exciting affirmation

Q2604

Those who push simply have no grasp of reality. Those who push simply do not understand warfare tactics. Emotions cloud judgement. Emotions cloud logic. You have more than you know.

I do, but there are a whole bunches of new ones now. It's an exciting affirmation for them. Or maybe it's nothing.... I like it though.

Hmmm.... Look, I think its fine to raise the possibility and to examine it. But it should be examined, analysed and sifted, not simply celebrated because "oooh! It looks like a comm!"

The question is, where does the train of thought lead, using the proposition as a starting point?

Does it lead to pseudo-religious beliefs that are adopted and harbored because they are emotionally satisfying (aka 'opiate hopium') or does it lead to increased understanding, greater apprehension of truth, and an even more robust mental approach in which critical thinking plays an important part (aka what I would call 'hopermectin')?

I'm not saying you can't like it. I'm saying that choosing to believe in certain things comes with consequences, and all anons should be mindful of where their thinking is leading them. To me, that seems axiomatic to everything that Q posted.

There is (likely) no way he uses "phase" rather than "part" if not for a wink to anons.

With apologies, this seems highly subjective as a speculation.

If you can make the argument and back it with evidence and reasoning (for example, use of phase vs part in a body of linguistic corpus (aka a large volume of text or speech that shows how and where phase is used, in what contexts, vs part, in what contexts, etc), (how much DJT uses it, etc, etc.), then I could take the assertion seriously, but on itself, I think it's just a speculative idea adopted as a belief.

Just saying! Devil's avocado, and all that...

exciting affirmation

Q2604

Those who push simply have no grasp of reality. Those who push simply do not understand warfare tactics. Emotions cloud judgement. Emotions cloud logic. You have more than you know.

If excitement is based on unreasonable belief, aka illusion, that is upheld for its own sake because it is exciting (emotionally comforting or satisfying), how is this any different from what the Cabal has been doing via Hollywood and the entertainment industry?

There's nothing wrong with 'excitement', but if it becomes a matter of promoting unreasonable thinking, mentally undisciplined speculations, etc, justified because of the emotional power it packs, then its simply another form of matrix.

I'm not saying you can't like it. I'm saying that choosing to believe in certain things comes with consequences.

There is (likely) no way he uses "phase" rather than "part" if not for a wink to anons.

With apologies, this seems highly subjective as a speculation. So subjective that I think, frankly, its ridiculous. (Just being frank; no offense intended.)

Please make the argument and back it with evidence and reasoning, re: use of phase vs part in a body of linguistic corpus (aka a large volume of text or speech that shows how and where phase is used, in what contexts, vs part, in what contexts, etc).

As a linguist (aka language specialist), I find the statement to be highly subjective!