You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

"Allowed boxes" are pretty much any box you can think of that has a large and persistent group associated with it. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on only a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic model, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads, through iteration, to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a predetermined "compromise position," or in a place where each thesis and antithesis start in agreement; where they never argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

"Allowed boxes" are pretty much any box you can think of that has a large and persistent group associated with it. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on only a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic model, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads, through iteration, to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a predetermined "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they never argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

"Allowed boxes" are pretty much any box you can think of that has a large and persistent group associated with it. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on only a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic model, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads, through iteration, to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they never argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

"Allowed boxes" are pretty much any box you can think of that has a large and persistent group associated with it. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on only a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic model, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they never argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

"Allowed boxes" are pretty much any box you can think of that has a large and persistent group associated with it. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on only a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they never argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

"Allowed boxes" are pretty much any box you can think of that has a large and persistent group associated with it. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they never argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they never argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In the case of the quote above, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

I have a few points of contention with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a a couple. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." I don't mean there is no such thing in theory, but in practice, all "natural processes" are actually "controlled processes." The belief in the natural process of science or academic investigation is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist
• Hippies

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or "escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box in the "I've heard of that group" category that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," or any other "non-conformist" group like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can define where other people will understand which "group" you are talking about.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• Academia
• Science
• Historians
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right
• Protestants
• Catholics
• Muslims
• Americans
• Chinese
• etc.

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about the 17th century). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say; there are too many statements about it that vary.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," "anti-Semitic," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control because all information is controlled. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful or can't be subverted, they are stamped out into oblivion. Nothing escapes this control. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful, they stamped out into oblivion. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful, they stamped out into oblivion. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

I think the most important thing to understand is that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful, they stamped out into oblivion. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and aided in the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful, they stamped out into oblivion. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. If they aren't useful, they stamped out into oblivion. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to definition of the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of freedom of thought. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they arise organically and are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of free will. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed them, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of free will. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposing groups, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of free will. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposition, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of free will. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time, indeed, they created it.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposition, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of free will. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.

You draw an analogy to corporate governance, where a board of directors holds ultimate authority, and suggest that only this small group needs to be compromised for control over the entire organization or, by extension, the world economy.

This is not quite what I am saying. I am saying that there exists a SINGLE Board of Directors shared across the entirety of the planet, and there has been for over 140 years. That BoD controls all of everything. They control all news sources, they control all schools, all curriculums, all publishing on every level, all governments across the planet, indeed, all beliefs. They create those beliefs by creating boxes. Many, many boxes. We have the "freedom" to choose from any of those boxes. We can even choose multiples, making us "free thinkers" or "non-partisans," but evidence suggests even the "mixed" boxes have specific controls. Once we've chosen our box(es) we are fed information to support the beliefs espoused by the larger group. Again, we can pick and choose our beliefs, but we rarely look outside of the beliefs of some box, and when we do, there are programs running that guide us back to one or the other of the allowed boxes.

Allowed boxes are pretty much any box you can think of. It includes boxes like:

• The Left
• The Right

but it also includes the boxes that are "free thinkers," or 'escaped from The Matrix," etc. like:

• Conspiracy Theorist
• Anarchist

and any other 'group" that you can think of.

There is no box that is not controlled.

Now, some of this control has slipped recently (part of the currently running psyop is to create distrust in The System), but the boxes still exist, and the programs are still trying to push people back into it

Now, obviously that's too narrow of an explanation, and more than just a little bit crazy without ludicrous amounts of evidence. "Not everything is compromised and controlled." That is what my report is for. You can't tell people how the world works, you have to show them.

Additionally, there are countless instances throughout history where grassroots movements, social revolutions, and shifts in public opinion have challenged and changed dominant narratives, demonstrating that power is not always concentrated at the top.

There are numerous problems with your "counterpoints," but I will focus on a few. Again, my report is designed to be the evidence. In this venue, I can only "tell you," I can't show you. If you want to be shown, you must read my report.

In this case, every single grassroots movement has been controlled opposition.

Every

Single

One.

(At least every single one going back the past 300 years or so that I have looked at, which is well over a hundred).

They either start as controlled opposition (part of the dialectic), or, if they are useful, they are allowed to grow, pushed by the Cabal controlled media (which is ALL media), after they come under control of the Cabal. The evidence is overwhelming, and the next part of my report will show this in detail for one such "grassroots" organizations, the IWW (Wobblies). This organization began as the "opposition" for corporate America, and led to Union organizations and the creation of Practical Communism (USSR, China, etc.). It was controlled completely by the Cabal the entire time.

The first part of my report shows a similar thing on a smaller scale during the creation of Megacorp. Future sections will show how it has been applied across the board by showing the institutions that are designed to create such oppositions, and, in their own words, how they control the narrative.

Something to understand about the dialectic is, my research suggests it is running in reverse. In other words, there is an end goal that was created a few hundred years ago (I'm not sure when exactly, but I can trace it back with confidence to about that time). When you have an end goal, and you apply the dialectic, you can determine which point and counterpoint you want to create to achieve the synthesis that leads to the end goal. Like a maze, it is far easier to start at the end and work backwards then to go forwards from the beginning. Thus every entity in opposition is created in opposition, with the desired synthesis contained not within the disagreements of the opposition, but within either a "compromise position," or in a place where they start in agreement; where they don't argue at all. Once constructed, this system is allowed to move forward to the specifically intended synthesis that will lead to Utopia (according to the creators of the dialectic map). This "Utopia" is the starting point of their map, and the end point of ours, thus "running in reverse."

I do not know what "Utopia" really means. I think it has to do with the "Chosen Race" and the "Promised Land," but it's tough to say.

it's essential to distinguish between deliberate manipulation and the natural processes of transmission and translation.

There is no "natural process." That is one of the beliefs put into all "credible" boxes specifically to keep people from seeing the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

The most important thing to understand is, I think, that it isn't the "Victors" that write the history books, it is the publishers. There is a group of people that control every single thing that gets published. Now, don't get me wrong. I think there are quite a few things that get put out there that aren't under their direct control, but there are numerous mechanism of indirect control ("system of experts," "consensus," "conspiracy theory," "pseudoscience," "controversial," etc.) that ensure the overall narrative stays under their control, and all of the little boxes get different pieces of the truth. Every single one of those parenthetical quotes, these "mechanisms of indirect control" are systems constructed by the Cabal, and I will show exactly who constructed, how they were constructed, and what they have to say about it in present and future sections of my report.

Our world isn't designed to be a "single voice," that doesn't sell. Indeed, 1984 was a book specifically put out to push that false narrative. To suggest that "this is what a hidden world domination looks like." That was a purposeful fraud. The Matrix looks like a million boxes, all controlled, to create the illusion of free will. That is the only way to sell it.

All of your other "counterpoints" make appeals to authority and consensus. I will ignore any such fallacious appeal from here forward. I assert that both authority and consensus are manufactured in every case (or if derived organically they are allowed to thrive because they fit the narrative). That is how the world is controlled, by the Gatekeepers of information.

In order to understand that, you have to understand how these information gates are constructed, and who the Gatekeepers are. That can only be shown. I invite you to read my report. It's a big ask, because it is not laid out in a way that is skippable, too much context is scattered throughout. But I suggest if you read it, it will open your eyes. Especially the next part (hopefully done very soon), which discusses how all of Science, medicine, and education were created, are controlled, and why.