection to the Empire of Scythia, and their form of government, their multi-ethnicity, their origins of pretty much everything we think of as culture, etc.

My research suggests all of history has been rewritten. Understanding the Empire of Scythia/Tartary plays a huge part in understanding the level of fuckery there.

Same thing wit the Khazars. They were quickly assimilated by the Slavic princendoms.

I'm not sure what "quickly" means to you. They lasted as a formal state (Khanate) for a few hundred years. Longer than the US.

I'm not sure what the rest of (5) is for, you didn't say anything against what I said, and I mostly agree.

128 days ago
1 score